| Literature DB >> 27635145 |
Shyam Patel1, Jennifer Andres2, Kamran Qureshi3.
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects roughly 170 million people worldwide. Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir (Sof/Led) is a new once daily direct acting antiviral combination pill that was approved in October 2014 for use in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection. Coadministration of Sof/Led is studied only with rosuvastatin which shows significantly increased level of drug and is associated with increased risk of myopathy, including rhabdomyolysis. There is no mention of such HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor interaction as a class, as pravastatin did not have any clinically significant interaction with Sof/Led. Other myotoxic drugs, including colchicine are not studied. We present a case of a serious drug interaction between Sof/Led and atorvastatin, in the background of CKD and colchicine use.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27635145 PMCID: PMC5011228 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3191089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Med
Pertinent laboratory results.
| Baseline | Admission | SVR12 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WBC (×1000/ | 5.3 | 2.2 | 3.6 |
| Hgb (gm/dL) | 11.5 | 10 | 11.2 |
| Plt (×1000/ | 140 | 58 | 142 |
| Tbili (mg/dL) | 0.4 | 1.6 | 0.5 |
| ALT (U/L) | 61 | 166 | 20 |
| AST (U/L) | 60 | 362 | 24 |
| Cr | 1.87 | 2.5 | 1.88 |
| GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 32 | 23 | 32 |
| UA | Large blood, | Negative blood | |
| CPK (U/L) | 7979 | 65 | |
| HCV RNA PCR (IU/mL) | 8517000 | Undetectable | Undetectable |
Figure 1Timeline of laboratory changes. Interrupted line denotes hospital admission day.
Naranjo probability scale. Total scores range from −4 to +13; the reaction is considered definite if the score is 9 or higher, probable if 5 to 8, possible if 1 to 4, and doubtful if 0 or less.
| Yes | No | Do not know | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Are there previous conclusive reports of this reaction? | +1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| |||
| Did the adverse event appear after the drug was given? | +2 | −1 | 0 |
|
| |||
| Did the adverse reaction improve when the drug was discontinued or a specific antagonist was given? | +1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| |||
| Did the adverse reaction reappear upon readministering the drug? | +2 | −2 | 0 |
|
| |||
| Were there other possible causes for the reaction? | −1 | +2 | 0 |
|
| |||
| Did the adverse reaction reappear upon administration of placebo? | −1 | +1 | 0 |
|
| |||
| Was the drug detected in the blood or were other fluids detected in toxic concentrations? | +1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| |||
| Was the reaction worsened upon increasing the dose? Or was the reaction lessened upon decreasing the dose? | +1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| |||
| Did the patient have a similar reaction to the drug or a related agent in the past? | +1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| |||
| Was the adverse event confirmed by any other objective evidence? | +1 | 0 | 0 |