Literature DB >> 27638453

Cost-effectiveness of telemonitoring of diabetic foot ulcer patients.

Iben Fasterholdt1, Marie Gerstrøm2, Benjamin Schnack Brandt Rasmussen, Knud Bonnet Yderstræde3, Kristian Kidholm1, Kjeld Møller Pedersen4.   

Abstract

This study compared the cost-effectiveness of telemonitoring with standard monitoring for patients with diabetic foot ulcers. The economic evaluation was nested within a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. A total of 374 patients were randomised to either telemonitoring or standard monitoring. Telemonitoring consisted of two tele-consultations in the patient's own home and one consultation at the outpatient clinic; standard monitoring consisted of three outpatient clinic consultations. Total healthcare costs were estimated over a 6-month period at individual patient level, from a healthcare sector perspective. The bootstrap method was used to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed. Telemonitoring costs were found to be €2039 less per patient compared to standard monitoring; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Amputation rate was similar in the two groups. In conclusion, a telemonitoring service in this form had similar costs and effects as standard monitoring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost-effectiveness analysis; diabetes; foot ulcers; randomised controlled trial; telemedicine

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27638453     DOI: 10.1177/1460458216663026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Informatics J        ISSN: 1460-4582            Impact factor:   2.681


  7 in total

1.  Costs and Benefits of Telemedicine Compared to Face-to-Face Treatment in Patients with Lower Extremity Ulcers.

Authors:  Alexander Gamus; Gabriel Chodick
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Cost-effectiveness of telemonitoring screening for diabetic foot ulcer: a mathematical model.

Authors:  Chris Boodoo; Julie A Perry; General Leung; Karen M Cross; Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-10-18

Review 3.  Advanced Wound Diagnostics: Toward Transforming Wound Care into Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Maximillian A Weigelt; Hadar A Lev-Tov; Marjana Tomic-Canic; W David Lee; Ryan Williams; David Strasfeld; Robert S Kirsner; Ira M Herman
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Telemedicine in Chronic Wound Management: Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lihong Chen; Lihui Cheng; Wei Gao; Dawei Chen; Chun Wang; Xingwu Ran
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 5.  Telehealth and telemedicine applications for the diabetic foot: A systematic review.

Authors:  Constantijn E V B Hazenberg; Wouter B Aan de Stegge; Sjef G Van Baal; Frans L Moll; Sicco A Bus
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 4.876

6.  Telehealth has comparable outcomes to in-person diabetic foot care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kamaratos-Sevdalis; Alexandros Kamaratos; Marios Papadakis; Christos Tsagkaris
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2022-07-20

7.  Description and Utilization of Telewound Monitoring Services in Primary Care Patients with Acute Wounds in Singapore: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Xiaoli Zhu; Barnabas Felix Soh Jia Ren; Voon Hooi Lim; Lili Wan; Yan Chen; Xiuhong Wang; Jiayi Weng; Ling Jia Goh
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 2.373

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.