Literature DB >> 27639052

The costs of 'free': Experiences of facility-based childbirth after Benin's caesarean section exemption policy.

Isabelle L Lange1, Lydie Kanhonou2, Sourou Goufodji2, Carine Ronsmans3, Véronique Filippi3.   

Abstract

As one of many similar policies in the region, in 2009 Benin launched a free c-section policy in publicly funded hospitals intended to decrease the barriers to facility delivery and the heavy financial burdens on women and their families. We conducted a qualitative study for eight months between 2012 and 2014 to understand women's experiences of care in maternity wards. We carried out semi-structured interviews with 30 women who had delivered via c-section at five hospitals. Two of these hospitals became case study sites where in-depth research was undertaken that consisted of participant observation in each maternity ward and 32 further interviews with women who had complicated, vaginal and c-section deliveries. Overall, women continue to pay for care, both in the form of under-the-table payments to health workers and prescribed payments for services not covered by the policy, though they consider the costs reasonable compared to what the charges were before. Lifting the fees has facilitated conditions for midwives to alert doctors that the procedure might be needed. Partly because c-sections are still feared by most women, in one hospital this led to some women perceiving them as a threat if their labour was progressing more slowly. Implementation of the policy differed greatly between the two case study hospitals. We conclude that some burdens on women's access to care have been addressed but deterrents remain to the improved perception of quality of care on the part of women. Findings detail how important context is to the implementation of the policy, and suggest that similar user-fee removal policies should be accompanied by other measures addressing staff management and quality of care.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benin; Caesarean section; Delivery care; Exemption policies; Maternal health; Quality of care; User-fees

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27639052     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  11 in total

1.  Examining the implementation of the Linda Mama free maternity program in Kenya.

Authors:  Stacey Orangi; Angela Kairu; Joanne Ondera; Boniface Mbuthia; Augustina Koduah; Boniface Oyugi; Nirmala Ravishankar; Edwine Barasa
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2021-08-11

2.  The operations of the free maternal care policy and out of pocket payments during childbirth in rural Northern Ghana.

Authors:  Philip Ayizem Dalinjong; Alex Y Wang; Caroline S E Homer
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2017-11-22

3.  'Rowing against the current': the policy process and effects of removing user fees for caesarean sections in Benin.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Dossou; Jenny A Cresswell; Patrick Makoutodé; Vincent De Brouwere; Sophie Witter; Veronique Filippi; Lydie G Kanhonou; Sourou B Goufodji; Isabelle L Lange; Lionel Lawin; Fabien Affo; Bruno Marchal
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-01-29

4.  DECIDE: a cluster-randomized controlled trial to reduce unnecessary caesarean deliveries in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Charles Kaboré; Valéry Ridde; Nils Chaillet; Fadima Yaya Bocoum; Ana Pilar Betrán; Alexandre Dumont
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 5.  Implementation science in maternity care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Ann Dadich; Annika Piper; Dominiek Coates
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 6.  Effects of free maternal policies on quality and cost of care and outcomes: an integrative review.

Authors:  Boniface Oyugi; Sally Kendall; Stephen Peckham
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 1.458

7.  Where and why do we lose women from the continuum of care in maternal health? A mixed-methods study in Southern Benin.

Authors:  Charlotte Gryseels; Jean-Paul Dossou; Armelle Vigan; Christelle Boyi Hounsou; Lydie Kanhonou; Lenka Benova; Thérèse Delvaux
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.918

8.  Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section targeted at organisations, facilities and systems: Systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Carol Kingdon; Soo Downe; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of caesarean section delivery in Ghana: a cross-sectional study using nationally representative data.

Authors:  Emmanuel Dankwah; Shelley Kirychuk; Wu Zeng; Cindy Feng; Marwa Farag
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2019-10-25

10.  Inequalities in prevalence of birth by caesarean section in Ghana from 1998-2014.

Authors:  Joshua Okyere; Henry Ofori Duah; Abdul-Aziz Seidu; Bright Opoku Ahinkorah; Eugene Budu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.