| Literature DB >> 27643785 |
Pallagae Mangala C S De Silva1, Khaja Shameem Mohammed Abdul1, Eakanayake M D V Eakanayake1, Sudheera Sammanthi Jayasinghe2, Channa Jayasumana3, Hewa Bandulage Asanthi4, Hettiarachigae S D Perera4, Gamage G Tushara Chaminda5, Ediriweera P S Chandana1, Sisira H Siribaddana6.
Abstract
Chronic Kidney Disease of uncertain etiology (CKDu) is an emerging epidemic among farming communities in rural Sri Lanka. Victims do not exhibit common causative factors, however, histopathological studies revealed that CKDu is a tubulointerstitial disease. Urine albumin or albumin-creatinine ratio is still being used as a traditional diagnostic tool to identify CKDu, but accuracy and prevalence data generated are questionable. Urinary biomarkers have been used in similar nephropathy and are widely recognised for their sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in determining CKDu and early renal injury. However, these biomarkers have never been used in diagnosing CKDu in Sri Lanka. Male farmers (n = 1734) were recruited from 4 regions in Sri Lanka i.e. Matara and Nuwara Eliya (farming locations with no CKDu prevalence) and two CKDu emerging locations from Hambantota District in Southern Sri Lanka; Angunakolapelessa (EL1) and Bandagiriya (EL2). Albuminuria (ACR ≥ 30mg/g); serum creatinine based estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); creatinine normalized urinary kidney injury molecule (KIM-1) and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) were measured. Fourteen new CKDu cases (18%) from EL1 and nine CKDu cases (9%) from EL2 were recognized for the first time from EL1, EL2 locations, which were previously considered as non-endemic of the disease and associated with persistent albuminuria (ACR ≥ 30mg/g Cr). No CKDu cases were identified in non-endemic study locations in Matara (CM) and Nuwara Eliya (CN). Analysis of urinary biomarkers showed urinary KIM-1 and NGAL were significantly higher in new CKDu cases in EL1 and EL2. However, we also reported significantly higher KIM-1 and NGAL in apparently healthy farmers in EL 1 and EL 2 with comparison to both control groups. These observations may indicate possible early renal damage in absence of persistent albuminuria and potential capabilities of urinary KIM-1 and NGAL in early detection of renal injury among farming communities in Southern Sri Lanka.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27643785 PMCID: PMC5028052 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004979
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Study locations of the current study (Agunukolapalassa; EL1, Badagiriya; EL2, Matara; CM) in Southern Province and Nuwara Eliya (CN) in Central Province represented with different climatic zones in Sri Lanka.
Fig 2Flow chart representing study populations and study design in non-endemic control locations in Matara (CM), Nuwara Eliya (CN) and two farming locations (Agunukolapalassa—EL1 & Badagiriya—EL2).
Baseline characteristics of the study populations representing non-endemic control groups (CM & CN), CKDu emerging locations Angunakolapelessa (EL1) and Bandagiriya (EL2).
All variables are presented as % and numbers indicates medical conditions.
| Non-endemic locations | CKDu emerging locations | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matara (CM) | Nuwara Eliya (CN) | Angunakolapelessa (EL1) | Bandagiriya (EL2) | |
| (N = 102) | (N = 104) | (N = 106) | (N = 127) | |
| 44.7 ± 1.8 | 48.9 ± 1.6 | 47.7 ± 0.9 | 56.8 ± 0.9 | |
| Primary | 15 | 13 | 34 | 44 |
| Secondary/Higher | 85 | 87 | 53 | 39 |
| Uneducated | - | - | 13 | 17 |
| 12 | 48 | 47 | 44 | |
| 12 | 58 | 55 | 49 | |
| 6 | 23 | 61 | 65 | |
| 15 | 0 | 77 | 75 | |
| Tap | 91 | 82.6 | 62.2 | 99.2 |
| Well | 9 | 17.4 | 37.8 | 0.8 |
| Tap | 91 | 82.6 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Well | 9 | 17.4 | 95.3 | 96.8 |
| - | 78 | 100 | 97 | |
| - | 54 | 33 | 51 | |
| Diabetes | - | 1 | 6 | 12 |
| Hypertension | - | 6 | 13 | 10 |
| Arthritis, Gastritis, renal calculi etc. | 4 | 4 | 10 | 10 |
Clinical characteristics of the study populations representing non-endemic locations in Matara (CM), Nuwara Eliya (CN) and CKDu emerging locations Angunakolapelessa (EL1) and Bandagiriya (EL2).
| Non-endemic locations | CKDu emerging locations | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matara (CM) | Nuwara Eliya (CN) | Angunakolapelessa (EL1) | Bandagiriya (EL2) | |
| (N = 98) | (N = 93) | (N = 77) | (N = 95) | |
| Mean ±S.E.M | 3.2±0.4 | 8.6±0.8 | 17.4±2.4 | 13±1.5 |
| 00 (0%) | 00 (0%) | 14 (18.18%) | 09 (9.47%) | |
| Mean ±S.E.M | 0.89±0.03 | 0.79±0.001 | 0.93±0.02 | 0.93±0.01 |
| CKD-EPI; Mean ±S.E.M | 110±2.6 | 107±1.3 | 98±1.7 | 92±1.5 |
| MDRD; Mean ±S.E.M | 103±3.2 | 107±1.5 | 91±1.8 | 90±1.9 |
| 98/98 (100%) | 93/93 (100%) | 74/77 (96%) | 93/95 (98%) | |
| 00 (0%) | 00 (0%) | 03 (4%) | 02 (2%) | |
Creatinine adjusted tubular markers (KIM-1 & NGAL) and clinical data in non-endemic controls (CM & CN) and two CKDu emerging locations (EL1 and EL2).
EL1 and EL2 further divided as control subjects from the same locations (C-EL1 & C-EL2) and CKDu subjects (EL1-CKDu & EL2- CKDu). All variables are present as mean (SEM) and range.
| Non-endemic locations | Emerging location 1 (EL1) | Emerging location 2 (EL2) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CM (N = 54) | CN (N = 52) | C-EL1 (N = 42) | EL1 –CKDu (N = 14) | C-EL2 (N = 52) | EL2 –CKDu (N = 09) | |
| 1.26 (0.15) | 0.17 (0.08) | 16.07 (3.19) | 64.27 (11.43) | 10.52 (1.72) | 48.53 (9.37) | |
| 0.3–6.46 | 0–3.4 | 0–73.39 | 22.55–176.11 | 0–42.90 | 6.41–87.48 | |
| 0.30 (0.03) | 0.47(0.05) | 0.76 (0.11) | 2.46 (0.60) | 1.16 (0.09) | 6.95 (2.44) | |
| 0.02–0.97 | 0–1.63 | 0–2.69 | 0.16–8.78 | 0.18–2.84 | 0.45–24.12 | |
| 3.21 (0.48) | 8.85(1.1) | 16.14 (1.7) | 52.89 (8.77) | 9.82 (1.57) | 54.26 (6.09) | |
| 1.16–13.00 | 2.95–27.3 | 2.6–29.4 | 31–124.4 | 0.6–28.2 | 35.2–82.2 | |
| 0.9(0.03) | 0.8(0.01) | 0.9(0.04) | 0.9(0.03) | 0.9(0.04) | 1.1(0.06) | |
| 108 (2.5) | 108 (1.88) | 95.81 (4.51) | 96.5 (3.76) | 94.93 (4.93) | 78.78 (5.85) | |
| 92–134 | 94–134 | 58–128 | 72–121 | 47–134 | 57–111 | |
| – | – | – | 5.51 (0.10) | – | 5.72 (0.15) | |
| 5.1–5.8 | 5.0–6.5 | |||||
* Indicates P < 0.05 vs. non endemic control (CM)
indicates P < 0.05 vs. non endemic control (CN).
Fig 3Mean urinary KIM-1 (μg/g Cr) in the control groups (CM & CN), CKDu groups (EL1-CKDu & EL2-CKDu) with control groups from CKDu emerging locations (C-EL1 & C-El2).
Fig 4Mean urinary NGAL (μg/g Cr) in the control groups (CM & CN), CKDu groups (EL1-CKDu & EL2-CKDu) with control groups from CKDu emerging locations (C-EL1 & C-El2).
Fig 5Association of albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR, mg/g Cr) with urinary KIM-1 (5A), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (ml/min/1.73 m2) with urinary KIM-1 (5B), albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR, mg/g Cr) with urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (5C) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (ml/min/1.73 m2) with urinary NGAL (5D) in the CKDu emerging locations EL1 and EL2.