Nils Lynen1, Thierry De Vroey2, Imke Spiegel1, Frederik Van Ongeval3, Niels-Jan Hendrickx3, Gaëtane Stassijns4. 1. Praxiszentrum Orthopädie-Unfallchirurgie Nordrhein, Aachen, Germany. 2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. Electronic address: tdevroey@skynet.be. 3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium. 4. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of hyaluronan (HA) injections with standard extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of painful midportion Achilles' tendinopathy. DESIGN: Multinational, prospective, randomized controlled, blinded-observer trial. SETTING: Ambulatory care. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=62) with Achilles' midportion tendinopathy for ≥6 weeks and a pain score of at least 40mm (Huskisson visual analog scale [VAS], 100mm) were randomized, and 59 were analyzed in the intention-to-treat data set. There were no withdrawals because of adverse effects. INTERVENTIONS: Two peritendinous HA injections versus 3 ESWT applications at weekly intervals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary efficacy criterion was changed from the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles' questionnaire (VISA-A) score to the percent change in pain (VAS) at 3 months posttreatment, compared with baseline values. Main secondary parameters were VISA-A, Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and clinical parameters. RESULTS: HA treatment provided a clinically relevant improvement in Achilles' midportion tendinopathy. A large superiority of the HA group, compared with ESWT application, was observed for percent change in pain (VAS), and this superiority was proven to be statistically significant (Mann-Whitney statistic [MW]=.7507 with P=.0030 lower than required α=.025 significance level 1-sided; Mann-Whitney U test) at 3 months posttreatment. Similar findings for HA were also observed at 4 weeks (MW=.6425, P=.0304) and 6 months (MW=.7172, P=.0018). Advantage of HA treatment was confirmed by VISA-A questionnaire, CGI, and clinical parameters. Ten adverse events, 4 in the HA group and 6 in the ESWT group, were reported, but none were classified as serious. CONCLUSIONS: Two peritendinous HA injections showed greater treatment success in Achilles' midportion tendinopathy compared with standard ESWT.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of hyaluronan (HA) injections with standard extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of painful midportion Achilles' tendinopathy. DESIGN: Multinational, prospective, randomized controlled, blinded-observer trial. SETTING: Ambulatory care. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (N=62) with Achilles' midportion tendinopathy for ≥6 weeks and a pain score of at least 40mm (Huskisson visual analog scale [VAS], 100mm) were randomized, and 59 were analyzed in the intention-to-treat data set. There were no withdrawals because of adverse effects. INTERVENTIONS: Two peritendinous HA injections versus 3 ESWT applications at weekly intervals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary efficacy criterion was changed from the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles' questionnaire (VISA-A) score to the percent change in pain (VAS) at 3 months posttreatment, compared with baseline values. Main secondary parameters were VISA-A, Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and clinical parameters. RESULTS:HA treatment provided a clinically relevant improvement in Achilles' midportion tendinopathy. A large superiority of the HA group, compared with ESWT application, was observed for percent change in pain (VAS), and this superiority was proven to be statistically significant (Mann-Whitney statistic [MW]=.7507 with P=.0030 lower than required α=.025 significance level 1-sided; Mann-Whitney U test) at 3 months posttreatment. Similar findings for HA were also observed at 4 weeks (MW=.6425, P=.0304) and 6 months (MW=.7172, P=.0018). Advantage of HA treatment was confirmed by VISA-A questionnaire, CGI, and clinical parameters. Ten adverse events, 4 in the HA group and 6 in the ESWT group, were reported, but none were classified as serious. CONCLUSIONS: Two peritendinous HA injections showed greater treatment success in Achilles' midportion tendinopathy compared with standard ESWT.
Authors: Karin Grävare Silbernagel; Peter Malliaras; Robert-Jan de Vos; Shawn Hanlon; Mitchel Molenaar; Håkan Alfredson; Inge van den Akker-Scheek; Jarrod Antflick; Mathijs van Ark; Kenneth Färnqvist; Zubair Haleem; Jean-Francois Kaux; Paul Kirwan; Bhavesh Kumar; Trevor Lewis; Adrian Mallows; Lorenzo Masci; Dylan Morrissey; Myles Murphy; Richard Newsham-West; Richard Norris; Seth O'Neill; Koen Peers; Igor Sancho; Kayla Seymore; Patrick Vallance; Arco van der Vlist; Bill Vicenzino Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-11-19 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Arco C van der Vlist; Marinus Winters; Adam Weir; Clare L Ardern; Nicky J Welton; Deborah M Caldwell; Jan A N Verhaar; Robert-Jan de Vos Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Magdalena Stania; Grzegorz Juras; Daria Chmielewska; Anna Polak; Cezary Kucio; Piotr Król Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2019-12-26 Impact factor: 3.411