Literature DB >> 27636212

Long-Term Effectiveness of Uterosacral Colpopexy and Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Cecile A Unger1, Matthew D Barber, Mark D Walters, Marie Fidela R Paraiso, Beri Ridgeway, J Eric Jelovsek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to estimate rates of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) 6 years after patients underwent transvaginal uterosacral colpopexy, or laparoscopic or robotic sacral colpopexy at a large tertiary care center. We hypothesized that recurrence rates would be higher than those previously reported.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of women who underwent uterosacral colpopexy, laparoscopic, and robotic sacral colpopexy for treatment of POP between 2006 and 2012. A composite outcome for recurrent POP was defined as subjective failure (vaginal bulge symptoms), objective failure (prolapse to or beyond the hymen), or any retreatment for POP (reoperation or use of a pessary). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated from each patient's date of follow-up, and parametric survival modeling was used to estimate recurrent POP over 6 years. Annual estimated recurrence rates by type of colpopexy are reported using the composite and individual definitions for recurrent POP.
RESULTS: One thousand three hundred eighty-one subjects met inclusion criteria: 983 (71.1 %) uterosacral, 256 (18.5%) laparoscopic, and 142 (11.2%) robotic colpopexies. Median (range) months to failure using composite recurrence were as follows: uterosacral, 17.1 (7.6-41); laparoscopic, 10.1 (4.7-25.1); robotic, 9.7 (1.6-17.2). By year 6 in the model, the estimated composite recurrence rates for the uterosacral colpopexy, robotic, and laparoscopic sacral colpopexy groups were 43%, 49%, and 57%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Estimated recurrence rates for uterosacral ligament colpopexy, laparoscopic, and robotic sacral colpopexy may be as high as 40% to 60% 6 years after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27636212     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  4 in total

1.  The underutilization of obliterative and constrictive surgery in the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Tony Bazi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Prolapse Repair Using Non-synthetic Material: What is the Current Standard?

Authors:  Ricardo Palmerola; Nirit Rosenblum
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Recurrent apical prolapse after high uterosacral ligament suspension - in a heterogenous cohort characterised by a high prevalence of previous pelvic operations.

Authors:  Katrine Dahl Pedersen; Marie Højriis Storkholm; Karl Møller Bek; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen; Susanne Greisen
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Analyzing the learning curve of vaginal pelvic reconstruction surgery with and without mesh by the cumulative summation test (CUSUM).

Authors:  Chin-Jui Wu; Kuan-Ju Huang; Wen-Chun Chang; Ying-Xuan Li; Lin-Hung Wei; Bor-Ching Sheu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.