Literature DB >> 27637358

Presurgical window of opportunity trial design as a platform for testing anticancer drugs: Pros, cons and a focus on breast cancer.

Marcello Maugeri-Saccà1, Maddalena Barba2, Patrizia Vici3, Laura Pizzuti3, Domenico Sergi3, Teresa Catenaro3, Luigi Di Lauro3, Marcella Mottolese4, Daniele Santini5, Michele Milella6, Ruggero De Maria7.   

Abstract

The high attrition rate is a major issue in anticancer drug development. Among the alternative trial designs, presurgical window of opportunity trials envision a short course treatment in the time window between diagnostic biopsy and surgery in a moderately-sized patient population. This approach allows testing therapeutics when pre- and post-treatment tumor tissues are available for comprehensive molecular analyses. The emerging evidence may help define the ability of a given agent to modulate its target(s) and help obtain a broader picture of the molecular changes operated by the treatment. The resulting gain may outweigh the potential harms for patients in the early disease setting. Window of opportunity trials have been extensively applied to breast cancer. Overall, a wider use of these trial designs might lead to the identification of potential responders, ineffective drugs or combinations, and ultimately contribute to enhance the efficiency of the clinical developmental process.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attrition rate; Breast cancer; Cancer therapeutics; Window of opportunity trials

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27637358     DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  5 in total

1.  State of the Science: Cancer Complementary and Alternative Medicine Therapeutics Research-NCI Strategic Workshop Highlights of Discussion Report.

Authors:  Dan Xi; Ting Bao; Qi Chen; Sushing Chen; Yung-Chi Cheng; Joseph Cullen; David A Frank; Jonathan W Friedberg; Ian Kronish; Jeffrey E Lee; Mark Levine; Pingping Li; Shao Li; Weidong Lu; Jun J Mao; Stephen O'Keefe; Larry Rubinstein; Manish A Shah; Leanna Standish; Channing J Paller; Edward Chu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2017-11-01

Review 2.  Metabolic features of cancer stem cells: the emerging role of lipid metabolism.

Authors:  Rita Mancini; Alessia Noto; Maria Elena Pisanu; Claudia De Vitis; Marcello Maugeri-Saccà; Gennaro Ciliberto
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Molecular and Clinical Activity of CDX-3379, an Anti-ErbB3 Monoclonal Antibody, in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Jonathan George; Seungwon Kim; Diego Alvarado; Veronique M Neumeister; Ahmed Chenna; Richard Gedrich; Thomas Hawthorne; Theresa LaVallee; Jennifer R Grandis; Julie E Bauman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  A Phase II Randomized Study of Neoadjuvant Letrozole Plus Alpelisib for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer (NEO-ORB).

Authors:  Ingrid A Mayer; Aleix Prat; Daniel Egle; Sibel Blau; J Alejandro Pérez Fidalgo; Michael Gnant; Peter A Fasching; Marco Colleoni; Antonio C Wolff; Eric P Winer; Christian F Singer; Sara Hurvitz; Laura García Estévez; Peter A van Dam; Sherko Kümmel; Christoph Mundhenke; Frankie Holmes; Naveen Babbar; Laure Charbonnier; Ivan Diaz-Padilla; Florian D Vogl; Dalila Sellami; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  A window-of-opportunity trial of the CXCR1/2 inhibitor reparixin in operable HER-2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Lori J Goldstein; Raymond P Perez; Denise Yardley; Linda K Han; James M Reuben; Hui Gao; Susan McCanna; Beth Butler; Pier Adelchi Ruffini; Yi Liu; Roberto R Rosato; Jenny C Chang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 6.466

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.