Literature DB >> 27639071

Noninvasive tools and risk of clinically significant portal hypertension and varices in compensated cirrhosis: The "Anticipate" study.

Juan G Abraldes1, Christophe Bureau2, Horia Stefanescu3, Salvador Augustin4, Michael Ney1, Hélène Blasco2, Bogdan Procopet3,5, Jaime Bosch5,6, Joan Genesca4, Annalisa Berzigotti5,6.   

Abstract

In patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD), the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and varices needing treatment (VNT) bears prognostic and therapeutic implications. Our aim was to develop noninvasive tests-based risk prediction models to provide a point-of-care risk assessment of cACLD patients. We analyzed 518 patients with cACLD from five centers in Europe/Canada with paired noninvasive tests (liver stiffness measurement [LSM] by transient elastography, platelet count, and spleen diameter with calculation of liver stiffness to spleen/platelet score [LSPS] score and platelet-spleen ratio [PSR]) and endoscopy/hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement. Risk of CSPH, varices, and VNT was modeled with logistic regression. All noninvasive tests reliably identified patients with high risk of CSPH, and LSPS had the highest discrimination. LSPS values above 2.65 were associated with risks of CSPH above 80%. None of the tests identified patients with very low risk of all-size varices, but both LSPS and a model combining TE and platelet count identified patients with very low risk (<5%) risk of VNT, suggesting that they could be used to triage patients requiring screening endoscopy. LSPS values of <1.33 were associated with a <5% risk of VNT, and 26% of patients had values below this threshold. LSM combined with platelet count predicted a risk <5% of VNT in 30% of the patients. Nomograms were developed to facilitate point-of-care risk assessment.
CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients with a very high risk of CSPH, and a population with a very low risk of VNT can be identified with simple, noninvasive tests, suggesting that these can be used to individualize medical care. (Hepatology 2016;64:2173-2184).
© 2016 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27639071     DOI: 10.1002/hep.28824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  53 in total

1.  Role of Liver Stiffness Measurement in Predicting HCC Occurrence in Direct-Acting Antivirals Setting: A Real-Life Experience.

Authors:  Luca Rinaldi; Maria Guarino; Alessandro Perrella; Pia Clara Pafundi; Giovanna Valente; Luca Fontanella; Riccardo Nevola; Barbara Guerrera; Natalina Iuliano; Michele Imparato; Alessio Trabucco; Ferdinando Carlo Sasso; Filomena Morisco; Antonio Ascione; Guido Piai; Luigi Elio Adinolfi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Platelet count, spleen length, and platelet count-to-spleen length ratio for the diagnosis of oesophageal varices in people with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Agostino Colli; Juan Cristóbal Gana; Jason Yap; Thomasin Adams-Webber; Natalie Rashkovan; Simon C Ling; Giovanni Casazza
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-26

Review 3.  Noninvasive imaging assessment of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Octavia Bane; Stefanie J Hectors; Aaron Fischman; Thomas Schiano; Sara Lewis; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-14

4.  Baveno VI Recommendation on Avoidance of Screening Endoscopy in Cirrhotic Patients: Not Quite There Yet!

Authors:  Susana Rodrigues
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-09

Review 5.  Remaining challenges for the noninvasive diagnosis of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Tetsuo Takehara; Ryotaro Sakamori
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.230

6.  Validating, deconstructing and refining Baveno criteria for ruling out high-risk varices in patients with compensated cirrhosis.

Authors:  Parastoo Jangouk; Laura Turco; Ana De Oliveira; Filippo Schepis; Erica Villa; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.828

7.  Role of Spleen Stiffness Measurement by 2D-Shear Wave Elastography in Ruling Out the Presence of High-Risk Varices in Cirrhotic Patients.

Authors:  Dimitrios S Karagiannakis; Theodoros Voulgaris; Evgenia Koureta; Elissavet Chloupi; George V Papatheodoridis; John Vlachogiannakos
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Screening and Surveillance of Varices in Patients With Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Sofia Simona Jakab; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 9.  Clinical Assessment and Management of Portal Hypertension.

Authors:  Jacob Kibrit; Ruben Khan; Barbara H Jung; Sean Koppe
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 1.513

10.  [Splenic thickness combined with routine clinical markers predicts esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis].

Authors:  Ge-Yang Dai; Zhi Liu; Fan Zeng; Dan Zhou; Lin Dai
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.