Literature DB >> 27636531

Application of an Adaptive Polynomial Chaos Expansion on Computationally Expensive Three-Dimensional Cardiovascular Models for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis.

Sjeng Quicken1, Wouter P Donders2, Emiel M J van Disseldorp3, Kujtim Gashi4, Barend M E Mees5, Frans N van de Vosse6, Richard G P Lopata7, Tammo Delhaas8, Wouter Huberts9.   

Abstract

When applying models to patient-specific situations, the impact of model input uncertainty on the model output uncertainty has to be assessed. Proper uncertainty quantification (UQ) and sensitivity analysis (SA) techniques are indispensable for this purpose. An efficient approach for UQ and SA is the generalized polynomial chaos expansion (gPCE) method, where model response is expanded into a finite series of polynomials that depend on the model input (i.e., a meta-model). However, because of the intrinsic high computational cost of three-dimensional (3D) cardiovascular models, performing the number of model evaluations required for the gPCE is often computationally prohibitively expensive. Recently, Blatman and Sudret (2010, "An Adaptive Algorithm to Build Up Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansions for Stochastic Finite Element Analysis," Probab. Eng. Mech., 25(2), pp. 183-197) introduced the adaptive sparse gPCE (agPCE) in the field of structural engineering. This approach reduces the computational cost with respect to the gPCE, by only including polynomials that significantly increase the meta-model's quality. In this study, we demonstrate the agPCE by applying it to a 3D abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) wall mechanics model and a 3D model of flow through an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). The agPCE method was indeed able to perform UQ and SA at a significantly lower computational cost than the gPCE, while still retaining accurate results. Cost reductions ranged between 70-80% and 50-90% for the AAA and AVF model, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27636531     DOI: 10.1115/1.4034709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  7 in total

1.  Geometric Uncertainty in Patient-Specific Cardiovascular Modeling with Convolutional Dropout Networks.

Authors:  Gabriel D Maher; Casey M Fleeter; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 6.588

2.  Surrogate models provide new insights on metrics based on blood flow for the assessment of left ventricular function.

Authors:  Dario Collia; Giulia Libero; Gianni Pedrizzetti; Valentina Ciriello
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of an arterial wall mechanics model for evaluation of vascular drug therapies.

Authors:  Maarten H G Heusinkveld; Sjeng Quicken; Robert J Holtackers; Wouter Huberts; Koen D Reesink; Tammo Delhaas; Bart Spronck
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2017-07-28

4.  Intima heterogeneity in stress assessment of atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Ali C Akyildiz; Lambert Speelman; Bas van Velzen; Raoul R F Stevens; Antonius F W van der Steen; Wouter Huberts; Frank J H Gijsen
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Combining statistical shape modeling, CFD, and meta-modeling to approximate the patient-specific pressure-drop across the aortic valve in real-time.

Authors:  M J M M Hoeijmakers; I Waechter-Stehle; J Weese; F N Van de Vosse
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-09-13       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  The impact of shape uncertainty on aortic-valve pressure-drop computations.

Authors:  M J M M Hoeijmakers; W Huberts; M C M Rutten; F N van de Vosse
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 2.648

7.  Uncertainty in model-based treatment decision support: Applied to aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Roel Meiburg; Wouter Huberts; Marcel C M Rutten; Frans N van de Vosse
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.747

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.