Literature DB >> 27634954

Comparison of venous sinus manometry gradients obtained while awake and under general anesthesia before venous sinus stenting.

Kyle M Fargen1, Alejandro M Spiotta2, Madison Hyer3, Jonathan Lena2, Raymond D Turner2, Aquilla S Turk2, Imran Chaudry2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Venous sinus stenting is a popular treatment strategy for patients with high venous sinus pressure gradients across a site of outflow obstruction. Little is known about the effect of anesthesia on venous sinus pressure measurements.
OBJECTIVE: To compare venous manometry performed in patients under general anesthesia and while awake.
METHODS: A prospective database was accessed to retrospectively identify patients who had undergone venous sinus stenting. Pressure gradients were compared between those patients who underwent manometry while awake and before stenting under general anesthesia.
RESULTS: Thirty patients with both general anesthesia and awake pressure recordings were identified. Pressure measurements were highly variable but overall were higher under general anesthesia by an average of 5.8 mm Hg (1.7; p=0.002). A significant difference between awake and general anesthesia pressure measurements was detected in the sigmoid sinus (5.8 mm Hg (2.0); p=0.005) and the jugular vein (8.1 mm Hg (3.9); p=0.040). Only 11/30 (36.7%) pressure gradients remained within 5 mm Hg of the original awake gradient when repeated under general anesthesia; 9/30 (30%) patients had gradients that were at least 10 mm Hg different across procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Calculated pressure gradients were markedly affected by anesthesia. These findings suggest that candidacy for stenting should be determined with venous manometry while patients are awake owing to the unpredictable and highly variable effect of general anesthesia on pressure measurements and an apparent tendency to underestimate the degree of venous outflow obstruction. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood Pressure; Stenosis; Stent; Vein

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27634954     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  2 in total

1.  Venous sinus stenting as a treatment approach in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and encephaloceles.

Authors:  Gerald T Drocton; Alexander Copelan; Laura Eisenmenger; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; William P Dillon; Vinil N Shah; Karl Meisel; Matthew Amans
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Casper Versus Precise Stent for the Treatment of Patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  Nebiyat F Belachew; Severin Baschung; William Almiri; Ruben Encinas; Johannes Kaesmacher; Tomas Dobrocky; Christoph J Schankin; Mathias Abegg; Eike I Piechowiak; Andreas Raabe; Jan Gralla; Pasquale Mordasini
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.649

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.