Literature DB >> 27639477

Mapping the ecosystem service delivery chain: Capacity, flow, and demand pertaining to aesthetic experiences in mountain landscapes.

Lukas Egarter Vigl1, Daniel Depellegrin2, Paulo Pereira2, Rudolf de Groot3, Ulrike Tappeiner4.   

Abstract

Accounting for the spatial connectivity between the provision of ecosystem services (ES) and their beneficiaries (supply-benefit chain) is fundamental to understanding ecosystem functioning and its management. However, the interrelationships of the specific chain links within ecosystems and the actual benefits that flow from natural landscapes to surrounding land have rarely been analyzed. We present a spatially explicit model for the analysis of one cultural ecosystem service (aesthetic experience), which integrates the complete ecosystem service delivery chain for Puez-Geisler Nature Park (Italy): (1) The potential service stock (ES capacity) relies on an expert-based land use ranking matrix, (2) the actual supply (ES flow) is based on visibility properties of observation points along recreational routes, (3) the beneficiaries of the service (ES demand) are derived from socioeconomic data as a measure of the visitation rate to the recreation location, and (4) the supply-demand relationship (ES budget) addresses the spatially explicit oversupply and undersupply of ES. The results indicate that potential ES stocks are substantially higher in core and buffer zones of protected areas than in surrounding land owing to the specific landscape composition. ES flow maps reveal service delivery to 80% of the total area studied, with the highest actual service supply to locations with long and open vistas. ES beneficiary analyses show the highest demand for aesthetic experiences in all-season tourist destinations like Val Badia and Val Gardena, where both recreational amenity and overnight stays are equally high. ES budget maps identify ES hot and cold spots in terms of ES delivery, and they highlight ES undersupply in nature protection buffer zones although they are characterized by highest ES capacity. We show how decision/policy makers can use the presented methodology to plan landscape protection measures and develop specific regulation strategies for visitors based on the ES delivery chain concept.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aesthetic values; Alpine landscapes; Ecosystem service budgeting; Ecosystem services delivery chain; Protected areas; Viewshed model

Year:  2016        PMID: 27639477     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation for landscape aesthetic value of the Natural World Heritage Site.

Authors:  Shangchen Ha; Zhaoping Yang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Evaluation of Potential for Nature-Based Recreation in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: A Spatial-Temporal Perspective.

Authors:  Yayan Lu; Fang Han; Qun Liu; Zhaoguo Wang; Tian Wang; Zhaoping Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Monitoring the effects of land cover change on the supply of ecosystem services in an urban region: A study of Santiago-Valparaíso, Chile.

Authors:  Claudia Montoya-Tangarife; Francisco de la Barrera; Alejandro Salazar; Luis Inostroza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Scenario analysis of ecosystem service changes and interactions in a mountain-oasis-desert system: a case study in Altay Prefecture, China.

Authors:  Qi Fu; Ying Hou; Bo Wang; Xu Bi; Bo Li; Xinshi Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.