Literature DB >> 27637862

Gamma-band activity reflects attentional guidance by facial expression.

Kathrin Müsch1, Markus Siegel2, Andreas K Engel3, Till R Schneider4.   

Abstract

Facial expressions attract attention due to their motivational significance. Previous work focused on attentional biases towards threat-related, fearful faces, although healthy participants tend to avoid mild threat. Growing evidence suggests that neuronal gamma (>30Hz) and alpha-band activity (8-12Hz) play an important role in attentional selection, but it is unknown if such oscillatory activity is involved in the guidance of attention through facial expressions. Thus, in this magnetoencephalography (MEG) study we investigated whether attention is shifted towards or away from fearful faces and characterized the underlying neuronal activity in these frequency ranges in forty-four healthy volunteers. We employed a covert spatial attention task using neutral and fearful faces as task-irrelevant distractors and emotionally neutral Gabor patches as targets. Participants had to indicate the tilt direction of the target. Analysis of the neuronal data was restricted to the responses to target Gabor patches. We performed statistical analysis at the sensor level and used subsequent source reconstruction to localize the observed effects. Spatially selective attention effects in the alpha and gamma band were revealed in parieto-occipital regions. We observed an attentional cost of processing the face distractors, as reflected in lower task performance on targets with short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA <150ms) between faces and targets. On the neuronal level, attentional orienting to face distractors led to enhanced gamma band activity in bilateral occipital and parietal regions, when fearful faces were presented in the same hemifield as targets, but only in short SOA trials. Our findings provide evidence that both top-down and bottom-up attentional biases are reflected in parieto-occipital gamma-band activity.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Emotion; Faces; MEG; Oscillations; Threat bias

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27637862     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  4 in total

1.  Intrinsic frequency biases and profiles across human cortex.

Authors:  Monika S Mellem; Sophie Wohltjen; Stephen J Gotts; Avniel Singh Ghuman; Alex Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Heightened amygdala responsiveness in s-carriers of 5-HTTLPR genetic polymorphism reflects enhanced cortical rather than subcortical inputs: An MEG study.

Authors:  Qian Luo; Tom Holroyd; Derek Mitchell; Henry Yu; Xi Cheng; Colin Hodgkinson; Gang Chen; Daniel McCaffrey; David Goldman; R James Blair
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  High Gamma Band EEG Closely Related to Emotion: Evidence From Functional Network.

Authors:  Kai Yang; Li Tong; Jun Shu; Ning Zhuang; Bin Yan; Ying Zeng
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Influence of Attention Control on Implicit and Explicit Emotion Processing of Face and Body: Evidence From Flanker and Same-or-Different Paradigms.

Authors:  Viola Oldrati; Alessandra Bardoni; Geraldina Poggi; Cosimo Urgesi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.