Literature DB >> 27641942

Starclose SE® hemostasis after 6F direct antegrade superficial femoral artery access distal to the femoral head for peripheral endovascular procedures in obese patients.

Stavros Spiliopoulos1, Panagiotis Kitrou, Nikolaos Christeas, Dimitris Karnabatidis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Direct superficial femoral artery (SFA) antegrade puncture is a valid alternative to common femoral artery (CFA) access for peripheral vascular interventions. Data investigating vascular closure device (VCD) hemostasis of distant SFA 6F access are limited. We aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the Starclose SE® VCD for hemostasis, following direct 6F antegrade SFA access distal to the femoral head.
METHODS: This prospective, single-center study included patients who were not suitable for CFA puncture and were scheduled to undergo peripheral endovascular interventions using direct antegrade SFA 6F access, at least 2 cm below the inferior edge of femoral head. Hemostasis was obtained with the Starclose SE® VCD (Abbott Laboratories). Primary endpoints were successful hemostasis rate and periprocedural (30-day) major complication rate. Secondary endpoint was the rate of minor complications. Clinical and Doppler ultrasound follow-up was performed at discharge and at one month.
RESULTS: Between September 2014 and August 2015, a total of 30 patients (21 male; 70.0%) with a mean body mass index of 41.2 kg/m2 were enrolled. Mean age was 72±9 years (range, 67-88 years). Most patients suffered from critical limb ischemia (87.1%) and diabetes (61.3%). Calcifications were present in eight cases (26.6%). Reason for direct SFA puncture was obesity (100%). Successful hemostasis was achieved in 100% of the cases. No major complications were noted after one-month follow-up. Minor complications included two <5 cm hematomas (6.6%) not necessitating treatment.
CONCLUSION: In this prospective study, Starclose SE® VCD was safe and effective for hemostasis of antegrade direct SFA puncture. Uncomplicated hemostasis was achieved even in cases of puncturing 2 to 7 cm below the inferior edge of the femoral head.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27641942      PMCID: PMC5098949          DOI: 10.5152/dir.2016.15614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1305-3825            Impact factor:   2.630


  21 in total

Review 1.  Complications related to femoral artery access for transcatheter procedures.

Authors:  Patrick A Stone; John E Campbell
Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 1.089

2.  Feasibility and safety of vascular closure devices in an antegrade approach to either the common femoral artery or the superficial femoral artery.

Authors:  Andreas Gutzeit; Bram van Schie; Eric Schoch; Klaus Hergan; Nicole Graf; Christoph A Binkert
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Below-the-knee interventions.

Authors:  H van Overhagen; S Spiliopoulos; D Tsetis
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  The Use of ExoSeal Vascular Closure Device for Direct Antegrade Superficial Femoral Artery Puncture Site Hemostasis.

Authors:  Uri Rimon; Boris Khaitovich; Dmitry Yakubovich; Paul Bensaid; Gil Golan; Daniel Silverberg
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Standards of practice for superficial femoral and popliteal artery angioplasty and stenting.

Authors:  Konstantinos Katsanos; Gunnar Tepe; Dimitris Tsetis; Fabrizio Fanelli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula after femoral artery catheterization: association with low femoral punctures.

Authors:  R S Altin; S Flicker; H J Naidech
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Does ultrasound-guided lidocaine injection improve local anaesthesia before femoral artery catheterization?

Authors:  S Spiliopoulos; K Katsanos; A Diamantopoulos; D Karnabatidis; D Siablis
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Antegrade access to the superficial femoral artery with ultrasound guidance: feasibility and safety.

Authors:  Andreas Gutzeit; Eric Schoch; Thomas Sautter; Regula Jenelten; Nicole Graf; Christoph A Binkert
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Access to the superficial femoral artery in the presence of a "hostile groin": a prospective study.

Authors:  Adrian J Marcus; Kevin Lotzof; Adam Howard
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Antegrade superficial femoral artery versus common femoral artery punctures for infrainguinal occlusive disease.

Authors:  Michelle Kweon; Venu Bhamidipaty; Andrew Holden; Andrew A Hill
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  1 in total

1.  CIRSE Standards of Practice on Below-the-Knee Revascularisation.

Authors:  Stavros Spiliopoulos; Costantino Del Giudice; Marco Manzi; Lazaros Reppas; Thomas Rodt; Raman Uberoi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 2.740

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.