Literature DB >> 27638220

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: outcomes reported by a centre with no previous laparoscopic experience.

Claudio Giberti1, Fabrizio Gallo2, Maurizio Schenone1, Pierluigi Cortese1.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) has proved to be an effective minimally invasive treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). However, its application is still limited by the challenge of the laparoscopic learning curve, which seems to be overcome by the recent introduction of robot assistance. The aim of this manuscript is to show our outcomes after the first robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasties (RP) and critically evaluate the feasibility of this technique when performed by a surgical team without any previous laparoscopic experience. Between March 2005 and July 2008, 16 patients with UPJO underwent transperitoneal RPs. Before and after surgery patients were evaluated by ultrasonography, intravenous urography or retrograde pyelography, computed tomography (CT) scan, and/or diuretic renography. Mean follow-up was 16.8 months. The assessed outcomes were mean operative time (OT), mean estimated blood loss (EBL), mean length of hospital stay (LOS), success (SR), and complication rates (CR). OT, EBL, LOS, and SR were 202 min, 60 ml, 5.2 days, and 94%, respectively. Among the minor complications, two patients (12%) reported moderate abdominal pain while, concerning major complications, one patient (6%) developed ileus. Robot assistance was confirmed as a special tool for laparoscopic treatment of UPJO with excellent outcomes after a shorter learning curve. As shown by our results, the feasibility of RP may also be extended to naïve surgeons who can approach this technique even in the absence of previous laparoscopic training, rapidly attaining results similar to those reported by both laparoscopically experienced and expert robotic surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Pyeloplasty; Robotics; Ureteral obstruction

Year:  2009        PMID: 27638220     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-009-0145-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  22 in total

1.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard.

Authors:  D A Moon; M A El-Shazly; C M Chang; T R Gianduzzo; C G Eden
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Comparison of surgical approaches to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Robert J Stein; Inderbir S Gill; Mihir M Desai
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Jens J Rassweiler; Svetozar Subotic; Michaela Feist-Schwenk; Marto Sugiono; Michael Schulze; Dogu Teber; Thomas Frede
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Erik S Weise; Howard N Winfield
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  H Christoph Klingler; Mesut Remzi; Guenter Janetschek; Christian Kratzik; Michael J Marberger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience.

Authors:  Patrick W Mufarrij; Michael Woods; Ojas D Shah; Michael A Palese; Aaron D Berger; Raju Thomas; Michael D Stifelman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction.

Authors:  J D Brooks; L R Kavoussi; G M Preminger; W W Schuessler; R G Moore
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: technical considerations and outcomes.

Authors:  Brent V Yanke; Costas D Lallas; Christopher Pagnani; Demetrius H Bagley
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a prospective randomized comparison between the transperitoneal approach and retroperitoneoscopy.

Authors:  Ahmed M Shoma; Ahmed R El Nahas; Mahmoud A Bazeed
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; Nilesh N Patil; Geoff Coughlin; Pankaj P Dangle; Kenneth Palmer
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.