Marcelo Haertel Miglioranza1, Luigi Paolo Badano2, Sorina Mihăilă3, Diletta Peluso2, Umberto Cucchini2, Nicola Soriani2, Sabino Iliceto2, Denisa Muraru4. 1. Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; Cardiology Institute of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. 2. Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. 3. Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy; University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila," Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, Romania. 4. Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. Electronic address: denisa.muraru@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) longitudinal strain (LS) using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography has emerged as an important diagnostic and prognostic parameter in various cardiovascular conditions. However, its reference values, their correlations with demographics characteristics, and its physiologic determinants remain to be established. METHODS: Accordingly, 171 healthy volunteers (mean age, 45 ± 12 years; 61% women) in whom LS was obtained from both apical four- and two-chamber dedicated views of the left atrium, considering the P-P interval on the electrocardiogram as the reference cardiac cycle, were prospectively studied. From the LA LS curve we measured the extent of the negative deflection (LSneg), representing LA active contraction, the positive deflection (LSpos) during LA filling, and total LS (LStot), as the sum of LSneg and LSpos values. RESULTS: Average values for biplane LA LSpos, LSneg, and LStot were 19.7%, -14.5%, and 33.3%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, age, left ventricular (LV) global LS and volume, and LV diastolic function were the main physiologic determinants of LA LSpos (R2 = 0.57) and LStot (R2 = 0.40), whereas systolic blood pressure, E/A ratio, global LS, and LV stroke volume were the main determinants of LA LSneg (R2 = 0.20). Women had higher LSpos and LStot than men, particularly before 50 years of age. LA LSpos and LStot decreased with aging, with different trends in men and women. CONCLUSIONS: LA LS values are different in men and women and should be interpreted taking into account patient age and LV function as well. These reference values may help identify subclinical LA dysfunction in several cardiovascular or systemic conditions.
BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) longitudinal strain (LS) using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography has emerged as an important diagnostic and prognostic parameter in various cardiovascular conditions. However, its reference values, their correlations with demographics characteristics, and its physiologic determinants remain to be established. METHODS: Accordingly, 171 healthy volunteers (mean age, 45 ± 12 years; 61% women) in whom LS was obtained from both apical four- and two-chamber dedicated views of the left atrium, considering the P-P interval on the electrocardiogram as the reference cardiac cycle, were prospectively studied. From the LA LS curve we measured the extent of the negative deflection (LSneg), representing LA active contraction, the positive deflection (LSpos) during LA filling, and total LS (LStot), as the sum of LSneg and LSpos values. RESULTS: Average values for biplane LA LSpos, LSneg, and LStot were 19.7%, -14.5%, and 33.3%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, age, left ventricular (LV) global LS and volume, and LV diastolic function were the main physiologic determinants of LA LSpos (R2 = 0.57) and LStot (R2 = 0.40), whereas systolic blood pressure, E/A ratio, global LS, and LV stroke volume were the main determinants of LA LSneg (R2 = 0.20). Women had higher LSpos and LStot than men, particularly before 50 years of age. LA LSpos and LStot decreased with aging, with different trends in men and women. CONCLUSIONS: LA LS values are different in men and women and should be interpreted taking into account patient age and LV function as well. These reference values may help identify subclinical LA dysfunction in several cardiovascular or systemic conditions.
Authors: Angel M Alonso Gómez; Lucas Tojal Sierra; Noris Mora Mora; Estefanía Toledo; Alvaro Alonso; María Garrido Uriarte; Carolina Sorto Sanchez; María P Portillo; Luis López Rodriguez; Elena Escribano Arellano; Helmut Schröder; Jordi Salas-Salvadó Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: P Meimoun; V Stracchi; J Boulanger; S Martis; T Botoro; H Zemir; J Clerc Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Henrique Doria de Vasconcellos; Theingi Tiffany Win; Ela Chamera; Seo Young Hong; Bharath Ambale Venkatesh; Patrick Young; Xiaoying Yang; Luisa Ciuffo; Ravi K Sharma; Masamichi Imai; Mohammadali Habibi; Colin O Wud; Susan R Heckbert; David A Bluemke; Joao A C Lima Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2020-04-09 Impact factor: 3.173