Literature DB >> 27642640

Multi-omics approach to infer cancer therapeutic targets on chromosome 20q across tumor types.

Antoine M Snijders1, Jian-Hua Mao1.   

Abstract

The identification of good targets is a critical step for the development of targeted therapies for cancer treatment. Here, we used a multi-omics approach to delineate potential targets on chromosome 20q, which frequently shows a complex pattern of DNA copy number amplification in many human cancers suggesting the presence of multiple driver genes. By comparing the amounts of individual mRNAs in cancer from 11 different human tissues with those in their corresponding normal tissues, we identified 18 genes that were robustly elevated across human cancers. Moreover, we found that higher expression levels of a majority of these genes were associated with poor prognosis in many human cancer types. Using DNA copy number and expression data for all 18 genes obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas project, we discovered that amplification is a major mechanism driving overexpression of these 18 genes in the majority of human cancers. Our integrated analysis suggests that 18 genes on chromosome 20q might serve as novel potential molecular targets for targeted cancer therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioinformatics; cancer; chromosome 20q; omics; therapeutic targets

Year:  2016        PMID: 27642640      PMCID: PMC5025263          DOI: 10.18282/amor.v2.i4.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Mod Oncol Res


Introduction

Targeted therapy is a newer type of cancer treatment that uses drugs or other substances to more precisely identify and attack cancer cells, usually while doing little damage to normal cells. However, the development of targeted therapies requires the identification of good targets. A few approaches can be used to discover potential targets. The first is to identify abnormalities in chromosomes (such as translocation) that are present in cancer cells but not in normal cells. Chromosome translocations can lead to fusion proteins, which are potential targets for targeted therapies. For example, Gleevec® targets the BCR-ABL fusion protein for treating some leukemia cells that contain BCR-ABL translocation[. The second approach is to identify the gene mutations that drive cancer progression. An example is the BRAF V600E mutation, which is present in a wide range of cancers including a high percentage of malignant melanomas[. Vemurafenib targets this mutant form of the BRAF protein and it has been approved for treating patients with inoperable or metastatic melanoma that contains this altered BRAF protein[. Finally, by comparing the amounts of individual proteins in cancer cells with those in normal cells, one can identify proteins that are more or less abundant in cancer cells. An example of such a differentially expressed target is the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 protein (HER-2). HER-2 is expressed at high levels on the surface of some cancer cells. Several targeted therapies are directed against HER-2 including trastuzumab, which is approved to treat certain breast and stomach cancers that overexpress HER-2[. Microarray and next generation sequencing technologies have become invaluable tools used to catalog these genomic abnormalities occurring in human cancers, and they can be used to identify new potential therapeutic targets. The availability of large cancer genomic data sets allows for unbiased approaches to identify genes that are important in tumor progression. Gene transcript-based signatures that predict prognosis have successfully been developed for many different tumor types. However, it remains a challenge to distinguish cancer driver genes from passenger genes; the latter referring to genes that are correlated (in expression) to driver genes and are likely prognostic biomarkers but are, nonetheless, not actively contributing to the carcinogenic process. An essential early step in the pathogenesis of most cancers is losing one of the defense mechanisms that controls the integrity of the genome, making it possible for a cell to rapidly acquire genomic changes. In a majority of epithelial cancers, genomic instability occurs at the chromosomal level, affecting numerous genes and thereby causing tumor progression. Amplifications — defined as regions of focal high-level DNA copy number change — are likely to represent aberrations under continuous selection for tumor growth since amplified DNA is unstable[. Thus, gene amplifications focus on genes that exist in a region with candidate oncogenes contributing to cancer development. DNA amplifications on chromosome 20q are often observed in many human cancers, suggesting that genes which reside on chromosome 20q play a causal role in tumorigenesis. Moreover, 20q amplifications are often highly complex, indicating the presence of multiple genes is important in tumor development[. Here, we aggregated available cancer databases to identify cancer driver genes across tumor types by combining gene transcript and DNA copy number across chromosome 20q to select tumor-type specific signatures that predict patient prognosis. Our strategy identified critical genes and pathways in tumor development that are important for designing better treatment strategies.

Materials and methods

Gene transcript data of normal (non-tumor) and tumor tissues across 11 different tumor types were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information's (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). They include: brain, GSE4290 (tumor vs. healthy donor); breast, GSE10780 (tumor vs. adjacent normal) and GSE3744 (tumor vs. healthy donor); colon, GSE8671 (tumor vs. adjacent normal); gastric, GSE13911 (tumor vs. adjacent normal); head and neck, GSE6791 (tumor vs. healthy donor) and GSE12452 (tumor vs. healthy donor); liver, GSE6764 (tumor vs. healthy donor); lung, GSE31210 (tumor vs. adjacent normal) and GSE19188 (tumor vs. adjacent normal); ovarian, GSE14407 (tumor vs. healthy donor); cervix, GSE6791 (tumor vs. healthy donor); pancreas, GSE16515 (tumor vs. adjacent normal); and prostate cancer, GSE3325 (tumor vs. healthy donor). Fold change was calculated for each gene and its significance was tested using t-test (p < 0.05). Survival multivariate analysis and risk assessment for individual genes and gene signatures in human cancer data sets were performed using SurvExpress[ in the following datasets: ovarian (GSE9891 and GSE32062); head and neck (TCGA and E-MTAB-1328); breast (TCGA and GSE20685); liver (TCGA and GSE17856); lung adeno-carcinoma (TCGA); lung squamous cell carcinoma (TCGA); pancreatic (GSE28735 and GSE21501); stomach (TCGA); colon (TCGA and GSE17536); brain low-grade glioma (TCGA); brain glioblastoma multiforme (GSE16011); and prostate (MSKCC). Genomic alterations and mRNA expression levels for The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) studies were obtained from cBioPortal[. We used a rank-based non-parametric test (Kruskal-Wallis) to determine whether the gene expression levels were significantly different between the copy number groups (p < 0.05 was used as a threshold for significance). All information concerning these samples can be downloaded from cBioPortal (http://www.cbioportal.org/data_sets.jsp). Gene ontology enrichment analysis was performed using the web-based gene set analysis toolkit (p < 0.05 was used as a threshold for significance)[.

Results

Meta-analysis identified an 18-gene signature frequently upregulated across human tumor types

We conducted a meta-analysis of genes on chromosome 20q that are consistently upregulated across different human tumor types. We collected gene transcript data of normal and tumor tissues across 11 different tumor types including brain, breast, colon, gastric, head and neck, liver, lung, ovarian, cervix, pancreas, and prostate cancers. We calculated the differential expression of all 301 genes present on chromosome 20q for which gene transcript data was available. We then filtered for genes that were upregulated in tumors by at least 1.5 fold (p < 0.05) in seven or more tumor types. This resulted in a gene signature of 18 genes for further downstream analysis (). To identify tumor types that were the strongest contributors to the 18-gene signature, we generated a heatmap of the p-values pertaining to the expression difference between normal and tumor tissues across all tumor types (). We found that breast, lung, gastric, brain, and colon cancers have the strongest expression difference between tumor and normal tissues, while prostate and liver cancers have weaker contributions.

The 18-gene signature is associated with disease-free survival across tumor types

To investigate whether individual genes in our signature were associated with disease-free survival, a log-rank test was performed and the split-point of the patient cohort was chosen, where the p-value between two patient cohorts was the lowest. An example is shown in for the RAE1 gene, where increased expression of RAE1 was associated with decreased disease-free survival in breast, brain, head and neck, lung, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers (p < 0.05). shows a p-values’ heatmap of the prognostic property of each gene within our signature across 10 tumor types (18 total data sets). Increased expression of each gene was associated with disease-free survival in at least three tumor types. The increased expression of TPX2, UBE2C, CSE1L, AURKA, and RAE1 were associated with decreased disease-free survival in at least nine data sets. In some instances, we found that increased gene expression was associated with better prognosis (). For example, the increased expressions of MMP9 and SULF2 (two neighboring genes) were associated with increased survival in five data sets. We then examined whether gene expression of the complete 18-gene signature was associated with cancer patient survival across 12 tumor types. Risk groups were assigned by dividing the patient cohort (ranked by prognostic index) into two equal parts. We observed significant association of our signature with disease-free survival in all 18 independent data sets (0.012 < p < 1.608 × 10−9; ). These data indicated that our signature is broadly predictive for disease-free survival independent of tumor type.

Increase in DNA copy number as a mechanism for increased expression

A variety of mechanisms can result in a change in gene expression, which modifies tumor growth and progression and these include point mutations, epigenetic alterations, genomic rearrangements, and DNA copy number aberrations. For example, it has been shown that gene amplifications are under continuous selection pressures and when the selection pressure is removed, amplifications are not maintained and eventually disappear. Thus, amplifications focus on those genes that are important for tumor development. To identify whether gene amplification was associated with increased gene expression within our 18-gene signature, we used a rank-based non-parametric test to determine the significance of differences in gene expression between tumors for each gene, with and without an increase in gene copy number. For example, the RAE1 expression was found to be significantly associated with DNA copy number in 20 tumor types (). The p-values’ heatmap of the rank-based test is shown in for all 18 genes across 21 tumor types. Strong associations between the DNA copy number and gene expression were observed in the majority of tumor types, whereas sparse associations were observed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PCPG), and thyroid cancer (THCA) (). Elevated DNA copy numbers of MMP9 and SULF2 were associated with increased gene expressions in only two and seven tumor types, respectively. Unsurprisingly, in AML, the RAE1 expression was not significantly associated with the copy number since the RAE1 copy number was only observed in one tumor (although the RAE1 expression in that tumor was increased compared to tumors without the RAE1 copy number gain). This analysis showed that the DNA copy number is a major mechanism for our 18-gene signature on chromosome 20q, by which cells increase gene expression levels as they progress toward malignancy.

Discussion

The identification of good targets for the development of targeted therapies remains difficult. Cancer genome analysis has shown great promise in identifying key aberrations in tumor growth and survival pathways that could serve as targets for therapeutic intervention. Our integrated multi-omics analysis of genes on chromosome 20q identified 18 genes that might serve as novel potential molecular targets for targeted therapy. Gene ontology analysis revealed significant enrichment of cell cycle and mitosis-related biological processes in our 18-gene signature (), suggesting that a cluster of functionally related genes localize to chromosome 20q. In addition, a number of these genes have previously been identified as oncogenes, including: AURKA, UBE2C, TPX2, FAM83D, ZNF217, SALL4, MMP9, and therapeutic targets: AURKA and UBE2C. Our analysis identified several well-known oncogenes that are involved in mitosis, including: AURKA, DSN1, UBE2C, FAM83D, TPX2, and MYBL2. AURKA, a mitotic spindle-associated kinase that regulates key events during mitosis is frequently over-expressed in cancer and is associated with aneuploidy in cancer cells, suppression of apoptosis and enhancing proliferation, and cell survival[. Our gene signature also identified the microtubule-associated protein TPX2, which binds AURKA and targets it to the mitotic spindles[. A number of inhibitors targeting AURKA have been developed and are currently evaluated in clinical trials[. In addition, our analysis also identified RAE1, an essential mitotic checkpoint regulator involved in spindle organization[. A meta-analysis of ZNF217 and SALL4 (both identified in our study) concluded that their over-expressions were associated with poor survival across different tumor types[. Furthermore, in vitro studies showed that the overexpression of ZNF217 in mammary epithelial cells drives many of the hallmarks associated with cancer progression, whereas knockdown studies of SALL4 were shown to inhibit proliferation[. SULF2 is a sulfatase that can edit the sulfation pattern of heparin sulfate proteoglycans on the outside of the cell, thus affecting key signaling pathways[. Furthermore, SULF2 was recently shown to be a diagnostic and prognostic marker in lung cancer[. Similarly, the overexpression of CSE1L on chromosome 20q has been suggested to predict distant metastasis in breast cancer[. Mechanistically, CSE1L regulates the association of alpha and beta-tubulin and its increased expression increases the extension of MCF-7 breast cancer cell protrusions, thereby promoting migration[. It has been reported that the FAM83D expression is elevated in various cancers[. Moreover, higher levels of FAM83D expression positively correlate with a poor prognosis in many cancer types[. Two recent studies have identified FAM83D as a prognostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma[. Furthermore, higher levels of FAM83D have been significantly associated with shorter overall and metastatic relapse-free survival, particularly in patients with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and luminal subtype tumors[. Forced expression of FAM83D in non-malignant cells in culture promoted the proliferation and invasion of breast cancer cells, and down-regulated the expression of tumor suppressor gene, FBXW7[. The observation that gene expression of the complete 18-gene signature was more significantly associated with cancer patient survival compared to individual genes suggests that multiple genes independently contribute to the overall survival. These data are consistent with the complex pattern of DNA copy number amplifications often observed on chromosome 20q and the presence of multiple driver genes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our integrative multi-omics analysis of genes on chromosome 20q is paving the way to the development of additional therapeutic targets for cancers with 20q amplifications. This analysis pipeline could furthermore be potentially applied to other tumor amplicons.
  32 in total

Review 1.  Aurora kinase inhibitors as anticancer molecules.

Authors:  Hiroshi Katayama; Subrata Sen
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-09-20

2.  A Rae1-containing ribonucleoprotein complex is required for mitotic spindle assembly.

Authors:  Michael D Blower; Maxence Nachury; Rebecca Heald; Karsten Weis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  FAM83D activates the MEK/ERK signaling pathway and promotes cell proliferation in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Dong Wang; Sheng Han; Rui Peng; Xing Wang; Xin-Xiang Yang; Ren-Jie Yang; Chen-Yu Jiao; Dong Ding; Gu-Wei Ji; Xiang-Cheng Li
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Shaping of tumor and drug-resistant genomes by instability and selection.

Authors:  Antoine M Snijders; Jane Fridlyand; Dorus A Mans; Richard Segraves; Ajay N Jain; Daniel Pinkel; Donna G Albertson
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-07-10       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer.

Authors:  Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Targeted chronic myeloid leukemia therapy: Seeking a cure.

Authors:  Christopher Fausel
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 2.637

7.  Rae1 is an essential mitotic checkpoint regulator that cooperates with Bub3 to prevent chromosome missegregation.

Authors:  J Ramesh Babu; Karthik B Jeganathan; Darren J Baker; Xiaosheng Wu; Ningling Kang-Decker; Jan M van Deursen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 8.  The dark side of ZNF217, a key regulator of tumorigenesis with powerful biomarker value.

Authors:  Pascale A Cohen; Caterina F Donini; Nhan T Nguyen; Hubert Lincet; Julie A Vendrell
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-12-08

9.  WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt): update 2013.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Dexter Duncan; Zhiao Shi; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Oncogenic protein SALL4 and ZNF217 as prognostic indicators in solid cancers: a meta‑analysis of individual studies.

Authors:  Ji Cheng; Jinbo Gao; Xiaoming Shuai; Kaixiong Tao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-26
View more
  3 in total

1.  Upregulation of LINC00659 expression predicts a poor prognosis and promotes migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  Pihai Gong; Ying Xu; Min Liu; Xiaohui Shen; Yuhang Mao; Yiping Li; Kun Zhang; Shenling Yu; Hong Fan
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Butyrate supplementation regulates expression of chromosome segregation 1‑like protein to reverse the genetic distortion caused by p53 mutations in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Chun-Chao Chang; Wei-Yu Kao; Chih-Yi Liu; Hui-Hsien Su; Yu-An Kan; Pao-Ying Lin; Wei-Chi Ku; Kang-Wei Chang; Ruey-Neng Yang; Chi-Jung Huang
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.884

3.  Analysis of Copy-Number Variations and Feline Mammary Carcinoma Survival.

Authors:  Hugo Murua Escobar; Ingo Nolte; José Luis Granados-Soler; Kirsten Bornemann-Kolatzki; Julia Beck; Bertram Brenig; Ekkehard Schütz; Daniela Betz; Johannes Junginger; Marion Hewicker-Trautwein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.