Yewei Chen1, Jinmiao Lu1, Min Dong2, Dan Wu1, Yiqing Zhu1, Qin Li1, Chao Chen3, Zhiping Li4. 1. Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, 399 Wanyuan Road, Shanghai, 201102, China. 2. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 3. Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 4. Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, 399 Wanyuan Road, Shanghai, 201102, China. zplifudan@126.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) analyses for piperacillin/tazobactam in neonates and infants of less than 2 months of age have been performed by our group previously. The results indicate that a dose of 44.44/5.56 mg/kg piperacillin/tazobactam every 8 or 12 h may not be enough for controlling infection in this population. In order to determine the appropriate dosing regimen and to provide a rationale for the development of dosing guidelines suitable for this population, further popPK studies of piperacillin/tazobactam would need to be conducted. The aim of the present study was to determine the appropriate dosing regimen and optimal sampling schedules in neonates and infants of less than 2 months of age. METHODS: Pharmacodynamic profiling of piperacillin using Monte Carlo simulation was performed to explore the target attainment probability of different dosing regimens for infections caused by different isolated pathogens. D-optimal designs for piperacillin and tazobactam were conducted separately, and the times that overlapped were chosen as the final sampling scheme for future popPK studies in neonates and young infants of less than 2 months of age. RESULTS: Our findings revealed that compared to the current empirical piperacillin/tazobactam dose regimen (50 mg/kg every 12 h by 5-min infusion in our hospital), the clinical outcome could be improved by increasing doses, increasing administration frequency, and prolonging intravenous infusion in neonates and infants of less than 2 months of age. The following optimal sampling windows were chosen as the final sampling scheme: 0.1-0.11, 0.26-0.29, 0.97-2.62, and 7.95-11.9 h administered every 12 h with 5-min infusion; 0.1-0.12, 0.39-0.56, 2.86-4.95, and 8.91-11.8 h administered every 12 h with 3-h infusion; 0.1-0.11, 0.22-0.29, 0.91-1.96, and 5.56-7.93 h administered every 8 h with 5-min infusion; 0.1-0.11, 0.38-0.48, 2.54-3.82, and 6.86-7.93 h administered every 8 h with 3-h infusion; 0.1-0.11, 0.25-0.28, 0.84-1.69, and 4.55-5.94 h administered every 6 h with 5-min infusion; and 0.1-0.11, 0.37-0.54, 3.13-3.72, and 5.57-5.99 h administered every 6 h with 3-h infusion. CONCLUSIONS: The dosing regimen and sampling schedules proposed in this study should be evaluated in future popPK studies of piperacillin/tazobactam in neonates and infants. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that combined optimal sampling design with Monte Carlo simulation for designing popPK studies of piperacillin/tazobactam.
OBJECTIVES: Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) analyses for piperacillin/tazobactam in neonates and infants of less than 2 months of age have been performed by our group previously. The results indicate that a dose of 44.44/5.56 mg/kg piperacillin/tazobactam every 8 or 12 h may not be enough for controlling infection in this population. In order to determine the appropriate dosing regimen and to provide a rationale for the development of dosing guidelines suitable for this population, further popPK studies of piperacillin/tazobactam would need to be conducted. The aim of the present study was to determine the appropriate dosing regimen and optimal sampling schedules in neonates and infants of less than 2 months of age. METHODS: Pharmacodynamic profiling of piperacillin using Monte Carlo simulation was performed to explore the target attainment probability of different dosing regimens for infections caused by different isolated pathogens. D-optimal designs for piperacillin and tazobactam were conducted separately, and the times that overlapped were chosen as the final sampling scheme for future popPK studies in neonates and young infants of less than 2 months of age. RESULTS: Our findings revealed that compared to the current empirical piperacillin/tazobactam dose regimen (50 mg/kg every 12 h by 5-min infusion in our hospital), the clinical outcome could be improved by increasing doses, increasing administration frequency, and prolonging intravenous infusion in neonates and infants of less than 2 months of age. The following optimal sampling windows were chosen as the final sampling scheme: 0.1-0.11, 0.26-0.29, 0.97-2.62, and 7.95-11.9 h administered every 12 h with 5-min infusion; 0.1-0.12, 0.39-0.56, 2.86-4.95, and 8.91-11.8 h administered every 12 h with 3-h infusion; 0.1-0.11, 0.22-0.29, 0.91-1.96, and 5.56-7.93 h administered every 8 h with 5-min infusion; 0.1-0.11, 0.38-0.48, 2.54-3.82, and 6.86-7.93 h administered every 8 h with 3-h infusion; 0.1-0.11, 0.25-0.28, 0.84-1.69, and 4.55-5.94 h administered every 6 h with 5-min infusion; and 0.1-0.11, 0.37-0.54, 3.13-3.72, and 5.57-5.99 h administered every 6 h with 3-h infusion. CONCLUSIONS: The dosing regimen and sampling schedules proposed in this study should be evaluated in future popPK studies of piperacillin/tazobactam in neonates and infants. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that combined optimal sampling design with Monte Carlo simulation for designing popPK studies of piperacillin/tazobactam.
Entities:
Keywords:
Antibiotics; Monte Carlo simulation; Neonate; Optimal design; Piperacillin/tazobactam; Population pharmacodynamics
Authors: Jason A Roberts; Carl M J Kirkpatrick; Michael S Roberts; Andrew J Dalley; Jeffrey Lipman Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: Katherine M Shea; S Christian Cheatham; David W Smith; Matthew F Wack; Kevin M Sowinski; Michael B Kays Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Jessica K Roberts; Chris Stockmann; Alfred Balch; Tian Yu; Robert M Ward; Michael G Spigarelli; Catherine M T Sherwin Journal: Paediatr Anaesth Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 2.556
Authors: Sylvia M Verhoven; Joseph J Groszek; William H Fissell; Adam Seegmiller; Jennifer Colby; Pratish Patel; Alain Verstraete; Matthew Shotwell Journal: Clin Chim Acta Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 3.786