| Literature DB >> 27641515 |
Orestes Quesada1, Carol González-Freire2, María Carla Ferrer3, José O Colón-Sáez4, Emily Fernández-García3, Juan Mercado3, Alejandro Dávila3, Reginald Morales2, José A Lasalde-Dominicci2,3,5.
Abstract
This study compares the lipid composition, including individual phospholipid molecular species of solubilized nAChR detergent complexes (nAChR-DCs) with those of the bulk lipids from their source, Torpedo californica (Tc) electric tissue. This lipidomic analysis revealed seventy-seven (77) phospholipid species in the Tc tissue. Analysis of affinity-purified nAChR-DCs prepared with C-12 to C-16 phospholipid analog detergents alkylphosphocholine (FC) and lysofoscholine (LFC) demonstrated that nAChR-DCs prepared with FC12, LFC14, and LFC16 contained >60 phospholipids/nAChR, which was more than twice of those prepared with FC14, FC16, and LFC12. Significantly, all the nAChR-DCs lacked ethanolamine and anionic phospholipids, contained only four cholesterol molecules, and a limited number of phospholipid molecular species per nAChR. Upon incorporation into oocytes, FC12 produce significant functionality, whereas LFC14 and LFC16 nAChR-DCs displayed an increased functionality as compared to the crude Tc membrane. All three nAChR-DCs displayed different degrees of alterations in macroscopic activation and desensitization kinetics.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27641515 PMCID: PMC5027579 DOI: 10.1038/srep32766
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The effectiveness of Folch and D & B methods extracting lipids from Tc electric organ.
Weight data represent the percent of lipid extracted from dry tissue. The percent of lipids from the Tc tissue was calculated using the values of mg of lipid/g dry mass of the tissue. (a) The percent of lipid recovery from the Tc electric organ were 15.79% and 20.14% for the Folch and B&D methods respectively. The data represent the mean ± SEM of six (6) independent extractions for each method compared using an unpaired t-test in Graph Pad Prism 6 (P < 0.0001). (b) The average weight percent of lipid extracted by the Folch and B&D after acidic hydrolysis were 15.79% and 19.86% respectively (P < 0.0001). The average weight percent of lipids for similar samples after base catalyzed hydrolysis were 11.52% and 13.13% respectively (P = 0.1182). The data represent the mean ± SEM of four (4) independent extractions for each experimental conditions using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test.
Figure 2The effectiveness of the Folch and B&D methods extracting phospholipids and cholesterol from Tc electric organ.
Comparison of phospholipid (a) and cholesterol (b) extraction from Tc electric organ using the Folch and B&D extraction methods under acidic and basic conditions. Total nanomoles of phospholipids and cholesterol recovered were expressed as mean ± SEM of four (4) independent extractions under acid or base catalyzed hydrolysis conditions and compared using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test.
Total percent of fatty acids from acid and base catalyzed hydrolysis for both B&D and Foch lipid extraction methods.
| Fatty Acid | MW Exact mass | Acid-Catalyzed Hydrolysis | Base-Catalyzed Hydrolysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bligh & Dyer | Folch | Bligh & Dyer | Folch | ||
| 14:0 | 242.2246 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.1 |
| 16:0 | 270.2558 | 25.1 ± 2.7 | 25.0 ± 1.9 | 26.1 ± 0.9 | 20.2 ± 0.4 |
| 16:1 | 268.2402 | 5.8 ± 1.0 | 5.8 ± 0.5 | 7.5 ± 0.4 | 7.9 ± 0.1 |
| 18:0 | 298.2871 | 14.7 ± 3.2 | 16.6 ± 2.4 | 4.4 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.1 |
| 18:1 | 296.2715 | 16.8 ± 2.1 | 17.4 ± 0.6 | 17.5 ± 0.2 | 21.0 ± 0.5 |
| 18:2 | 294.2559 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.1 |
| 20:3 | 320.2715 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| 20:4 | 318.2559 | 5.0 ± 0.1 | 4.7 ± 0.3 | 6.0 ± 0.1 | 7.8 ± 0.4 |
| 20:5 | 316.2402 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 3.3 ± 0.1 |
| 22:1 | 352.2421 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
| 22:5 | 344.2715 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 2.8 ± 0.1 |
| 22:6 | 342.2559 | 21.0 ± 0.6 | 19.9 ± 2.3 | 25.6 ± 0.6 | 25.5 ± 0.2 |
| 24:1 | 380.2540 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.1 |
Data are the means and ± SEM of three (3) independent experiments performed in triplicate on separate days and compared using an unpaired t-test in Graph Pad Prism 6. The information in this table is a combined data from GC-MS and GCFID of Tc electric organ crude membranes.
Cross-correlation of major lipid species present in six nAChR-DCs from Tc electric organ solubilized with FC and LFC detergent family.
| m/z (M+H)+ | Molecular Species | DC Displaying Significant Functionality | DC’s Displaying High Functionality | DC’s Displaying Low Functionality | R* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC12 | LFC14 | LFC16 | LFC12 | FC 14 | FC 16 | |||
| 760.5825 | PC 16:0/18:1 | X | X | X | X | X | X | >3% |
| 806.5697 | PC 16:0/22:6 | X | X | X | X | X | X | >3% |
| 718.5746 | PC(O-16:0:/16:1) | X | X | X | X | X | X | >3% |
| 746.6097 | PC(O-16:1/18:0) | X | X | X | X | X | X | ~1% |
| 746.6097 | PC(O-18:0/16:1) | X | X | X | X | X | X | ~1% |
| 813.6835 | SM d18:1/24:1 | X | X | X | X | X | X | >3% |
| 704.5217 | PC 14:0/16:1 | X | >3% | |||||
| 730.5325 | PC 14:0/18:2 | X | >3% | |||||
| 808.5896 | PC 16:0/22:5 | X | >3% | |||||
| 810.5925 | PC 18:0/20:4 | X | X | X | <1% | |||
| 828.5564 | PC 20:4/20:5 | X | X | X | <1% | |||
| 828.5564 | PC 20:5/20:4 | X | X | X | <1% | |||
| 785.6594 | SM d18:1/22:1 | X | <1% | |||||
| 496.3445 | LPC 16:0 | X | X | X | <1% | |||
| 468.3097 | LPC 14:0 | X | <1% | |||||
| 440.2803 | LPC 12:0 | X | <1% | |||||
The phospholipid composition of affinity purified nAChR detergent complexes was separated using HILIC column and analyzed by ESI-MS/MS.
R* Relative abundance in MS of crude membrane preparation. <1% indicates components found at trace levels, ~1% minor components and >3% major ones.
Figure 3Effect of detergent in the amount of phospholipids, cholesterol and nAChR present in the detergent complex.
Affinity purified nAChR detergent complex from the Foscholine (nAChR-FC12, LFC14 and nAChR-LFC16) families were analyzed as mentioned in methods section for; (a) phospholipid to nAChR ratio, (b) phospholipid to cholesterol ratio, (c) Cholesterol to nAChR ratio and (d) SDS-PAGE of Tc crude membranes and nAChR detergent complex for the FC and LFC family. The data represent the mean ± SEM of four (4) independent extractions for each experimental conditions using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Comparison to FC12 in (a) ****P < 0.0001, *P < 0.05. In (b) ***P < 0.0003, **P < 0.01. In (c) *P < 0.0182.
Acetylcholine-evoked responses in oocytes injected with detergent-solubilized affinity purified nAChR detergent complexes.
| Mean Current Amplitude (nA) | Normalized Current | Rise Time 10–90% (s) | Decay Time 90–10% (s) | Number (n) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude | −275 ± 24 | 1.00 ± 0.09 | 1.2 ± 0.22 | 6.3 ± 0.50 | 25 |
| FC-12 | −217 ± 22 | 0.79 ± 0.08 | 3.81 ± 0.30*** | 6.0 ± 1.00 | 16 |
| FC-14 | −77 ± 18*** | 0.28 ± 0.07*** | 3.92 ± 0.38 | 3.3 ± 0.13*** | 7 |
| FC-16 | −28 ± 7*** | 0.08 ± 0.03*** | ND | ND | 17 |
| LFC-12 | −25 ± 8*** | 0.10 ± 0.02*** | ND | ND | 9 |
| LFC-14 | −420 ± 45** | 1.53 ± 0.16** | 3.29 ± 0.42 | 4.5 ± 1.50 | 9 |
| LFC-16 | −344 ± 25 | 1.25 ± 0.09 | 2.54 ± 0.74 | 6.5 ± 3.50 | 9 |
Responses were evoked by a 5-second application of 100 μM ACh. The following detergents were used FC-12, FC-14, FC-16, LFC-12, LFC-14, and LFC-16. The amplitude of the responses was compared based on their mean amplitude and then normalized to the response of the respective crude membranes used for solubilization. The kinetics of activation and deactivation of the responses were calculated using a 10–90% rise time and a 90-10% decay time and compared. Data is presented as mean ± SEM and compared using an unpaired t-test; ***P ≤ 0.0001; **P ≤ 0.001.