K Mergenthal 1 , C Güthlin 1 , M Beyer 1 , F M Gerlach 1 , A Siebenhofer 1,2 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In recent years, models for the delegation of GP tasks to non-physician medical staff have been tested, implemented in a general practice setting and, to some extent, funded by health insurance companies. AIM: How were changes in the spectrum of tasks performed by non-physician staff viewed and accepted by patients? METHODS: Between October 2014 and January 2015, a written survey was conducted among chronically ill patients (≥ 65 years of age) receiving health care from health care assistants (HCA) with or without the additional "health care assistant in the family practice", or VERAH qualification. Using a self-developed survey, based on a previous collection of data, patients were asked about various aspects of health care provided by HCAs. RESULTS: 77 practices participated and a total of 1 266 patients were surveyed. The patients said the HCAs had a role to play in many aspects of their health care. More than half the patients said HCAs could take responsibility for some of the home visits and contacts in the practice. Almost without exception, patients regarded the organisational, healthcare and other supporting services performed by the HCAs as very good. The results were more heterogeneous for specific consulting services. While consultations on vaccinations, preventive services, medical examinations and medication adherence were well accepted, this was much less often the case with advice on lifestyle. Many patients see HCAs as additional and competent persons they can trust, and could well imagine HCAs taking on responsibility for further delegable services. CONCLUSION: At least among GP-centered health care programme participants, many healthcare services delegated to HCAs were appreciated and accepted by patients. Home visits and case management, in the sense of structured individual health care for patients with special needs, are further services that may be well suited for delegation. This should be investigated in further studies (including qualitative studies). © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
BACKGROUND: In recent years, models for the delegation of GP tasks to non-physician medical staff have been tested, implemented in a general practice setting and, to some extent, funded by health insurance companies. AIM: How were changes in the spectrum of tasks performed by non-physician staff viewed and accepted by patients? METHODS: Between October 2014 and January 2015, a written survey was conducted among chronically ill patients (≥ 65 years of age) receiving health care from health care assistants (HCA) with or without the additional "health care assistant in the family practice", or VERAH qualification. Using a self-developed survey, based on a previous collection of data, patients were asked about various aspects of health care provided by HCAs. RESULTS: 77 practices participated and a total of 1 266 patients were surveyed. The patients said the HCAs had a role to play in many aspects of their health care. More than half the patients said HCAs could take responsibility for some of the home visits and contacts in the practice. Almost without exception, patients regarded the organisational, healthcare and other supporting services performed by the HCAs as very good. The results were more heterogeneous for specific consulting services. While consultations on vaccinations, preventive services, medical examinations and medication adherence were well accepted, this was much less often the case with advice on lifestyle. Many patients see HCAs as additional and competent persons they can trust, and could well imagine HCAs taking on responsibility for further delegable services. CONCLUSION: At least among GP-centered health care programme participants, many healthcare services delegated to HCAs were appreciated and accepted by patients. Home visits and case management, in the sense of structured individual health care for patients with special needs, are further services that may be well suited for delegation. This should be investigated in further studies (including qualitative studies). © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Entities: Chemical
Mesh： See more »
Year: 2016
PMID： 27636362 DOI： 10.1055/s-0042-110402
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gesundheitswesen ISSN： 0941-3790