| Literature DB >> 27634964 |
Matthew S Yorek1, Alexander Obrosov1, Bao Lu1, Craig Gerard1, Randy H Kardon1, Mark A Yorek1.
Abstract
Previously we demonstrated that a vasopeptidase inhibitor of angiotensin converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase (NEP), a protease that degrades vaso- and neuro-active peptides, improves neural function in diabetic rodent models. The purpose of this study was to determine whether inhibition or deletion of NEP provides protection from neuropathy caused by diabetes with an emphasis on morphology of corneal nerves as a primary endpoint. Diabetes, modeling type 2, was induced in C57Bl/6J and NEP deficient mice through a combination of a high fat diet and streptozotocin. To inhibit NEP activity, diabetic C57Bl/6J mice were treated with candoxatril using a prevention or intervention protocol. Twelve weeks after the induction of diabetes in C57Bl/6J mice, the existence of diabetic neuropathy was determined through multiple endpoints including decrease in corneal nerves in the epithelium and sub-epithelium layer. Treatment of diabetic C57Bl/6J mice with candoxatril improved diabetic peripheral neuropathy and protected corneal nerve morphology with the prevention protocol being more efficacious than intervention. Unlike C57Bl/6J, mice deficient in NEP were protected from the development of neuropathologic alterations and loss of corneal nerves upon induction of diabetes. These studies suggest that NEP contributes to the development of diabetic neuropathy and may be a treatable target. 2016 American Association of Neuropathologists, Inc. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.Entities:
Keywords: Candoxatril; Corneal nerves; Diabetes; Diabetic neuropathy; Neprilysin.; Neutral endopeptidase
Year: 2016 PMID: 27634964 PMCID: PMC7714044 DOI: 10.1093/jnen/nlw083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol ISSN: 0022-3069 Impact factor: 3.685
FIGURE 1Effect on glucose tolerance of high fat/streptozotocin (HF + STZ) induced-diabetes in C57Bl/6J mice with or without treatment of candoxatril (Intervention or Prevention) and NEP−/− mice. Data are presented as mean blood glucose levels in mg/dl ± SE. The area under the curve was significantly different for all diabetic mice vs their respective controls. The number of mice in each group was the same as shown in the Table.
Effects of Type 2 Diabetes in C57Bl/6J and Neutral Endopeptidase-Deficient Mice
| Determination | C57Bl/6J Control | C57Bl/6J Diabetic | C57Bl/6J Diabetic | C57Bl/6J Diabetic | NEP−/− Control | NEP−/− Diabetic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | + Candoxatril Intervention ( | + Candoxatril Prevention ( | ( | ( | |
| Start weight (g) | 25.6 ± 0.3 | 26.4 ± 0.4 | 26.0 ± 0.5 | 25.2 ± 0.4 | 26.6 ± 0.4 | 26.6 ± 0.5 |
| Final weight (g) | 33.0 ± 0.5 | 40.7 ± 2.0 | 42.9 ± 3.6 | 39.8 ± 3.6 | 28.7 ± 0.7 | 36.4 ± 2.0 |
| Blood glucose (mg/dl) | 186 ± 3 | 352 ± 26 | 345 ± 40 | 347 ± 32 | 235 ± 8 | 400 ± 28 |
| Motor nerve conduction velocity (m/s) | 42.4 ± 1.3 | 25.5 ± 1.2 | 37.8 ± 1.5 | 37.4 ± 1.2 | 38.2 ± 1.3 | 38.7 ± 1.7 |
| Sensory nerve conduction velocity (m/s) | 27.8 ± 0.7 | 22.6 ± 0.4 | 24.5 ± 0.4 | 25.1 ± 0.6 | 28.4 ± 0.6 | 29.1 ± 0.8 |
| Thermal nociception (s) | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 8.8 ± 0.1 | 6.3 ± 0.1 | 6.0 ± 0.1 | 4.5 ± 0.1 | 6.9 ± 0.2 |
| Intraepidermal nerve fiber density (profiles/mm) | 25.2 ± 0.5 | 15.6 ± 0.5 | 20.5 ± 0.5 | 22.2 ± 0.7 | 23.9 ± 0.8 | 22.5 ± 0.5 |
| Corneal Confocal Microscopy (mm/mm2) | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 3.6 ± 0.3 |
Data are presented as the mean ± SE.
ap < 0.05 compared with C57Bl/6J control.
bp < 0.05 compared with C57Bl/6J Diabetic.
cp < 0.05 compared with NEP Control.
dp < 0.05 compared with NEP Diabetic. Parentheses indicate the number of experimental animals. NEP, neutral endopeptidase.
FIGURE 2The region of the whorl of the sub-epithelial layer of the cornea was examined to determine the effect of high fat/streptozotocin (HF ± STZ)-induced diabetes in C57Bl/6J or NEP−/− mice on tubulin III and CGRP immunohistochemical staining. Immunohistochemical staining of the corneasin vitro was performed as described in “Materials and Methods” section. Representative images are shown for each condition. Imaging was obtained using a 40×/1.3 oil objective (scale bar = 50 µm). Data are presented as the mean ± SE of the surface area covered by nerve staining. Numbers of mice in each group were as shown in the Table. *p < 0.05 vs control; ***p < 0.001 vs control; ns, not significant.
FIGURE 3The sub-epithelial layers of whole mouse corneas were examined to determine the effect on tubulin III immunohistochemical staining of high fat/streptozotocin (HF + STZ)-induced diabetes in C57Bl/6J with or without treatment of candoxatril and in NEP−/− mice. Representative images are shown for each condition. Imaging was obtained using a 20×/0.8 objective (scale bar = 500 µm). Data are presented as mean ± SE of the surface area covered by nerve staining. Numbers of mice in each group were as shown in the Table. **p < 0.01 vs control; ****p < 0.0001 vs control; +p < 0.05 vs untreated diabetic. Diabetes does not impact the sizes of the corneas (Control and Diabetic, 8.53 ± 0.013 and 8.65 ± 0.12 × 106 µm2, respectively).
FIGURE 4The epithelial nerves in the region of the whorl of the cornea were examined to determine the effect on tubulin III immunohistochemical staining of high fat/streptozotocin (HF + STZ)-induced diabetes in C57Bl/6J with or without treatment of candoxatril and NEP−/− mice. Representative images are shown for each condition. Scale bar = 50 µm. Data are presented as the mean ± SE of the volume occupied by nerve staining. The numbers of mice in each group were as shown in the Table. ****p < 0.0001 vs control; +p < 0.05 vs untreated diabetic; +++p < 0.001 vs untreated diabetic.
FIGURE 5Cornea peripheral nerve bundles were examined to determine the effect on tubulin III and CGRP immunohistochemical staining of high fat/streptozotocin (HF + STZ)-induced diabetes in C57Bl/6J with or without treatment of candoxatril. Representative images are shown for each condition. Scale bar = 50 µm. Data are presented as the mean ± SE of the volume occupied by nerve staining. The numbers of mice in each group were as shown in the Table. **p < 0.01 vs control; +p < 0.05 vs untreated diabetic; ++p < 0.01 vs untreated diabetic.