Literature DB >> 27646405

Elastic and viscoelastic mechanical properties of brain tissues on the implanting trajectory of sub-thalamic nucleus stimulation.

Yan Li1, Jianxin Deng2, Jun Zhou3, Xueen Li4.   

Abstract

Corresponding to pre-puncture and post-puncture insertion, elastic and viscoelastic mechanical properties of brain tissues on the implanting trajectory of sub-thalamic nucleus stimulation are investigated, respectively. Elastic mechanical properties in pre-puncture are investigated through pre-puncture needle insertion experiments using whole porcine brains. A linear polynomial and a second order polynomial are fitted to the average insertion force in pre-puncture. The Young's modulus in pre-puncture is calculated from the slope of the two fittings. Viscoelastic mechanical properties of brain tissues in post-puncture insertion are investigated through indentation stress relaxation tests for six interested regions along a planned trajectory. A linear viscoelastic model with a Prony series approximation is fitted to the average load trace of each region using Boltzmann hereditary integral. Shear relaxation moduli of each region are calculated using the parameters of the Prony series approximation. The results show that, in pre-puncture insertion, needle force almost increases linearly with needle displacement. Both fitting lines can perfectly fit the average insertion force. The Young's moduli calculated from the slope of the two fittings are worthy of trust to model linearly or nonlinearly instantaneous elastic responses of brain tissues, respectively. In post-puncture insertion, both region and time significantly affect the viscoelastic behaviors. Six tested regions can be classified into three categories in stiffness. Shear relaxation moduli decay dramatically in short time scales but equilibrium is never truly achieved. The regional and temporal viscoelastic mechanical properties in post-puncture insertion are valuable for guiding probe insertion into each region on the implanting trajectory.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27646405     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-016-5775-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  43 in total

1.  A response surface model predicting the in vivo insertion behavior of micromachined neural implants.

Authors:  A Andrei; M Welkenhuysen; B Nuttin; W Eberle
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: surgical technique and perioperative management.

Authors:  Andre Machado; Ali R Rezai; Brian H Kopell; Robert E Gross; Ashwini D Sharan; Alim-Louis Benabid
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 3.  Needle insertion into soft tissue: a survey.

Authors:  Niki Abolhassani; Rajni Patel; Mehrdad Moallem
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Viscoelastic properties of the rat brain in the sagittal plane: effects of anatomical structure and age.

Authors:  John D Finan; Benjamin S Elkin; Erica M Pearson; Irene L Kalbian; Barclay Morrison
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Dynamic, regional mechanical properties of the porcine brain: indentation in the coronal plane.

Authors:  Benjamin S Elkin; Ashok Ilankova; Barclay Morrison
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Dynamic mechanical response of brain tissue in indentation in vivo, in situ and in vitro.

Authors:  Thibault P Prevost; Guang Jin; Marc A de Moya; Hasan B Alam; Subra Suresh; Simona Socrate
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Biomechanical analysis of silicon microelectrode-induced strain in the brain.

Authors:  Hyunjung Lee; Ravi V Bellamkonda; Wei Sun; Marc E Levenston
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Age-dependent changes in material properties of the brain and braincase of the rat.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Nurit Gefen; Qiliang Zhu; Ramesh Raghupathi; Susan S Margulies
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Accuracy of stereotactic electrode placement in deep brain stimulation by intraoperative computed tomography.

Authors:  Thomas Fiegele; Gudrun Feuchtner; Florian Sohm; Richard Bauer; Jürgen Volker Anton; Thaddäus Gotwald; Klaus Twerdy; Wilhelm Eisner
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.891

10.  Direction and predictive factors for the shift of brain structure during deep brain stimulation electrode implantation for advanced Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Toshiki Obuchi; Yoichi Katayama; Kazutaka Kobayashi; Hideki Oshima; Chikashi Fukaya; Takamitsu Yamamoto
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2008-10
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Tissue mechanics regulate brain development, homeostasis and disease.

Authors:  J Matthew Barnes; Laralynne Przybyla; Valerie M Weaver
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Accounting for Deformation in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery With Models: Comparison to Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Ma Luo; Paul S Larson; Alastair J Martin; Michael I Miga
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.756

3.  Softening of the chronic hemi-section spinal cord injury scar parallels dysregulation of cellular and extracellular matrix content.

Authors:  Hannah J Baumann; Gautam Mahajan; Trevor R Ham; Patricia Betonio; Chandrasekhar R Kothapalli; Leah P Shriver; Nic D Leipzig
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-06-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.