Literature DB >> 27642762

Lifestyle intervention effects on the frequency and duration of daily moderate-vigorous physical activity and leisure screen time.

David E Conroy1, Donald Hedeker2, H G McFadden3, Christine A Pellegrini3, Angela F Pfammatter3, Siobhan M Phillips3, Juned Siddique3, Bonnie Spring3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: How a healthy lifestyle intervention changes the frequency and duration of daily moderate-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behavior has not been well characterized. Secondary analyses of data from the Make Better Choices randomized controlled trial were conducted to evaluate how interventions to increase physical activity or reduce leisure screen time affected the frequency and duration of these behaviors during treatment initiation and follow-up.
METHOD: Participants were 202 adults who exhibited insufficient physical activity, excessive screen time and poor diet during a 14-day baseline screening period. The design was a randomized controlled trial with a 3-week intervention period followed by eight 3- to 7-day bursts of data collection over the 6-month follow-up period after intervention termination. Participants self-reported on their physical activity and screen time at the end of each day.
RESULTS: A 2-part multilevel model indicated that, relative to baseline levels, the physical activity intervention increased the odds of daily moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity (frequency) but not the duration of activity during the intervention period and these effects persisted (albeit somewhat more weakly) during the follow-up period. The screen time intervention reduced both the frequency and duration of daily screen time from the beginning of the intervention through the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: A 3-week intervention increased daily physical activity frequency but not duration, and reduced both the frequency and duration of daily leisure screen time. These effects were maintained over 20 weeks following the end of the intervention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27642762      PMCID: PMC5357594          DOI: 10.1037/hea0000418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  41 in total

Review 1.  Physical activity for health: What kind? How much? How intense? On top of what?

Authors:  Kenneth E Powell; Amanda E Paluch; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004.

Authors:  Charles E Matthews; Kong Y Chen; Patty S Freedson; Maciej S Buchowski; Bettina M Beech; Russell R Pate; Richard P Troiano
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Dose response between physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jacob Sattelmair; Jeremy Pertman; Eric L Ding; Harold W Kohl; William Haskell; I-Min Lee
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Human agency in social cognitive theory.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1989-09

5.  Control theory: a useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology.

Authors:  C S Carver; M F Scheier
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  A daily process analysis of intentions and physical activity in college students.

Authors:  David E Conroy; Steriani Elavsky; Shawna E Doerksen; Jaclyn P Maher
Journal:  J Sport Exerc Psychol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.016

Review 7.  Interventions with potential to reduce sedentary time in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anne Martin; Claire Fitzsimons; Ruth Jepson; David H Saunders; Hidde P van der Ploeg; Pedro J Teixeira; Cindy M Gray; Nanette Mutrie
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 8.  The effectiveness of financial incentives for health behaviour change: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma L Giles; Shannon Robalino; Elaine McColl; Falko F Sniehotta; Jean Adams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Personal financial incentives for changing habitual health-related behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eleni Mantzari; Florian Vogt; Ian Shemilt; Yinghui Wei; Julian P T Higgins; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 10.  A systematic review of measures of self-reported adherence to unsupervised home-based rehabilitation exercise programmes, and their psychometric properties.

Authors:  Jessica C Bollen; Sarah G Dean; Richard J Siegert; Tracey E Howe; Victoria A Goodwin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  3 in total

1.  Modelling multiple health behavior change with network analyses: results from a one-year study conducted among overweight and obese adults.

Authors:  Guillaume Chevance; Natalie M Golaszewski; Dario Baretta; Eric B Hekler; Britta A Larsen; Kevin Patrick; Job Godino
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2020-01-29

2.  Interventions outside the workplace for reducing sedentary behaviour in adults under 60 years of age.

Authors:  Elaine M Murtagh; Marie H Murphy; Karen Milton; Nia W Roberts; Clodagh Sm O'Gorman; Charles Foster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-17

3.  Personalized Physical Activity Coaching: A Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Talko B Dijkhuis; Frank J Blaauw; Miriam W van Ittersum; Hugo Velthuijsen; Marco Aiello
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.