Literature DB >> 27642769

About the Compatibility between High Voltage Spinel Cathode Materials and Solid Oxide Electrolytes as a Function of Temperature.

Lincoln Miara1, Anna Windmüller2,3, Chih-Long Tsai2,3, William D Richards4, Qianli Ma2,3, Sven Uhlenbruck2,3, Olivier Guillon2,3, Gerbrand Ceder4,5.   

Abstract

The reactivity of mixtures of high voltage spinel cathode materials Li2NiMn3O8, Li2FeMn3O8, and LiCoMnO4 cosintered with Li1.5Al0.5Ti1.5(PO4)3 and Li6.6La3Zr1.6Ta0.4O12 electrolytes is studied by thermal analysis using X-ray-diffraction and differential thermoanalysis and thermogravimetry coupled with mass spectrometry. The results are compared with predicted decomposition reactions from first-principles calculations. Decomposition of the mixtures begins at 600 °C, significantly lower than the decomposition temperature of any component, especially the electrolytes. For the cathode + Li6.6La3Zr1.6Ta0.4O12 mixtures, lithium and oxygen from the electrolyte react with the cathodes to form highly stable Li2MnO3 and then decompose to form stable and often insulating phases such as La2Zr2O7, La2O3, La3TaO7, TiO2, and LaMnO3 which are likely to increase the interfacial impedance of a cathode composite. The decomposition reactions are identified with high fidelity by first-principles calculations. For the cathode + Li1.5Al0.5Ti1.5(PO4)3 mixtures, the Mn tends to oxidize to MnO2 or Mn2O3, supplying lithium to the electrolyte for the formation of Li3PO4 and metal phosphates such as AlPO4 and LiMPO4 (M = Mn, Ni). The results indicate that high temperature cosintering to form dense cathode composites between spinel cathodes and oxide electrolytes will produce high impedance interfacial products, complicating solid state battery manufacturing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atomistic modeling; garnet; interfacial reactivity; solid electrolyte; solid ion conductor

Year:  2016        PMID: 27642769     DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b09059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces        ISSN: 1944-8244            Impact factor:   9.229


  6 in total

Review 1.  Building Better Batteries in the Solid State: A Review.

Authors:  Alain Mauger; Christian M Julien; Andrea Paolella; Michel Armand; Karim Zaghib
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 2.  Physical Vapor Deposition in Solid-State Battery Development: From Materials to Devices.

Authors:  Sandra Lobe; Alexander Bauer; Sven Uhlenbruck; Dina Fattakhova-Rohlfing
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 3.  Theory-guided experimental design in battery materials research.

Authors:  Alex Yong Sheng Eng; Chhail Bihari Soni; Yanwei Lum; Edwin Khoo; Zhenpeng Yao; S K Vineeth; Vipin Kumar; Jun Lu; Christopher S Johnson; Christopher Wolverton; Zhi Wei Seh
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 14.957

4.  Zr- and Ce-doped Li6Y(BO3)3 electrolyte for all-solid-state lithium-ion battery.

Authors:  Toyoki Okumura; Yoshitaka Shiba; Noriko Sakamoto; Takeshi Kobayashi; Saori Hashimoto; Kentaro Doguchi; Harunobu Ogaki; Tomonari Takeuchi; Hironori Kobayashi
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.361

5.  Perspective on design and technical challenges of Li-garnet solid-state batteries.

Authors:  Kostiantyn V Kravchyk; Maksym V Kovalenko
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 8.090

6.  On the feasibility of all-solid-state batteries with LLZO as a single electrolyte.

Authors:  Kostiantyn V Kravchyk; Dogan Tarik Karabay; Maksym V Kovalenko
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.