OBJECTIVES: The pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is complex. Vitamin D (VitD) has been implicated in NAFLD pathogenesis because it has roles in immune modulation, cell differentiation and proliferation, and regulation of inflammation. We evaluated the association of VitD levels, hepatic gene expression for VitD metabolizing genes, and NAFLD histological severity. METHODS: Two adult cohorts, controls (n=39) and NAFLD (n=244), who underwent liver biopsy were compared. Two-sided t-tests or Wilcoxon's rank-sum tests for continuous predictors and chi-squared tests or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables were used to analyze the association of VitD and NAFLD. Generalized linear models were used to analyze the association of VitD levels and VitD metabolizing genes with histological severity of NAFLD while adjusting for potential confounders and correcting for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: NAFLD patients were more likely than controls to have higher HbA1c (6.5±1.2 vs 5.9±1.0; P=0.009), a risk factor for VitD deficiency. However, no difference in VitD levels was observed between groups. VitD levels did not correlate with the severity of hepatic steatosis, lobular or portal inflammation, or ballooned hepatocytes after adjusting for confounding factors. Furthermore, no association was noted between VitD deficiency or differential expression of genes involved in VitD metabolism and severity of hepatic fibrosis or any other histologic feature of NAFLD. CONCLUSIONS: Neither VitD deficiency, nor hepatic expression of VitD-related genes, associate with the presence or histologic severity of NAFLD in patients. Hence, despite preclinical evidence implicating VitD in NAFLD pathogenesis, VitD deficiency does not appear to be associated with NAFLD severity in humans.
OBJECTIVES: The pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is complex. Vitamin D (VitD) has been implicated in NAFLD pathogenesis because it has roles in immune modulation, cell differentiation and proliferation, and regulation of inflammation. We evaluated the association of VitD levels, hepatic gene expression for VitD metabolizing genes, and NAFLD histological severity. METHODS: Two adult cohorts, controls (n=39) and NAFLD (n=244), who underwent liver biopsy were compared. Two-sided t-tests or Wilcoxon's rank-sum tests for continuous predictors and chi-squared tests or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables were used to analyze the association of VitD and NAFLD. Generalized linear models were used to analyze the association of VitD levels and VitD metabolizing genes with histological severity of NAFLD while adjusting for potential confounders and correcting for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: NAFLD patients were more likely than controls to have higher HbA1c (6.5±1.2 vs 5.9±1.0; P=0.009), a risk factor for VitD deficiency. However, no difference in VitD levels was observed between groups. VitD levels did not correlate with the severity of hepatic steatosis, lobular or portal inflammation, or ballooned hepatocytes after adjusting for confounding factors. Furthermore, no association was noted between VitD deficiency or differential expression of genes involved in VitD metabolism and severity of hepatic fibrosis or any other histologic feature of NAFLD. CONCLUSIONS: Neither VitD deficiency, nor hepatic expression of VitD-related genes, associate with the presence or histologic severity of NAFLD in patients. Hence, despite preclinical evidence implicating VitD in NAFLD pathogenesis, VitD deficiency does not appear to be associated with NAFLD severity in humans.
Authors: Dean Yimlamai; Constantina Christodoulou; Giorgio G Galli; Kilangsungla Yanger; Brian Pepe-Mooney; Basanta Gurung; Kriti Shrestha; Patrick Cahan; Ben Z Stanger; Fernando D Camargo Journal: Cell Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Anja Beilfuss; Jan-Peter Sowa; Svenja Sydor; Mechthild Beste; Lars P Bechmann; Martin Schlattjan; Wing-Kin Syn; Inga Wedemeyer; Zoltan Mathé; Christoph Jochum; Guido Gerken; Robert K Gieseler; Ali Canbay Journal: Gut Date: 2014-08-18 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: James E Nelson; Christian L Roth; Laura A Wilson; Katherine P Yates; Bradley Aouizerat; Vicki Morgan-Stevenson; Elizabeth Whalen; Andrew Hoofnagle; Michael Mason; Vivian Gersuk; Matthew M Yeh; Kris V Kowdley Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Ning Ding; Ruth T Yu; Nanthakumar Subramaniam; Mara H Sherman; Caroline Wilson; Renuka Rao; Mathias Leblanc; Sally Coulter; Mingxiao He; Christopher Scott; Sue L Lau; Annette R Atkins; Grant D Barish; Jenny E Gunton; Christopher Liddle; Michael Downes; Ronald M Evans Journal: Cell Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: E Cipponeri; N Vitturi; V Mariano; F Boscari; S Galasso; C Crepaldi; G P Fadini; S Vigili de Kreutzenberg; M C Marescotti; E Iori; F Cavallin; L Sartori; A Baritussio; A Avogaro; D Bruttomesso Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Bryan Rudolph; Tyler Selig; Yingjie Li; Nadia Ovchinsky; Debora Kogan-Liberman; Mark C Liszewski; Terry Levin; Michelle Ewart; Qiang Liu; Shankar Viswanathan; Juan Lin; Xiaonan Xue; Robert D Burk; Howard D Strickler Journal: JPGN Rep Date: 2021-05
Authors: P S Gibson; A Quaglia; A Dhawan; H Wu; S Lanham-New; K H Hart; E Fitzpatrick; J B Moore Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 4.000