Shannon M O'Connor1, Christopher R Beam2, Xiaochen Luo1, L Adelyn Cohen3, Jessica L VanHuysse1,4, Robert E Emery5, Eric Turkheimer5, Pamela K Keel6, S Alexandra Burt1, Michael Neale7, Steven Boker5, Kelly Klump1. 1. Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. 3. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, Texas. 4. Department of Behavioral Medicine, Genesys Regional Medical Center, Consortium for Advanced Psychology Training, Michigan State University Flint Area Medical Education, Michigan. 5. Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. 6. Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida. 7. Department of Psychiatry and Human Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Prior twin studies provide support for a single "common factor" that contributes genetic and environmental risk to a range of disordered eating symptoms. However, the common factor may be indexed less well by binge eating (BE) than other symptoms of eating disorders [i.e., body dissatisfaction (BD) and weight preoccupation (WP)]. We sought to explore the presence of a common factor and test whether loadings differed across three key symptoms (i.e., BE, BD, WP). METHOD: Disordered eating was assessed via self-report in 631 female twin pairs from the Michigan State University Twin Registry. RESULTS: We detected a common disordered eating factor that was influenced primarily by additive genetic and nonshared environmental influences. However, we observed different loadings on this common factor by symptom type, as factor loadings for BD and WP were stronger than that for BE. Moreover, the residual environmental and/or genetic variances (i.e., those that are independent of the common factor) were larger in BE than those of BD or WP. DISCUSSION: Although all three symptoms share a common set of genetic and environmental influences, risk for BE may involve additional genetic, biological, and environmental factors that are not shared with other symptoms of eating pathology.
OBJECTIVE: Prior twin studies provide support for a single "common factor" that contributes genetic and environmental risk to a range of disordered eating symptoms. However, the common factor may be indexed less well by binge eating (BE) than other symptoms of eating disorders [i.e., body dissatisfaction (BD) and weight preoccupation (WP)]. We sought to explore the presence of a common factor and test whether loadings differed across three key symptoms (i.e., BE, BD, WP). METHOD:Disordered eating was assessed via self-report in 631 female twin pairs from the Michigan State University Twin Registry. RESULTS: We detected a common disordered eating factor that was influenced primarily by additive genetic and nonshared environmental influences. However, we observed different loadings on this common factor by symptom type, as factor loadings for BD and WP were stronger than that for BE. Moreover, the residual environmental and/or genetic variances (i.e., those that are independent of the common factor) were larger in BE than those of BD or WP. DISCUSSION: Although all three symptoms share a common set of genetic and environmental influences, risk for BE may involve additional genetic, biological, and environmental factors that are not shared with other symptoms of eating pathology.
Authors: Kelly L Klump; Pamela K Keel; Sarah E Racine; S Alexandra Burt; Alexandra S Burt; Michael Neale; Cheryl L Sisk; Steven Boker; Jean Yueqin Hu Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2012-08-13
Authors: David Watson; Holly F Levin-Aspenson; Monika A Waszczuk; Christopher C Conway; Tim Dalgleish; Michael N Dretsch; Nicholas R Eaton; Miriam K Forbes; Kelsie T Forbush; Kelsey A Hobbs; Giorgia Michelini; Brady D Nelson; Martin Sellbom; Tim Slade; Susan C South; Matthew Sunderland; Irwin Waldman; Michael Witthöft; Aidan G C Wright; Roman Kotov; Robert F Krueger Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2022-02 Impact factor: 79.683
Authors: Monika A Waszczuk; Nicholas R Eaton; Robert F Krueger; Alexander J Shackman; Irwin D Waldman; David H Zald; Benjamin B Lahey; Christopher J Patrick; Christopher C Conway; Johan Ormel; Steven E Hyman; Eiko I Fried; Miriam K Forbes; Anna R Docherty; Robert R Althoff; Bo Bach; Michael Chmielewski; Colin G DeYoung; Kelsie T Forbush; Michael Hallquist; Christopher J Hopwood; Masha Y Ivanova; Katherine G Jonas; Robert D Latzman; Kristian E Markon; Stephanie N Mullins-Sweatt; Aaron L Pincus; Ulrich Reininghaus; Susan C South; Jennifer L Tackett; David Watson; Aidan G C Wright; Roman Kotov Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2019-12-05
Authors: Ji Hyun Baek; Kiwon Kim; Jin Pyo Hong; Maeng Je Cho; Maurizio Fava; David Mischoulon; Sung Man Chang; Ji Yeon Kim; Hana Cho; Hong Jin Jeon Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 3.240