Thies Lüdtke1, Levente Kriston2, Johanna Schröder3, Tania M Lincoln4, Steffen Moritz3. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: t.luedtke@uke.de. 2. Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 4. Institute of Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Negative affect and a tendency to "jump to conclusions" (JTC) are associated with paranoia. So far, only negative affect has been examined as a precursor of subsequent paranoia in daily life using experience sampling (ESM). We addressed this research gap and used ESM to test whether JTC fluctuates in daily life, whether it predicts subsequent paranoia, and whether it mediates the effect of negative affect on paranoia. METHODS: Thirty-five participants with schizophrenia spectrum disorders repeatedly self-reported negative affect, JTC, and paranoia via online questionnaires on two consecutive days. We measured JTC with a paradigm consisting of ambiguous written scenarios. Multilevel linear models were conducted. RESULTS: Most participants showed JTC consistently on two days rather than only on one day. When time was used as a predictor of JTC, significant slope variance indicated that for a subgroup of participants JTC fluctuated over time. For 48% of participants, these fluctuations equaled changes of approximately ±1 point on the four-point JTC scale within one day. There was no mediation. However, negative affect and JTC both significantly predicted subsequent paranoia. LIMITATIONS: The ESM assessment period was short and encompassed few assessments (8 in total). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that JTC is both stable (regarding its mere occurrence) and fluctuating simultaneously (regarding its magnitude). Although JTC was not a mediator linking negative affect and paranoia, it did predict paranoia. Further ESM studies on JTC are needed to confirm our findings in longer assessment periods and with other JTC paradigms.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Negative affect and a tendency to "jump to conclusions" (JTC) are associated with paranoia. So far, only negative affect has been examined as a precursor of subsequent paranoia in daily life using experience sampling (ESM). We addressed this research gap and used ESM to test whether JTC fluctuates in daily life, whether it predicts subsequent paranoia, and whether it mediates the effect of negative affect on paranoia. METHODS: Thirty-five participants with schizophrenia spectrum disorders repeatedly self-reported negative affect, JTC, and paranoia via online questionnaires on two consecutive days. We measured JTC with a paradigm consisting of ambiguous written scenarios. Multilevel linear models were conducted. RESULTS: Most participants showed JTC consistently on two days rather than only on one day. When time was used as a predictor of JTC, significant slope variance indicated that for a subgroup of participants JTC fluctuated over time. For 48% of participants, these fluctuations equaled changes of approximately ±1 point on the four-point JTC scale within one day. There was no mediation. However, negative affect and JTC both significantly predicted subsequent paranoia. LIMITATIONS: The ESM assessment period was short and encompassed few assessments (8 in total). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that JTC is both stable (regarding its mere occurrence) and fluctuating simultaneously (regarding its magnitude). Although JTC was not a mediator linking negative affect and paranoia, it did predict paranoia. Further ESM studies on JTC are needed to confirm our findings in longer assessment periods and with other JTC paradigms.
Authors: Thea Zander-Schellenberg; Sarah A K Kuhn; Julian Möller; Andrea H Meyer; Christian Huber; Roselind Lieb; Christina Andreou Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Katie M Lavigne; Geneviève Sauvé; Delphine Raucher-Chéné; Synthia Guimond; Tania Lecomte; Christopher R Bowie; Mahesh Menon; Shalini Lal; Todd S Woodward; Michael D Bodnar; Martin Lepage Journal: Schizophrenia (Heidelb) Date: 2022-03-05
Authors: Cécile Henquet; Jim van Os; Lotta K Pries; Christian Rauschenberg; Philippe Delespaul; Gunter Kenis; Jurjen J Luykx; Bochao D Lin; Alexander L Richards; Berna Akdede; Tolga Binbay; Vesile Altınyazar; Berna Yalınçetin; Güvem Gümüş-Akay; Burçin Cihan; Haldun Soygür; Halis Ulaş; Eylem S Cankurtaran; Semra U Kaymak; Marina M Mihaljevic; Sanja S Petrovic; Tijana Mirjanic; Miguel Bernardo; Gisela Mezquida; Silvia Amoretti; Julio Bobes; Pilar A Saiz; Maria P García-Portilla; Julio Sanjuan; Eduardo J Aguilar; Jose L Santos; Estela Jiménez-López; Manuel Arrojo; Angel Carracedo; Gonzalo López; Javier González-Peñas; Mara Parellada; Nadja P Maric; Cem Atbaşoğlu; Alp Ucok; Köksal Alptekin; Meram C Saka; Celso Arango; Michael O'Donovan; Bart P F Rutten; Sinan Gülöksüz Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 10.592