Literature DB >> 27639468

Quantity of flowback and produced waters from unconventional oil and gas exploration.

Andrew J Kondash1, Elizabeth Albright1, Avner Vengosh2.   

Abstract

The management and disposal of flowback and produced waters (FP water) is one of the greatest challenges associated with unconventional oil and gas development. The development and production of unconventional natural gas and oil is projected to increase in the coming years, and a better understanding of the volume and quality of FP water is crucial for the safe management of the associated wastewater. We analyzed production data using multiple statistical methods to estimate the total FP water generated per well from six of the major unconventional oil and gas formations in the United States. The estimated median volume ranges from 1.7 to 14.3millionL (0.5 to 3.8milliongal) of FP per well over the first 5-10years of production. Using temporal volume production and water quality data, we show a rapid increase of the salinity associated with a decrease of FP production rates during the first months of unconventional oil and gas production. Based on mass-balance calculations, we estimate that only 4-8% of FP water is composed of returned hydraulic fracturing fluids, while the remaining 92-96% of FP water is derived from naturally occurring formation brines that is extracted together with oil and gas. The salinity and chemical composition of the formation brines are therefore the main limiting factors for beneficial reuse of unconventional oil and gas wastewater.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brines; Flowback fluids; Hydraulic fracturing; Produced water; Shale gas; Tight oil; Unconventional energy; Wastewater

Year:  2016        PMID: 27639468     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  8 in total

1.  Shale gas development and infant health: Evidence from Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Elaine L Hill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  The intensification of the water footprint of hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Andrew J Kondash; Nancy E Lauer; Avner Vengosh
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 14.136

3.  Spatial Modeling to Identify Sociodemographic Predictors of Hydraulic Fracturing Wastewater Injection Wells in Ohio Census Block Groups.

Authors:  Genevieve S Silva; Joshua L Warren; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Where Does Fracking Wastewater Go? Socioeconomic Predictors of Class II Well Placement in Ohio.

Authors:  Lindsey Konkel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Hydraulic fracturing flowback chemical composition diversity as a factor determining possibilities of its management.

Authors:  Joanna Fajfer; Olga Lipińska; Monika Konieczyńska
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Assessing Exposure to Unconventional Oil and Gas Development: Strengths, Challenges, and Implications for Epidemiologic Research.

Authors:  Nicole C Deziel; Cassandra J Clark; Joan A Casey; Michelle L Bell; Desiree L Plata; James E Saiers
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2022-05-06

7.  Unconventional Oil and Gas Development Exposure and Risk of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Case-Control Study in Pennsylvania, 2009-2017.

Authors:  Cassandra J Clark; Nicholaus P Johnson; Mario Soriano; Joshua L Warren; Keli M Sorrentino; Nina S Kadan-Lottick; James E Saiers; Xiaomei Ma; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 11.035

8.  Surface Oxidation of Ethylenechlorotrifluoroethylene (ECTFE) Membrane for the Treatment of Real Produced Water by Membrane Distillation.

Authors:  Zahra Anari; Arijit Sengupta; Sumith Ranil Wickramasinghe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.