Literature DB >> 27639606

Glycemic control and maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes according to the type of basal insulin.

A Chico1, L Herranz2, R Corcoy3, O Ramírez4, M M Goya5, J Bellart6, S González-Romero7, M Codina8, P Sánchez9, A Cortázar10, D Acosta11, M J Picón12, J A Rubio13, A Megía14, M A Sancho15, M Balsells16, E Solá17, N L González18, J López-López19.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the potential role of the type of basal insulin on glycemic control and maternal and foetal outcomes in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of pregnancies attended at 18 Spanish tertiary hospitals. INCLUSION CRITERIA: T1DM, singleton pregnancies, delivery between 2002-2010, and use of the same basal and prandial insulin from before pregnancy until delivery.
RESULTS: A total of 1534 pregnancies were included. The basal insulin most commonly used was Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) (51.7%), followed by glargine (23.2%) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) (21.1%). CSII users had longer diabetes duration. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that CSII was independently associated with lower doses of insulin, higher glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in all trimesters, and higher rates of miscarriage, preterm birth and neonatal hypoglycemia. Glargine was related to a higher risk of preterm birth and a small-for-gestational age infant (SGA). The odds ratios (OR) of the associations between insulin type and clinical outcomes (from 0.642 to 4.894) have a relevant magnitude.
CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study of pregnant women with T1DM, the type of basal insulin was independently associated with metabolic variables and foetal outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; Glycated haemoglobin; Insulin analogue; Perinatal outcomes; Pregnancy; Type 1 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27639606     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  3 in total

1.  Is It Safe to Use "On-Demand" Continuous Glucose Monitoring During Pregnancy?

Authors:  Sarit Polsky
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 2.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes with the use of long acting, compared to intermediate acting basal insulin (NPH) for managing diabetes during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jijiao Wang; Xiaochen Ji; Ting Liu; Nan Zhao
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 5.395

3.  Pregnancy outcomes in women with onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus less than 18 years of age.

Authors:  Roy Gavin Stone; Paul Scully; Emma Troy; Yvonne Moloney; Anne Quinn; Eoin Noctor; Orla Neylon; John Slevin; Annemarie Murphy; Clodagh O'Gorman
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.