Literature DB >> 27640004

Refractive Errors and Amblyopia in the UCLA Preschool Vision Program; First Year Results.

Karen Hendler1, Shiva Mehravaran1, Xiang Lu2, Stuart I Brown3, Bartly J Mondino1, Anne L Coleman4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of full ophthalmic examination for preschool children in LA County who failed screening with the Retinomax Autorefractor.
DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Between August 2012 and May 2013, the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) preschool vision program screened 11 260 preschool children aged 3-5 years in Los Angeles County using the Retinomax Autorefractor only. Of those, 1007 children who failed the screening were examined by an ophthalmologist on the UCLA Mobile Eye Clinic. Data from the eye examination were recorded for all children. Amblyopia was defined as unilateral if there was ≥2 line interocular difference in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and as bilateral if BCVA was <20/50 for children <4 years old and <20/40 for children ≥4 years old.
RESULTS: Glasses were prescribed for 740 (74%) of those examined. Uncorrected visual acuity for all examined children was 0.4 ± 0.2 (logMAR mean ± SD), and BCVA was 0.2 ± 0.1. Of the 88% who underwent cycloplegia, 58% had hyperopia (spherical equivalent [SE] ≥+0.50 diopter [D]), mean of +2.50 D, and 21% had myopia (SE ≤-0.50 D), mean of -1.40 D. A total of 69% had astigmatism ≥1.50 D, mean of 1.97 D (range 0-5.75). Spherical and cylindrical anisometropia ≥1.00 D were each found in 26% of those examined. Refractive amblyopia was found in 9% of those examined, or 0.8% of the original population. Of the amblyopic subjects, 77% were unilateral.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening of preschoolers with the Retinomax led to diagnosis and early treatment of uncorrected refractive errors and amblyopia. By treating children early, amblyopia may be prevented, quality of life improved, and academic achievements enhanced.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27640004     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  10 in total

1.  Prevalence of visual impairment and refractive errors in an urban area of Mexico.

Authors:  Isabel Signes-Soler; David P Piñero; Milagro Inés Murillo; Silvia Tablada
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  The prevalence and causes of pediatric uncorrected refractive error: Pooled data from population studies for Global Burden of Disease (GBD) sub-regions.

Authors:  He Cao; Xiang Cao; Zhi Cao; Lu Zhang; Yue Han; Changchun Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  The Global Prevalence of Amblyopia in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Budan Hu; Zongshun Liu; Jiao Zhao; Li Zeng; Gengsheng Hao; Dan Shui; Ke Mao
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 4.  Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Akbar Fotouhi; Abbasali Yekta; Reza Pakzad; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-27

5.  Evaluation of visual function in preschool-age children using a vision screening protocol.

Authors:  Tsukasa Satou; Yoshiaki Takahashi; Misae Ito; Hiroshi Mochizuki; Takahiro Niida
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-19

Review 6.  Scope and costs of autorefraction and photoscreening for childhood amblyopia-a systematic narrative review in relation to the EUSCREEN project data.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Helen J Griffiths; Jill Carlton; Paolo Mazzone; Arinder Channa; Mandy Nordmann; Huibert J Simonsz
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Rates of spectacle wear in early childhood in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Vasanthi Iyer; Clair A Enthoven; Sijmen A Reijneveld; Caroline C W Klaver; Paula van Dommelen; Ashwin van Samkar; Johanna H Groenewoud; Vincent V W Jaddoe
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.567

Review 8.  Refractive error in underserved adults: causes and potential solutions.

Authors:  V Swetha E Jeganathan; Alan L Robin; Maria A Woodward
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  Refraction and Ocular Biometry of Preschool Children in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Luoli Zhang; Xiangui He; Xiaomei Qu; Xiaofang You; Bingjie Wang; Huijing Shi; Hui Tan; Haidong Zou; Jianfeng Zhu
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Estimating need and coverage for five priority assistive products: a systematic review of global population-based research.

Authors:  Jamie Danemayer; Dorothy Boggs; Vinicius Delgado Ramos; Emma Smith; Ariana Kular; William Bhot; Felipe Ramos-Barajas; Sarah Polack; Cathy Holloway
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.