Literature DB >> 27633842

Hierarchical Layer Engineering Using Supramolecular Double-Comb Diblock Copolymers.

Anton H Hofman1, Mehedi Reza2, Janne Ruokolainen2, Gerrit Ten Brinke3, Katja Loos4.   

Abstract

The formation of unusual multilayered parallel lamellae-in-lamellae in symmetric supramolecular double-comb diblock copolymers is presented. While keeping the concentration of surfactant fixed, the number of internal layers was found to increase with molecular weight M up to 34 for the largest block copolymer. The number of internal structures n was established to scale as M0.67 and therefore enables easy design of such structures with great precision.
© 2016 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  block copolymers; morphology; supramolecular self-assembly

Year:  2016        PMID: 27633842      PMCID: PMC5113798          DOI: 10.1002/anie.201606890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl        ISSN: 1433-7851            Impact factor:   15.336


Whereas linear diblock copolymers are known to form only four different stable structures upon self‐assembly (namely spheres, cylinders, lamellae, and gyroids),1, 2, 3 careful design of the macromolecular architecture or including additional blocks can enrich the phase behavior significantly.4 For instance, binary AB multiblock copolymers5 and A(AB)3 miktoarm star polymers6 were recently demonstrated to give parallel lamellae‐in‐lamellae or extremely asymmetric lamellae. Incorporation of a third component in ABC triblock terpolymers gives rise to an even higher morphological complexity.7 However, preparation of more complex polymeric architectures does not automatically imply formation of more complex structures, since reduced mobility and confinement of the junction points can hamper proper phase separation. For real‐life technological applications, a synthetically less‐challenging approach is required. A supramolecular route8, 9, 10 enables researchers to produce comb‐shaped copolymers by simply combining regular linear block copolymers (BCPs) and small amphiphilic molecules, thereby avoiding such complex preparation methods.11, 12 Supramolecular complexes based on poly(4‐vinylpyridine) and 3‐pentadecylphenol (P4VP(3‐PDP), with x representing the number of 3‐PDP molecules per monomer) are among the most studied comb‐shaped systems. Since by now their phase behavior is very well understood13, 14 and materials are widely commercially available, several unique functional materials originating from such complexes have been reported. Examples include temperature‐responsive photonic crystals,15 CdSe/PbS nanoparticle assemblies,16 and highly ordered Au nanocomposites in thin films17, 18, 19 or solution.20 In polystyrene‐containing P4VP(3‐PDP)‐b‐PS comb–coil diblock copolymers, the supramolecular nature of the complex also provides an easy route for creating ordered porous structures by simple dissolution of 3‐PDP. Such templates have for instance been refilled with metal or carbon for the preparation of actuating materials21 or nanoporous cathodes,22 respectively. From a fundamental point of view these comb–coil systems are surprisingly interesting as well, as simultaneous self‐assembly of both the comb (3‐PDP/P4VP) and diblock (P4VP(3‐PDP)‐b‐PS) led to hierarchical structure formation.23 By changing the concentration of the alkylphenol or the composition of the parent PS‐b‐P4VP copolymer, self‐assembly gave access to multiple classical morphologies with an additional internal structure.24 Only highly sophisticated and synthetically challenging macromolecular architectures were previously found to give rise to such exceptional phase behavior. Double‐comb (or bottlebrush) diblock copolymers could be realized by introducing a second hydrogen‐bond‐accepting block.25 By using a single, symmetric P4VP‐b‐PAPI (P4PA) diblock copolymer, several unique morphologies were observed in [poly(4‐vinylpyridine)‐block‐poly(N‐acryloylpiperidine)](3‐nonadecylphenol) complexes as a function of the comb density x.26 Besides that, both the double parallel (x=0.5) and perpendicular alignment (x=1.0) of the internal layers with respect to the large lamellar BCP structure were in excellent agreement with our previous theoretical work.27 Interestingly though, the parallel morphology demonstrated multiple internal layers. Although not considered theoretically, to see whether this approach allows us to design materials with any number of internal layers, four additional lamella‐forming P4VP‐b‐PAPI BCPs were prepared and complexed to 3‐NDP (x=0.5; Scheme 1). Additional multiblock‐like structures28, 29 appeared upon self‐assembly using this simple and elegant route, with the number of internal layers increasing up to 34 per long period.
Scheme 1

Representation of a P4PA(3‐NDP)0.5 supramolecular double‐comb diblock copolymer.

Representation of a P4PA(3‐NDP)0.5 supramolecular double‐comb diblock copolymer. Symmetric (that is, f P4VP≈0.5) P4VP‐b‐PAPI diblock copolymers were synthesized via RAFT polymerization by starting from a P4VP macro chain transfer agent (Supporting Information, Tables S1, S2).30 The symmetric composition caused all P4PAyk‐z diblocks (y denotes the total molecular weight in kg mol−1, z the mass fraction P4VP in wt %) to self‐assemble into the expected lamellar structure, with its size increasing with molecular weight (Figures 1 a–e). Since perfect orientation of the lamellar nanostructure with respect to the viewer's eye can hardly ever be guaranteed, true domain spacings were obtained from SAXS.31, 32 Despite the weak scattering of these P4VP‐b‐PAPI diblocks owing to a low electron density contrast,30 the first order scattering maxima still allowed abstraction of their periodicity (Figure 1 f). Sizes ranged from 22.6 up to 146 nm (Supporting Information, Table S3).
Figure 1

a)–e) Bright‐field TEM images of iodine‐stained P4PA diblock copolymers. P4VP appears dark. P4PA31k‐47 (a), P4PA57k‐47 (b), P4PA109k‐48 (c), P4PA189k‐50 (d), and P4PA272k‐51 (e). f) Room‐temperature Lorentz‐corrected SAXS patterns of neat P4PA diblock copolymers.

a)–e) Bright‐field TEM images of iodine‐stained P4PA diblock copolymers. P4VP appears dark. P4PA31k‐47 (a), P4PA57k‐47 (b), P4PA109k‐48 (c), P4PA189k‐50 (d), and P4PA272k‐51 (e). f) Room‐temperature Lorentz‐corrected SAXS patterns of neat P4PA diblock copolymers. When mixed with 3‐NDP surfactants,33 TEM images of all five stained P4PA(3‐NDP)0.5 supramolecular complexes show parallel alignment of the small structure (Figures 2 a–e). Whereas the large length scale (BCP level) is indeed expected to increase with molecular weight, surprisingly though an increase of the number of small, internal layers was observed as well. For instance, only two dark P4VP lamellae can be observed in P4PA31k‐47, whereas P4PA272k‐51 displays an astonishing eight P4VP layers (Supporting Information, Table S4).
Figure 2

a)–e) Stained and f)–j) unstained TEM images of P4PA(3‐NDP)0.5 double‐comb diblock copolymers. P4VP appears dark in the stained images (iodine). P4PA31k‐47 (a, f), P4PA57k‐47 (b, g), P4PA109k‐48 (c, h), P4PA189k‐50 (d, i), and P4PA272k‐51 (e, j).

a)–e) Stained and f)–j) unstained TEM images of P4PA(3‐NDP)0.5 double‐comb diblock copolymers. P4VP appears dark in the stained images (iodine). P4PA31k‐47 (a, f), P4PA57k‐47 (b, g), P4PA109k‐48 (c, h), P4PA189k‐50 (d, i), and P4PA272k‐51 (e, j). According to room‐temperature SAXS patterns illustrated in Figure 3 a, regardless of the molecular weight, the small structure remains identical in all five complexes, that is, 4.4 to 4.5 nm (q≈1.4 nm−1). Multiple scattering events with integer‐valued ratios between the first‐ and higher‐order scattering maxima (q*, 2q*, 3q*,…, nq*) confirm the presence of large lamellae, starting at a spacing of 17.5 nm for P4PA31k‐47(3‐NDP)0.5 and going up to 77.0 nm for P4PA272k‐51(3‐NDP)0.5 (Supporting Information, Table S4 and Figure S1). Scherrer grain‐size analysis34 (Supporting Information, Table S5 and Figure S2) and TEM images recorded at a lower magnification (Supporting Information, Figure S3) support the high degree of ordering in all five complexes.
Figure 3

Room temperature SAXS intensity profiles of P4PA(3‐NDP)0.5 double‐combs (a). Temperature‐dependent SAXS profiles of P4PA109k‐48(3‐NDP)0.5 recorded at different stages of its self‐assembly (b).

Room temperature SAXS intensity profiles of P4PA(3‐NDP)0.5 double‐combs (a). Temperature‐dependent SAXS profiles of P4PA109k‐48(3‐NDP)0.5 recorded at different stages of its self‐assembly (b). A large lamellar morphology implies approximately equal distribution of 3‐NDP over both P4VP and PAPI. The diffraction patterns enable estimation of the number of layers inside the bright PAPI phase. Electron micrographs of unstained P4PA(3‐NDP)0.5 sections presented in Figures 2 f–j confirm the self‐assembly of 3‐NDP inside PAPI. For the low‐molecular‐weight complexes (P4PA31k‐47, P4PA57k‐47, and P4PA109k‐48), the predictions from SAXS are in excellent agreement with the local information provided by TEM, while the number of layers that can be observed in P4PA189k‐50 and P4PA272k‐51 fluctuate around these values (Supporting Information, Table S4). Although SAXS only provides average information, as a result of their higher molecular weights and broader distributions, local defects as can be seen in Figures 2 i and 2 j are expected to appear more often in larger BCP lamellae. Besides DSC (Supporting Information, Figure S4), thermal properties of all x=0.5 double‐combs were also investigated by temperature‐resolved SAXS. A heating scan of P4PA109k‐48(3‐NDP)0.5 is displayed in the Supporting Information, Figure S5, with the most important phase transitions being highlighted in Figure 3 b. As the large P4PA lamellar morphology (d L=36.8 nm) is a superposition of the parallel, internal small structure (d S=4.4 nm), this explains the enhanced peak intensity of the 8th‐order scattering maximum (d L≈8d S) at room temperature. Upon melting around 35 °C, the small structure indeed disappeared and only a large lamellar BCP structure continued to exist. At elevated temperatures the complex simply followed phase behavior as observed before in PS‐b‐P4VP(3‐PDP) coil–comb systems, with the alkylphenol only acting as plasticizer.35 Enhanced scattering and an increase of the long period were observed around 100 °C (d L=47.6 nm). Increased intensity of the second‐order peak suggests an asymmetric distribution of 3‐NDP over both P4VP and PAPI phases. Instead of the integer multiples of q* characteristic for lamellae, on further heating finally an additional peak appeared at q*, indicating the formation of a cylindrical structure due to migration of more 3‐NDP to the PAPI phase. Preference of 3‐NDP for the acrylamide block was observed before in P4PA57k‐47(3‐NDP)0.3.26 Similar phase behavior was observed in all other P4PA(3‐NDP)0.5 complexes (Supporting Information, Figure S6). A disordered melt was only found for the lowest‐molecular‐weight double‐comb P4PA31k‐47(3‐NDP)0.5 at higher temperatures (Supporting Information, Figure S6 a). Since the small structure disappears upon melting of the complex, the ability of the aliphatic tails of 3‐NDP to crystallize seems to play a very important role. Therefore, we are convinced that microphase separation of the side chains is only beneficial upon crystallization, similar to PAPI(3‐NDP)1.0 homopolymer complexes.26 In the melt (55 °C), just after disappearance of the small structure, the size of the large lamellae is reduced significantly compared to the neat P4PA diblock copolymers, up to 42 %. In this state, the 3‐NDP surfactants simply act as a nonselective solvent, giving rise to contraction of the polymer chains36 with the long period d L scaling as M 0⋅67 (Figure 4). Maybe fortuitously, this value equals the well‐known exponent characteristic for the strong segregation regime. Upon crystallization of the side chains, the backbone largely maintains its random‐walk nature, which was present for T>T m, only leading to a slight reduction of d L owing to increased density of the crystalline comb layers (Supporting Information, Table S5). Because the size of the small structure d S remains identical in all complexes (ca. 4.5 nm), d L just above the crystallization temperature determines the number of small structures n per long period. As a result, n is found to scale with the molecular weight in the same way, that is, n=d L/d S∝M 0⋅67. This relationship therefore allows preparation of multiblock‐like structures with any desired number of internal layers 2n.
Figure 4

Molecular weights of P4PA in P4PA(3‐NDP)0.5 double‐combs plotted against the large length scale d L at T≈60 °C (T>T m) and number of small repeating structures n (=d L/d S). Both parameters (d L and n) scale as M 0.67.

Molecular weights of P4PA in P4PA(3‐NDP)0.5 double‐combs plotted against the large length scale d L at T≈60 °C (T>T m) and number of small repeating structures n (=d L/d S). Both parameters (d L and n) scale as M 0.67. Although a multilayered structure requires the BCP to pass through several crystalline amphiphilic layers (Scheme 2), in comparison to a single layer morphology such an alignment is entropically highly favorable. Furthermore, observation of a 4.5 nm d S implies formation of comb layers containing two interdigitating amphiphiles pointing in opposite directions, similar to x=1.0 comb copolymers.37 We believe that the combination of these two factors is responsible for the self‐assembly into multilayered parallel lamellae‐in‐lamellae with a fixed small feature size.
Scheme 2

Representation of the 16‐layered (left) and 8‐layered structures (right) as characterized in P4PA109k‐48(3‐NDP)0.5 (n=d L/d S=8) and P4PA31k‐47(3‐NDP)0.5 (n=4) double‐comb diblock copolymers, respectively.

Representation of the 16‐layered (left) and 8‐layered structures (right) as characterized in P4PA109k‐48(3‐NDP)0.5 (n=d L/d S=8) and P4PA31k‐47(3‐NDP)0.5 (n=4) double‐comb diblock copolymers, respectively. In summary, rather complex double‐comb diblock copolymers were realized via a supramolecular approach, using relatively simple components. Multiblock‐like, multilayered morphologies appeared in all P4PA(3‐NDP)0.5 supramolecular complexes. The established scaling behavior of the number of layers with molecular weight provides direct control over the internal structure and thus enables straightforward design of parallel morphologies with any number of internal lamellae. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Supplementary Click here for additional data file.
  20 in total

1.  Nanophase-separated synchronizing structure with parallel double periodicity from an undecablock terpolymer.

Authors:  Jun Masuda; Atsushi Takano; Yutaka Nagata; Atsushi Noro; Yushu Matsushita
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Small-molecule-directed nanoparticle assembly towards stimuli-responsive nanocomposites.

Authors:  Yue Zhao; Kari Thorkelsson; Alexander J Mastroianni; Thomas Schilling; Joseph M Luther; Benjamin J Rancatore; Kazuyuki Matsunaga; Hiroshi Jinnai; Yue Wu; Daniel Poulsen; Jean M J Fréchet; A Paul Alivisatos; Ting Xu
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 43.841

3.  Self-assembled polymeric supramolecular frameworks.

Authors:  Nikolay Houbenov; Johannes S Haataja; Hermis Iatrou; Nikos Hadjichristidis; Janne Ruokolainen; Charl F J Faul; Olli Ikkala
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Supramolecular route to well-ordered metal nanofoams.

Authors:  Ivana Vukovic; Sergey Punzhin; Zorica Vukovic; Patrick Onck; Jeff Th M De Hosson; Gerrit ten Brinke; Katja Loos
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Self-assembly of (A-comb-C)-b-(B-comb-C) diblock copolymer-based comb copolymers.

Authors:  V Markov; A Subbotin; G ten Brinke
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2011-10-20

6.  Self-assembled polymeric solid films with temperature-induced large and reversible photonic-bandgap switching.

Authors:  Sami Valkama; Harri Kosonen; Janne Ruokolainen; Tomi Haatainen; Mika Torkkeli; Ritva Serimaa; Gerrit Ten Brinke; Olli Ikkala
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2004-11-28       Impact factor: 43.841

7.  Nanoporous Cathodes for High-Energy Li-S Batteries from Gyroid Block Copolymer Templates.

Authors:  Soumyadip Choudhury; Mukesh Agrawal; Petr Formanek; Dieter Jehnichen; Dieter Fischer; Beate Krause; Victoria Albrecht; Manfred Stamm; Leonid Ionov
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 15.881

8.  Creating Extremely Asymmetric Lamellar Structures via Fluctuation-Assisted Unbinding of Miktoarm Star Block Copolymer Alloys.

Authors:  Weichao Shi; Andrew L Hamilton; Kris T Delaney; Glenn H Fredrickson; Edward J Kramer; Christos Ntaras; Apostolos Avgeropoulos; Nathaniel A Lynd
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Polymer-polymer phase behavior.

Authors:  F S Bates
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Halogen-bonded mesogens direct polymer self-assemblies up to millimetre length scale.

Authors:  Nikolay Houbenov; Roberto Milani; Mikko Poutanen; Johannes Haataja; Valentina Dichiarante; Jani Sainio; Janne Ruokolainen; Giuseppe Resnati; Pierangelo Metrangolo; Olli Ikkala
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hierarchical Self-Assembly of Supramolecular Double-Comb Triblock Terpolymers.

Authors:  Anton H Hofman; Ivan Terzic; Marc C A Stuart; Gerrit Ten Brinke; Katja Loos
Journal:  ACS Macro Lett       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 6.903

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.