Literature DB >> 27634384

Application of Item Response Theory to Modeling of Expanded Disability Status Scale in Multiple Sclerosis.

A M Novakovic1, E H J Krekels2,3, A Munafo4, S Ueckert2, M O Karlsson2.   

Abstract

In this study, we report the development of the first item response theory (IRT) model within a pharmacometrics framework to characterize the disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS), as measured by Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS). Data were collected quarterly from a 96-week phase III clinical study by a blinder rater, involving 104,206 item-level observations from 1319 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), treated with placebo or cladribine. Observed scores for each EDSS item were modeled describing the probability of a given score as a function of patients' (unobserved) disability using a logistic model. Longitudinal data from placebo arms were used to describe the disease progression over time, and the model was then extended to cladribine arms to characterize the drug effect. Sensitivity with respect to patient disability was calculated as Fisher information for each EDSS item, which were ranked according to the amount of information they contained. The IRT model was able to describe baseline and longitudinal EDSS data on item and total level. The final model suggested that cladribine treatment significantly slows disease-progression rate, with a 20% decrease in disease-progression rate compared to placebo, irrespective of exposure, and effects an additional exposure-dependent reduction in disability progression. Four out of eight items contained 80% of information for the given range of disabilities. This study has illustrated that IRT modeling is specifically suitable for accurate quantification of disease status and description and prediction of disease progression in phase 3 studies on RRMS, by integrating EDSS item-level data in a meaningful manner.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cladribine tablets; disease progression model; expanded disability status scale; item response theory; multiple sclerosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27634384     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-016-9977-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  22 in total

Review 1.  Item response theory and its applications to patient-reported outcomes measurement.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Chang; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Comparison of proportional and differential odds models for mixed-effects analysis of categorical data.

Authors:  Maria C Kjellsson; Per-Henrik Zingmark; E Niclas Jonsson; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 3.  Clinical scales for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  B Sharrack; R A Hughes
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.181

4.  The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. 2. Predictive value of the early clinical course.

Authors:  B G Weinshenker; B Bass; G P Rice; J Noseworthy; W Carriere; J Baskerville; G C Ebers
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets.

Authors:  Ben van Hout; M F Janssen; You-Shan Feng; Thomas Kohlmann; Jan Busschbach; Dominik Golicki; Andrew Lloyd; Luciana Scalone; Paul Kind; A Simon Pickard
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Gaining precision on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive: a comparison of item response theory-based scores and total scores.

Authors:  Steve Balsis; Alexis A Unger; Jared F Benge; Lisa Geraci; Rachelle S Doody
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 21.566

7.  Improving power to detect disease progression in multiple sclerosis through alternative analysis strategies.

Authors:  Brian Healy; Tanuja Chitnis; David Engler
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Improved utilization of ADAS-cog assessment data through item response theory based pharmacometric modeling.

Authors:  Sebastian Ueckert; Elodie L Plan; Kaori Ito; Mats O Karlsson; Brian Corrigan; Andrew C Hooker
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Assessment of definitions of sustained disease progression in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Brian C Healy; David Engler; Bonnie Glanz; Alexander Musallam; Tanuja Chitnis
Journal:  Mult Scler Int       Date:  2013-03-10
View more
  16 in total

1.  Modeling a Composite Score in Parkinson's Disease Using Item Response Theory.

Authors:  Gopichand Gottipati; Mats O Karlsson; Elodie L Plan
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Group cognitive rehabilitation to reduce the psychological impact of multiple sclerosis on quality of life: the CRAMMS RCT.

Authors:  Nadina B Lincoln; Lucy E Bradshaw; Cris S Constantinescu; Florence Day; Avril Er Drummond; Deborah Fitzsimmons; Shaun Harris; Alan A Montgomery; Roshan das Nair
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Application of longitudinal item response theory models to modeling Parkinson's disease progression.

Authors:  Haotian Zou; Varun Aggarwal; Glenn T Stebbins; Martijn L T M Müller; Jesse M Cedarbaum; Anne Pedata; Diane Stephenson; Tanya Simuni; Sheng Luo
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-09

4.  An item response theory based integrated model of headache, nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia in migraine patients.

Authors:  Dongwoo Chae; Kyungsoo Park
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Application of Item Response Theory to Model Disease Progression and Agomelatine Effect in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Marc Cerou; Sophie Peigné; Emmanuelle Comets; Marylore Chenel
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 6.  Role of Disease Progression Models in Drug Development.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Barrett; Tim Nicholas; Karim Azer; Brian W Corrigan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.580

7.  A Pharmacometric Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients Through Item Response Theory.

Authors:  Emilie Schindler; Lena E Friberg; Bertram L Lum; Bei Wang; Angelica Quartino; Chunze Li; Sandhya Girish; Jin Y Jin; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  A Longitudinal Item Response Theory Model to Characterize Cognition Over Time in Elderly Subjects.

Authors:  Marc Vandemeulebroecke; Björn Bornkamp; Tillmann Krahnke; Johanna Mielke; Andreas Monsch; Peter Quarg
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-29

Review 9.  The Clinical Pharmacology of Cladribine Tablets for the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Robert Hermann; Mats O Karlsson; Ana M Novakovic; Nadia Terranova; Markus Fluck; Alain Munafo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Item Response Theory Modeling of the International Prostate Symptom Score in Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Yassine Kamal Lyauk; Daniël M Jonker; Trine Meldgaard Lund; Andrew C Hooker; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.