Literature DB >> 27637682

Training current and future robotic surgeons simultaneously: initial experiences with safety and efficiency.

Ryan M Juza1, Randy S Haluck2, Eugene J Won3, Laura M Enomoto2, Eric M Pauli2, Ann M Rogers2, Vinay Singhal2, Tung Tran2, Stephanie J Estes4, Jerome R Lyn-Sue2.   

Abstract

Robotic surgery is experiencing a rapidly-increasing presence in the field of general surgery. The adoption of any new technology carries the challenge of training current and future surgeons in a safe and effective manner. We report our experience with the initiation of a robotic general surgery program at an academic institution while simultaneously incorporating surgical trainees. The initial procedure performed was robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC). Concurrent with the introduction of a robotic general surgical program, our institution implemented a progressive surgical trainee curriculum for all active residents and fellows. Immediately after being credentialed to perform RAC, attending surgeons began incorporating surgical trainees into robotic procedures. We retrospectively reviewed our first 50 RACs and compared them with our previous 50 standard laparoscopic cholecystectomies (SLC) to determine the impact of rapid integration of surgical trainees on developing technologies. Despite new technology and novice surgeons, there was no difference in mean operative time between the SLC and RAC groups (75.3 vs. 84.1 min, p = 0.077). Two patients in the robotic-assisted group required intraoperative conversion. Hospital length of stay was similar between groups, with the majority of patients leaving the same day. There were no postoperative complications in either group. A robotic general surgery program can be initiated while concurrently instructing surgical trainees on robotic surgery in a safe and efficient manner. We report our initial experience with the adoption of this rapidly advancing technology and describe our training model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Innovation; Progressive; Robotic surgery; Surgical training

Year:  2014        PMID: 27637682     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-014-0455-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  18 in total

1.  Computers and virtual reality for surgical education in the 21st century.

Authors:  R S Haluck; T M Krummel
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-07

2.  Externalities in hospitals and physician adoption of a new surgical technology: an exploratory analysis.

Authors:  J J Escarce
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  The evolution of robotic general surgery.

Authors:  E B Wilson
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.360

4.  Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Corollos Abdelshehid; Stephen Quach; Achim Lusch; Joseph Graversen; Jaime Landman; Elspeth M McDougall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum.

Authors:  Andrew P Stegemann; Kamran Ahmed; Johar R Syed; Shabnam Rehman; Khurshid Ghani; Ricardo Autorino; Mohamed Sharif; Amrith Rao; Yi Shi; Gregory E Wilding; James M Hassett; Ashirwad Chowriappa; Thenkurussi Kesavadas; James O Peabody; Mani Menon; Jihad Kaouk; Khurshid Ahad Guru
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  da Vinci Skills Simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance.

Authors:  Kyle T Finnegan; Anoop M Meraney; Ilene Staff; Steven J Shichman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Intraoperative resident education for robotic laparoscopic gastric banding surgery: a pilot study on the safety of stepwise education.

Authors:  Daniel A Hashimoto; Ernest D Gomez; Enrico Danzer; Paula K Edelson; Jon B Morris; Noel N Williams; Kristoffel R Dumon
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Formal training in advanced surgical technologies enhances the surgical residency.

Authors:  Robert C G Martin; Farid J Kehdy; Jeff W Allen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Leigh G Seamon; Jeffrey M Fowler; Debra L Richardson; Matthew J Carlson; Sue Valmadre; Gary S Phillips; David E Cohn
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Making the transition from standard gynecologic laparoscopy to robotic laparoscopy.

Authors:  Jennifer L Ferguson; Todd M Beste; Keith H Nelson; James A Daucher
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  3 in total

1.  Implementing a robotics curriculum at an academic general surgery training program: our initial experience.

Authors:  Joshua S Winder; Ryan M Juza; Jennifer Sasaki; Ann M Rogers; Eric M Pauli; Randy S Haluck; Stephanie J Estes; Jerome R Lyn-Sue
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-03-19

Review 2.  The emerging role for robotics in cholecystectomy: the dawn of a new era?

Authors:  Jessica A Zaman; Tejender Paul Singh
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  RoCS: Robotic Curriculum for young Surgeons.

Authors:  Jessica Stockheim; Aristotelis Perrakis; Bernhard A Sabel; Robert Waschipky; Roland S Croner
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-07-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.