| Literature DB >> 27633956 |
Jean-Charles Lebeau1, Sicong Liu1, Camilo Sáenz-Moncaleano1, Susana Sanduvete-Chaves2, Salvador Chacón-Moscoso2,3, Betsy Jane Becker1, Gershon Tenenbaum1.
Abstract
Research linking the "quiet eye" (QE) period to subsequent performance has not been systematically synthesized. In this paper we review the literature on the link between the two through nonintervention (Synthesis 1) and intervention (Synthesis 2) studies. In the first synthesis, 27 studies with 38 effect sizes resulted in a large mean effect (d = 1.04) reflecting differences between experts' and novices' QE periods, and a moderate effect size (d = 0.58) comparing QE periods for successful and unsuccessful performances within individuals. Studies reporting QE duration as a percentage of the total time revealed a larger mean effect size than studies reporting an absolute duration (in milliseconds). The second synthesis of 9 articles revealed very large effect sizes for both the quiet-eye period (d = 1.53) and performance (d = 0.84). QE also showed some ability to predict performance effects across studies.Keywords: attention; perceptual-cognitive skill; sport expertise; vision
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27633956 DOI: 10.1123/jsep.2015-0123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Sport Exerc Psychol ISSN: 0895-2779 Impact factor: 3.016