Literature DB >> 27641309

Comparative effectiveness of adalimumab and etanercept for rheumatoid arthritis in the Brazilian Public Health System.

Jéssica Barreto Ribeiro Dos Santos1, Alessandra Maciel Almeida2, Francisco de Assis Acurcio2, Haliton Alves de Oliveira Junior1, Adriana Maria Kakehasi3, Augusto Afonso Guerra Junior2, Marion Bennie4, Brian Godman4,5, Juliana Alvares2.   

Abstract

AIM: Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with adalimumab and etanercept the most used bDMARDs in Brazil. This open prospective cohort study evaluated their effectiveness and safety among RA patients in the Brazilian Public Health System given their costs.
METHODS: The Clinical Disease Activity Index was primarily used to assess their effectiveness after 6 and 12 months of follow-up. The Health Assessment Questionnaire and EuroQol-5D were also used.
RESULTS: A total of 266 RA patients started treatment with adalimumab or etanercept. Adalimumab was the most widely used bDMARD (70%). In total, 46% achieved remission or low-disease activity at 12 months with no difference in effectiveness between them (p = 0.306). bDMARDs were more effective in patients who had better functionality at treatment onset and had spent longer in education.
CONCLUSION: This real-world study demonstrated that adalimumab and etanercept are equal alternatives for RA treatment and both were well tolerated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brazil; adalimumab; cohort study; effectiveness; etanercept; rheumatoid arthritis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27641309      PMCID: PMC5097454          DOI: 10.2217/cer-2016-0027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Eff Res        ISSN: 2042-6305            Impact factor:   1.744


  43 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: 2002 Update.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-02

Review 2.  The comparative efficacy and safety of biologics for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Gerald Gartlehner; Richard A Hansen; Beth L Jonas; Patricia Thieda; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Treatment response to a second or third TNF-inhibitor in RA: results from the South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group Register.

Authors:  J A Karlsson; L E Kristensen; M C Kapetanovic; A Gülfe; T Saxne; P Geborek
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 4.  Review: treat to target in rheumatoid arthritis: fact, fiction, or hypothesis?

Authors:  Daniel H Solomon; Asaf Bitton; Jeffrey N Katz; Helga Radner; Erika M Brown; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 10.995

5.  Development of antidrug antibodies against adalimumab and association with disease activity and treatment failure during long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Geertje M Bartelds; Charlotte L M Krieckaert; Michael T Nurmohamed; Pauline A van Schouwenburg; Willem F Lems; Jos W R Twisk; Ben A C Dijkmans; Lucien Aarden; Gerrit Jan Wolbink
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A dose-response meta-analysis for quantifying relative efficacy of biologics in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J W Mandema; D H Salinger; S W Baumgartner; M A Gibbs
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Predictors of response to anti-TNF-alpha therapy among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register.

Authors:  K L Hyrich; K D Watson; A J Silman; D P M Symmons
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 8.  Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of disease-modifying medications for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Katrina E Donahue; Gerald Gartlehner; Daniel E Jonas; Linda J Lux; Patricia Thieda; Beth L Jonas; Richard A Hansen; Laura C Morgan; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Comparing Effects of Biologic Agents in Treating Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Multiple Treatment Comparison Regression Analysis.

Authors:  Ingunn Fride Tvete; Bent Natvig; Jørund Gåsemyr; Nils Meland; Marianne Røine; Marianne Klemp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Clinical efficacy of abatacept, tocilizumab, and etanercept in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Shinya Hirabara; Nobunori Takahashi; Naoki Fukaya; Hiroyuki Miyake; Yuichiro Yabe; Atsushi Kaneko; Takayasu Ito; Takeshi Oguchi; Daihei Kida; Yuji Hirano; Takayoshi Fujibayashi; Fumiaki Sugiura; Masatoshi Hayashi; Koji Funahashi; Masahiro Hanabayashi; Shuji Asai; Naoki Ishiguro; Toshihisa Kojima
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 2.980

View more
  2 in total

1.  Funding and Service Organization to Achieve Universal Health Coverage for Medicines: An Economic Evaluation of the Best Investment and Service Organization for the Brazilian Scenario.

Authors:  Marina Morgado Garcia; Pamela Santos Azevedo; Andrew Mirelman; Leandro Pinheiro Safatle; Roberto Iunes; Marion Clark Bennie; Brian Godman; Augusto Afonso Guerra Junior
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  Medication persistence for psoriatic arthritis in a Brazilian real-world setting.

Authors:  Michael Ruberson Ribeiro da Silva; Jéssica Barreto Ribeiro Dos Santos; Alessandra Maciel Almeida; Alexander Itria; Adriana Maria Kakehasi; Juliana Alvares Teodoro; Francisco de Assis Acurcio
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2019-01-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.