Literature DB >> 27637481

A comparison of the genotoxicity of benzo[a]pyrene in four cell lines with differing metabolic capacity.

Ume-Kulsoom Shah1, Anna L Seager1, Paul Fowler2, Shareen H Doak1, George E Johnson1, Sharon J Scott2, Andrew D Scott2, Gareth J S Jenkins3.   

Abstract

Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) is a known genotoxin and carcinogen, yet its genotoxic response at low level exposure has not been determined. This study was conducted to examine the interplay of dose and metabolic capacity on genotoxicity of B[a]P. Investigating and better understanding the biological significance of low level chemical exposures will help improve human health risk assessments. The genotoxic and mutagenic effects of B[a]P were investigated using human cell lines (AHH-1, MCL-5, TK6 and HepG2) with differential expression of the CYP450 enzymes CYP1A1, 1B1 and1A2 involved in B[a]P metabolism. MCL-5 and HepG2 cells showed detectable basal expression and activity of CYP1A1, 1B1 and 1A2 than AHH-1 which only show CYP1A1 basal expression and activity. TK6 cells showed negligible expression levels of all three CYP450 enzymes. In vitro micronucleus and HPRT assays were conducted to determine the effect of B[a]P on chromosome damage and point mutation induction. After 24h exposure, linear increases in micronucleus (MN) frequency were observed in all cell lines except TK6. After 4h exposure, only the metabolically competent cell lines MCL-5 and HepG2 showed MN induction (with a threshold concentration at 25.5μM from MCL-5 cells) indicating the importance of exposure time for genotoxicity. The HPRT assay also displayed linear increases in mutant frequency in MCL-5 cells, after 4h and 24h treatments. Mutation spectra analysis of MCL-5 and AHH-1 HPRT mutants revealed frequent B[a]P induced G to T transversion mutations (72% and 44% of induced mutations in MCL-5 and AHH-1 respectively). This study therefore demonstrates a key link between metabolic capability, B[a]P exposure time and genotoxicity.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose-response; Genotoxicity; HPRT assay; Metabolic activation; Micronucleus assay; Mutagenicity; Threshold

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27637481     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen        ISSN: 1383-5718            Impact factor:   3.189


  7 in total

1.  Effects of ambient PM2.5 and 9-nitroanthracene on DNA damage and repair, oxidative stress and metabolic enzymes in the lungs of rats.

Authors:  Ruijin Li; Lifang Zhao; Li Zhang; Minghui Chen; Jing Shi; Chuan Dong; Zongwei Cai
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  The expression of Phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes in human B-lymphoblastoid TK6 cells.

Authors:  Xilin Li; Yuxi Li; Kylie G Ning; Si Chen; Lei Guo; Jessica A Bonzo; Nan Mei
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health C Toxicol Carcinog       Date:  2022-03-11

3.  Development and Application of TK6-derived Cells Expressing Human Cytochrome P450s for Genotoxicity Testing.

Authors:  Xilin Li; Si Chen; Xiaoqing Guo; Qiangen Wu; Ji-Eun Seo; Lei Guo; Mugimane G Manjanatha; Tong Zhou; Kristine L Witt; Nan Mei
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Interacting partners of FEN1 and its role in the development of anticancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Chandrasekhar Kathera; Jing Zhang; Avilala Janardhan; Hongfang Sun; Wajid Ali; Xiaolong Zhou; Lingfeng He; Zhigang Guo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-18

5.  Comparative Analysis of Transcriptional Responses to Genotoxic and Non-Genotoxic Agents in the Blood Cell Model TK6 and the Liver Model HepaRG.

Authors:  Katrin Kreuzer; Heike Sprenger; Albert Braeuning
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Cell survival after DNA damage in the comet assay.

Authors:  Ezgi Eyluel Bankoglu; Carolin Schuele; Helga Stopper
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Multiple-endpoint in vitro carcinogenicity test in human cell line TK6 distinguishes carcinogens from non-carcinogens and highlights mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Katherine E Chapman; Eleanor C Wilde; Fiona M Chapman; Jatin R Verma; Ume-Kulsoom Shah; Leanne M Stannard; Anna L Seager; James A Tonkin; M Rowan Brown; Ann T Doherty; George E Johnson; Shareen H Doak; Gareth J S Jenkins
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 6.168

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.