Meng Wang1, Joshua P Keller2, Sara D Adar3, Sun-Young Kim4, Timothy V Larson5, Casey Olives1, Paul D Sampson6, Lianne Sheppard7, Adam A Szpiro2, Sverre Vedal1, Joel D Kaufman1. 1. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 4. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. 5. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 6. Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 7. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current epidemiologic studies rely on simple ozone metrics which may not appropriately capture population ozone exposure. For understanding health effects of long-term ozone exposure in population studies, it is advantageous for exposure estimation to incorporate the complex spatiotemporal pattern of ozone concentrations at fine scales. OBJECTIVE: To develop a geo-statistical exposure prediction model that predicts fine scale spatiotemporal variations of ambient ozone in six United States metropolitan regions. METHODS: We developed a modeling framework that estimates temporal trends from regulatory agency and cohort-specific monitoring data from MESA Air measurement campaigns and incorporates land use regression with universal kriging using predictor variables from a large geographic database. The cohort-specific data were measured at home and community locations. The framework was applied in estimating two-week average ozone concentrations from 1999 to 2013 in models of each of the six MESA Air metropolitan regions. RESULTS: Ozone models perform well in both spatial and temporal dimensions at the agency monitoring sites in terms of prediction accuracy. City-specific leave-one (site)-out cross-validation R2 accounting for temporal and spatial variability ranged from 0.65 to 0.88 in the six regions. For predictions at the home sites, the R2 is between 0.60 and 0.91 for cross-validation that left out 10% of home sites in turn. The predicted ozone concentrations vary substantially over space and time in all the metropolitan regions. CONCLUSION: Using the available data, our spatiotemporal models are able to accurately predict long-term ozone concentrations at fine spatial scales in multiple regions. The model predictions will allow for investigation of the long-term health effects of ambient ozone concentrations in future epidemiological studies.
BACKGROUND: Current epidemiologic studies rely on simple ozone metrics which may not appropriately capture population ozone exposure. For understanding health effects of long-term ozone exposure in population studies, it is advantageous for exposure estimation to incorporate the complex spatiotemporal pattern of ozone concentrations at fine scales. OBJECTIVE: To develop a geo-statistical exposure prediction model that predicts fine scale spatiotemporal variations of ambient ozone in six United States metropolitan regions. METHODS: We developed a modeling framework that estimates temporal trends from regulatory agency and cohort-specific monitoring data from MESA Air measurement campaigns and incorporates land use regression with universal kriging using predictor variables from a large geographic database. The cohort-specific data were measured at home and community locations. The framework was applied in estimating two-week average ozone concentrations from 1999 to 2013 in models of each of the six MESA Air metropolitan regions. RESULTS:Ozone models perform well in both spatial and temporal dimensions at the agency monitoring sites in terms of prediction accuracy. City-specific leave-one (site)-out cross-validation R2 accounting for temporal and spatial variability ranged from 0.65 to 0.88 in the six regions. For predictions at the home sites, the R2 is between 0.60 and 0.91 for cross-validation that left out 10% of home sites in turn. The predicted ozone concentrations vary substantially over space and time in all the metropolitan regions. CONCLUSION: Using the available data, our spatiotemporal models are able to accurately predict long-term ozone concentrations at fine spatial scales in multiple regions. The model predictions will allow for investigation of the long-term health effects of ambient ozone concentrations in future epidemiological studies.
Authors: Rob Beelen; Gerard Hoek; Edzer Pebesma; Danielle Vienneau; Kees de Hoogh; David J Briggs Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2009-01-18 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Jules Kerckhoffs; Meng Wang; Kees Meliefste; Ebba Malmqvist; Paul Fischer; Nicole A H Janssen; Rob Beelen; Gerard Hoek Journal: Environ Res Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Michael Jerrett; Richard T Burnett; Bernardo S Beckerman; Michelle C Turner; Daniel Krewski; George Thurston; Randall V Martin; Aaron van Donkelaar; Edward Hughes; Yuanli Shi; Susan M Gapstur; Michael J Thun; C Arden Pope Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Adam A Szpiro; Paul D Sampson; Lianne Sheppard; Thomas Lumley; Sara D Adar; Joel Kaufman Journal: Environmetrics Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Michael Jerrett; Richard T Burnett; C Arden Pope; Kazuhiko Ito; George Thurston; Daniel Krewski; Yuanli Shi; Eugenia Calle; Michael Thun Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-03-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joel D Kaufman; Sara D Adar; Ryan W Allen; R Graham Barr; Matthew J Budoff; Gregory L Burke; Adrian M Casillas; Martin A Cohen; Cynthia L Curl; Martha L Daviglus; Ana V Diez Roux; David R Jacobs; Richard A Kronmal; Timothy V Larson; Sally Lee-Jane Liu; Thomas Lumley; Ana Navas-Acien; Daniel H O'Leary; Jerome I Rotter; Paul D Sampson; Lianne Sheppard; David S Siscovick; James H Stein; Adam A Szpiro; Russell P Tracy Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Ariane Adam-Poupart; Allan Brand; Michel Fournier; Michael Jerrett; Audrey Smargiassi Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-05-30 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Kai Zhang; Timothy V Larson; Amanda Gassett; Adam A Szpiro; Martha Daviglus; Gregory L Burke; Joel D Kaufman; Sara D Adar Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Joel D Kaufman; Elizabeth W Spalt; Cynthia L Curl; Anjum Hajat; Miranda R Jones; Sun-Young Kim; Sverre Vedal; Adam A Szpiro; Amanda Gassett; Lianne Sheppard; Martha L Daviglus; Sara D Adar Journal: Glob Heart Date: 2016-09
Authors: Meng Wang; Carrie Pistenmaa Aaron; Jaime Madrigano; Eric A Hoffman; Elsa Angelini; Jie Yang; Andrew Laine; Thomas M Vetterli; Patrick L Kinney; Paul D Sampson; Lianne E Sheppard; Adam A Szpiro; Sara D Adar; Kipruto Kirwa; Benjamin Smith; David J Lederer; Ana V Diez-Roux; Sverre Vedal; Joel D Kaufman; R Graham Barr Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Daniel C Belz; Han Woo; Nirupama Putcha; Laura M Paulin; Kirsten Koehler; Ashraf Fawzy; Neil E Alexis; R Graham Barr; Alejandro P Comellas; Christopher B Cooper; David Couper; Mark Dransfield; Amanda J Gassett; MeiLan Han; Eric A Hoffman; Richard E Kanner; Jerry A Krishnan; Fernando J Martinez; Robert Paine; Roger D Peng; Stephen Peters; Cheryl S Pirozzi; Prescott G Woodruff; Joel D Kaufman; Nadia N Hansel Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2022-03-19 Impact factor: 10.753
Authors: Meng Wang; Paul D Sampson; Jianlin Hu; Michael Kleeman; Joshua P Keller; Casey Olives; Adam A Szpiro; Sverre Vedal; Joel D Kaufman Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2016-04-26 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Sheena E Martenies; Joshua P Keller; Sherry WeMott; Grace Kuiper; Zev Ross; William B Allshouse; John L Adgate; Anne P Starling; Dana Dabelea; Sheryl Magzamen Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Joshua P Keller; Timothy V Larson; Elena Austin; R Graham Barr; Lianne Sheppard; Sverre Vedal; Joel D Kaufman; Adam A Szpiro Journal: Environ Epidemiol Date: 2018-07-09
Authors: Meng Wang; Paul D Sampson; Lianne E Sheppard; James H Stein; Sverre Vedal; Joel D Kaufman Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Jianzhao Bi; Christopher Zuidema; David Clausen; Kipruto Kirwa; Michael T Young; Amanda J Gassett; Edmund Y W Seto; Paul D Sampson; Timothy V Larson; Adam A Szpiro; Lianne Sheppard; Joel D Kaufman Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2022-09-28 Impact factor: 11.035