BACKGROUND: Inducibility of ventricular tachycardia (VT) has limited ability to predict recurrent VT after catheter ablation (CA). We sought to correlate the signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) with the endocardial scar characteristics in patients with ischemic VTs. We suggest that successful CA can result in normalization of the SAECG. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty patients (42 male; aged 67±10 years, ejection fraction 34±12%) with ischemic VTs were prospectively enrolled. SAECG was performed before and after CA. Patients with at least 2 abnormal criteria (filtered QRS ≥114 ms; root mean square 40 <20 μV, and low-amplitude potentials 40 >38 ms) were defined as having positive SAECG. There was a linear correlation between endocardial scar area (<1.5 mV) and filtered QRS (r=0.414; P=0.003). CA resulted in normalization of the SAECG in 6 patients. In patients with filtered QRS ≤120 ms, 13 (40.6%) patients had normal SAECG after CA compared with 7 (21.9%) before ablation (P=0.034). Patients with normal or normalized SAECG after CA had better VT-free survival compared with those whose SAECG remained abnormal. Abnormal SAECG after CA was a predictor for VT recurrence: hazard ratio=3.64; P=0.039 for the overall population, and hazard ratio=5.80; P=0.022 for patients having QRS ≤120 ms. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant correlation between the surface SAECG and endocardial scar size in patients with ischemic VTs. A successful CA can result in normalization of SAECG that is associated with more favorable long-term outcomes. SAECG can be useful to assess the procedural success of VT ablation.
BACKGROUND: Inducibility of ventricular tachycardia (VT) has limited ability to predict recurrent VT after catheter ablation (CA). We sought to correlate the signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) with the endocardial scar characteristics in patients with ischemic VTs. We suggest that successful CA can result in normalization of the SAECG. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty patients (42 male; aged 67±10 years, ejection fraction 34±12%) with ischemic VTs were prospectively enrolled. SAECG was performed before and after CA. Patients with at least 2 abnormal criteria (filtered QRS ≥114 ms; root mean square 40 <20 μV, and low-amplitude potentials 40 >38 ms) were defined as having positive SAECG. There was a linear correlation between endocardial scar area (<1.5 mV) and filtered QRS (r=0.414; P=0.003). CA resulted in normalization of the SAECG in 6 patients. In patients with filtered QRS ≤120 ms, 13 (40.6%) patients had normal SAECG after CA compared with 7 (21.9%) before ablation (P=0.034). Patients with normal or normalized SAECG after CA had better VT-free survival compared with those whose SAECG remained abnormal. Abnormal SAECG after CA was a predictor for VT recurrence: hazard ratio=3.64; P=0.039 for the overall population, and hazard ratio=5.80; P=0.022 for patients having QRS ≤120 ms. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant correlation between the surface SAECG and endocardial scar size in patients with ischemic VTs. A successful CA can result in normalization of SAECG that is associated with more favorable long-term outcomes. SAECG can be useful to assess the procedural success of VT ablation.