| Literature DB >> 27642356 |
Erica C Larson1, Christopher D Pond1, Prem P Rai2, Teatulohi K Matainaho3, Pius Piskaut4, Michael R Franklin1, Louis R Barrows5.
Abstract
The hypothesis underlying this current work is that fresh juice expressed from Papua New Guinea (PNG) medicinal plants (succus) will inhibit human Cytochrome P450s (CYPs). The CYP inhibitory activity identified in fresh material was compared with inhibition in methanol extracts of dried material. Succus is the most common method of traditional medicine (TM) preparation for consumption in PNG. There is increasing concern that TMs might antagonize or complicate drug therapy. We have previously shown that methanol extracts of commonly consumed PNG medicinal plants are able to induce and/or inhibit human CYPs in vitro. In this current work plant succus was prepared from fresh plant leaves. Inhibition of three major CYPs was determined using human liver microsomes and enzyme-selective model substrates. Of 15 species tested, succus from 6/15 was found to inhibit CYP1A2, 7/15 inhibited CYP3A4, and 4/15 inhibited CYP2D6. Chi-squared tests determined differences in inhibitory activity between succus and methanol preparations. Over 80% agreement was found. Thus, fresh juice from PNG medicinal plants does exhibit the potential to complicate drug therapy in at risk populations. Further, the general reproducibility of these findings suggests that methanol extraction of dried material is a reasonable surrogate preparation method for fresh plant samples.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27642356 PMCID: PMC5013206 DOI: 10.1155/2016/7869710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
CYP inhibition across methanol (M) and succus (S) studies.
| Genus and species | M/S | CYP1A2 | Inh? | CYP3A4 | Inh? | CYP2D6 | Inh? | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MR (2.0 | MR (0.4 | 7-BQ (500 | 7-BQ (100 | MAMC (100 | MAMC (40 | |||||
|
| M | — | — | N# | — | — | N# | — | — | N# |
|
| M | — | — | N# | — | — | N# | — | 51 | Y† |
|
| S | — | — | N## | — | — | N## | — | — | N## |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| M | 74 | 86 | Y† | — | 79 | Y† | 52 | 60 | Y† |
|
| S | 61 | 86 | Y‡ | — | 79 | Y‡ | 70 | — | Y‡ |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| M | — | 54 | Y† | — | — | N# | 56 | 61 | Y† |
|
| M | 58 | 75 | Y† | — | 57 | Y† | 54 | — | Y† |
|
| S | — | 58 | Y‡ | — | 62 | Y‡ | 50 | 83 | Y‡ |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| M | 66 | 65 | Y† | 54 | 61 | Y† | — | 54 | Y† |
|
| S | 70 | 80 | Y‡ | — | 74 | Y‡ | — | — | N## |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| M | — | — | N# | — | — | N# | — | — | N# |
|
| M | — | — | N# | — | — | N# | — | — | N# |
|
| S | — | — | N## | — | — | N## | — | — | N## |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| M | — | — | N# | — | — | N# | — | — | N# |
|
| S | — | — | N## | — | — | N## | — | — | N## |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| M | — | — | N# | — | — | N# | — | — | N# |
|
| S | — | — | N## | — | — | N## | — | — | N## |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| M | — | — | N# | — | — | N# | — | — | N# |
|
| S | — | — | N## | — | — | N## | — | — | N## |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| M | 56 | 69 | Y† | 58 | 60 | Y† | — | — | N# |
|
| S | — | — | N## | — | 70 | Y‡ | — | — | N## |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| M | — | — | N# | — | — | N# | — | — | N# |
|
| S | — | — | N## | — | — | N## | — | — | N## |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| M | — | — | N# | — | — | N# | — | — | N# |
|
| S | — | 56 | Y‡ | — | — | N## | — | — | N## |
|
| S | — | — | N## | — | — | N## | — | — | N## |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| M | — | — | N# | — | 51 | Y† | — | — | N# |
|
| S | — | 52 | Y‡ | — | 59 | Y‡ | — | 52 | Y‡ |
|
| S | — | 64 | Y‡ | — | 69 | Y‡ | 55 | 62 | Y‡ |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| M | 53 | 68 | Y† | — | — | N# | — | — | N# |
|
| S | — | — | N## | — | — | N## | — | — | N## |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| M | 54 | 75 | Y† | — | — | N# | — | — | N# |
|
| S | — | — | N## | — | 60 | Y‡ | — | — | N## |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| M | 96 | 92 | Y† | 64 | 80 | Y† | 67 | 81 | Y† |
|
| S | 84 | 76 | Y‡ | 73 | 87 | Y‡ | 55 | 68 | Y‡ |
Inhibition indicated by “†” (for M study) and“‡” (for S study). No inhibition indicated by “#” (for M study) and“##” (for S study).
(—) activity was <50% inhibition.
Figure 1Comparison of CYP inhibitory activity based on TM preparation method.