INTRODUCTION/ BACKGROUND: Traditional imaging assessment criteria might not correlate well with clinical benefit from vascular endothelial growth factor pathway-directed therapy in metastatic renal cancer. Preclinical data suggest tumor growth is preceded by a rise in Ktrans level, a parameter derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that reflects vascular permeability. We thus hypothesized that Ktrans might be a predictive biomarker for pazopanib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic renal cancer were treated with pazopanib at 800 mg oral daily until disease progression. MRI of the abdomen and pelvis with a DCE-MRI sequence was obtained at baseline and every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Seventy-three DCE-MRI scans were completed and 66 were technically assessable. Of the 17 patients with at least 1 DCE-MRI scan after the baseline scan, 16 (94%) had a decline in Ktrans level. Changes in Ktrans compared with baseline after 1, 8, 16, and 24 weeks were -49%, -65%, -63%, and -53%, respectively (P = .0052, repeated measures analysis of variance). The median Ktrans nadir occurred at 8 weeks. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 32.1 weeks. PFS was longer in patients with higher baseline Ktrans values (P = .036, log rank). Baseline Ktrans did not reach significance in a Cox proportional hazard model including clinical prognostic index and previous treatments (P = .083). CONCLUSION: We show that Ktrans is a pharmacodynamic biomarker for pazopanib therapy in metastatic renal cancer. Because of the small sample size, the predictive capacity of Ktrans recovery could not be assessed, but baseline Ktrans correlated with PFS.
INTRODUCTION/ BACKGROUND: Traditional imaging assessment criteria might not correlate well with clinical benefit from vascular endothelial growth factor pathway-directed therapy in metastatic renal cancer. Preclinical data suggest tumor growth is preceded by a rise in Ktrans level, a parameter derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that reflects vascular permeability. We thus hypothesized that Ktrans might be a predictive biomarker for pazopanib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic renal cancer were treated with pazopanib at 800 mg oral daily until disease progression. MRI of the abdomen and pelvis with a DCE-MRI sequence was obtained at baseline and every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Seventy-three DCE-MRI scans were completed and 66 were technically assessable. Of the 17 patients with at least 1 DCE-MRI scan after the baseline scan, 16 (94%) had a decline in Ktrans level. Changes in Ktrans compared with baseline after 1, 8, 16, and 24 weeks were -49%, -65%, -63%, and -53%, respectively (P = .0052, repeated measures analysis of variance). The median Ktransnadir occurred at 8 weeks. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 32.1 weeks. PFS was longer in patients with higher baseline Ktrans values (P = .036, log rank). Baseline Ktrans did not reach significance in a Cox proportional hazard model including clinical prognostic index and previous treatments (P = .083). CONCLUSION: We show that Ktrans is a pharmacodynamic biomarker for pazopanib therapy in metastatic renal cancer. Because of the small sample size, the predictive capacity of Ktrans recovery could not be assessed, but baseline Ktrans correlated with PFS.
Authors: S Ammari; R Thiam; C A Cuenod; S Oudard; A Hernigou; C Grataloup; N Siauve; J Medioni; L S Fournier Journal: Diagn Interv Imaging Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 4.026
Authors: Tarek M Mekhail; Rony M Abou-Jawde; Gabriel Boumerhi; Sareena Malhi; Laura Wood; Paul Elson; Ronald Bukowski Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rupal S Bhatt; Xiaoen Wang; Liang Zhang; Michael P Collins; Sabina Signoretti; David C Alsop; S Nahum Goldberg; Michael B Atkins; James W Mier Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2010-08-10 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Xiaobing Fan; Milica Medved; Jonathan N River; Marta Zamora; Claire Corot; Philippe Robert; Philippe Bourrinet; Martin Lipton; Rita M Culp; Gregory S Karczmar Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Milica Medved; Greg Karczmar; Cheng Yang; James Dignam; Thomas F Gajewski; Hedy Kindler; Everett Vokes; Peter MacEneany; Myrosia T Mitchell; Walter M Stadler Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Remy B Verheijen; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens; Alwin D R Huitema; Neeltje Steeghs Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Pavitra Kannan; Warren W Kretzschmar; Helen Winter; Daniel Warren; Russell Bates; Philip D Allen; Nigar Syed; Benjamin Irving; Bartlomiej W Papiez; Jakob Kaeppler; Bosjtan Markelc; Paul Kinchesh; Stuart Gilchrist; Sean Smart; Julia A Schnabel; Tim Maughan; Adrian L Harris; Ruth J Muschel; Mike Partridge; Ricky A Sharma; Veerle Kersemans Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 12.531