Salvatore Petta1, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong2,3, Calogero Cammà1, Jean-Baptiste Hiriart4, Grace Lai-Hung Wong2,3, Fabio Marra5, Julien Vergniol4, Anthony Wing-Hung Chan6, Vito Di Marco1, Wassil Merrouche4, Henry Lik-Yuen Chan2,3, Marco Barbara1, Brigitte Le-Bail7,8, Umberto Arena5, Antonio Craxì1, Victor de Ledinghen4,7. 1. Sezione di Gastroenterologia, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy. 2. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 3. State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 4. Centre d'Investigation de la Fibrose hépatique, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France. 5. Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy. 6. Department of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 7. INSERM U1053, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France. 8. Service de Pathologie, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Abstract
Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) frequently overestimates the severity of liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) is a new parameter provided by the same machine used for LSM and associated with both steatosis and body mass index, the two factors mostly affecting LSM performance in NAFLD. We aimed to determine whether prediction of liver fibrosis by LSM in NAFLD patients is affected by CAP values. Patients (n = 324) were assessed by clinical and histological (Kleiner score) features. LSM and CAP were performed using the M probe. CAP values were grouped by tertiles (lower 132-298, middle 299-338, higher 339-400 dB/m). Among patients with F0-F2 fibrosis, mean LSM values, expressed in kilopascals, increased according to CAP tertiles (6.8 versus 8.6 versus 9.4, P = 0.001), and along this line the area under the curve of LSM for the diagnosis of F3-F4 fibrosis was progressively reduced from lower to middle and further to higher CAP tertiles (0.915, 0.848-0.982; 0.830, 0.753-0.908; 0.806, 0.723-0.890). As a consequence, in subjects with F0-F2 fibrosis, the rates of false-positive LSM results for F3-F4 fibrosis increased according to CAP tertiles (7.2% in lower versus 16.6% in middle versus 18.1% in higher). Consistent with this, a decisional flowchart for predicting fibrosis was suggested by combining both LSM and CAP values. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NAFLD, CAP values should always be taken into account in order to avoid overestimations of liver fibrosis assessed by transient elastography. (Hepatology 2017;65:1145-1155).
Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) frequently overestimates the severity of liver fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) is a new parameter provided by the same machine used for LSM and associated with both steatosis and body mass index, the two factors mostly affecting LSM performance in NAFLD. We aimed to determine whether prediction of liver fibrosis by LSM in NAFLD patients is affected by CAP values. Patients (n = 324) were assessed by clinical and histological (Kleiner score) features. LSM and CAP were performed using the M probe. CAP values were grouped by tertiles (lower 132-298, middle 299-338, higher 339-400 dB/m). Among patients with F0-F2 fibrosis, mean LSM values, expressed in kilopascals, increased according to CAP tertiles (6.8 versus 8.6 versus 9.4, P = 0.001), and along this line the area under the curve of LSM for the diagnosis of F3-F4 fibrosis was progressively reduced from lower to middle and further to higher CAP tertiles (0.915, 0.848-0.982; 0.830, 0.753-0.908; 0.806, 0.723-0.890). As a consequence, in subjects with F0-F2 fibrosis, the rates of false-positive LSM results for F3-F4 fibrosis increased according to CAP tertiles (7.2% in lower versus 16.6% in middle versus 18.1% in higher). Consistent with this, a decisional flowchart for predicting fibrosis was suggested by combining both LSM and CAP values. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NAFLD, CAP values should always be taken into account in order to avoid overestimations of liver fibrosis assessed by transient elastography. (Hepatology 2017;65:1145-1155).
Authors: Jonathan Chung-Fai Leung; Thomson Chi-Wang Loong; James Pang; Jeremy Lok Wei; Vincent Wai-Sun Wong Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 6.047
Authors: Hye Won Lee; Beom Kyung Kim; Seung Up Kim; Jun Yong Park; Do Young Kim; Sang Hoon Ahn; Kwang Joon Kim; Kwang-Hyub Han Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Max M Puthenpura; Vishal Patel; John Fam; Leon Katz; David S Tichansky; Stephan Myers Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-09-26 Impact factor: 4.129