| Literature DB >> 27642623 |
Mark G Athanason1, Stanley M Stevens1, Brant R Burkhardt1.
Abstract
This article contains raw and processed data related to research published in "Quantitative Proteomic Profiling Reveals Hepatic Lipogenesis and Liver X Receptor Activation in the PANDER Transgenic Model" (M.G. Athanason, W.A. Ratliff, D. Chaput, C.B. MarElia, M.N. Kuehl, S.M., Jr. Stevens, B.R. Burkhardt (2016)) [1], and was generated by "spike-in" SILAC-based proteomic analysis of livers obtained from the PANcreatic-Derived factor (PANDER) transgenic mouse (PANTG) under various metabolic conditions [1]. The mass spectrometry output of the PANTG and wild-type B6SJLF mice liver tissue and resulting proteome search from MaxQuant 1.2.2.5 employing the Andromeda search algorithm against the UniprotKB reference database for Mus musculus has been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://www.proteomexchange.org) via the PRIDE partner repository with dataset identifiers PRIDE: PXD004171 and doi:10.6019/PXD004171. Protein ratio values representing PANTG/wild-type obtained by MaxQuant analysis were input into the Perseus processing suite to determine statistical significance using the Significance A outlier test (p<0.05). Differentially expressed proteins using this approach were input into Ingenuity Pathway Analysis to determined altered pathways and upstream regulators that were altered in PANTG mice.Entities:
Keywords: FAM3B; Lipogenesis; Liver; PANDER; Proteomics; Transgenic
Year: 2016 PMID: 27642623 PMCID: PMC5018088 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.08.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1Identification of unique proteins across metabolic states in PANTG. SILAC spike in fractionated protein extracts were analyzed by LC-MS/MS from age- and gender-matched wild-type and PANTG mice (n=3 per metabolic condition and genotype). Approximately 3300 proteins were confidently revealed that were shared across genotype and metabolic conditions with overlap indicated in Venn diagram.
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility |