Literature DB >> 27633810

Does Arterial Flow Rate Affect the Assessment of Flow-Diverter Stent Performance?

H G Morales1, O Bonnefous2, A J Geers3,4, O Brina5, V M Pereira6, L Spelle7,8, J Moret7, I Larrabide9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Our aim was to assess the performance of flow-diverter stents. The pre- and end-of-treatment angiographies are commonly compared. However, the arterial flow rate may change between acquisitions; therefore, a better understanding of its influence on the local intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics before and after flow-diverter stent use is required.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five image-based aneurysm models extracted from 3D rotational angiograms were conditioned for computational fluid dynamics simulations. Pulsatile simulations were performed at different arterial flow rates, covering a wide possible range of physiologic flows among 1-5 mL/s. The effect of flow-diverter stents on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics was numerically simulated with a porous medium model. Spatiotemporal-averaged intra-aneurysmal flow velocity and flow rate were calculated for each case to quantify the hemodynamics after treatment. The short-term flow-diverter stent performance was characterized by the relative velocity reduction inside the aneurysm.
RESULTS: Spatiotemporal-averaged intra-aneurysmal flow velocity before and after flow-diverter stent use is linearly proportional to the mean arterial flow rate (minimum R2 > 0.983 of the linear regression models for untreated and stented models). Relative velocity reduction asymptotically decreases with increasing mean arterial flow rate. When the most probable range of arterial flow rate was considered (3-5 mL/s), instead of the wide possible flow range, the mean SD of relative velocity reduction was reduced from 3.6% to 0.48%.
CONCLUSIONS: Both intra-aneurysmal aneurysm velocity and flow-diverter stent performance depend on the arterial flow rate. The performance could be considered independent of the arterial flow rates within the most probable range of physiologic flows.
© 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27633810     DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  3 in total

1.  Entry remnants in flow-diverted aneurysms: Does branch geometry influence aneurysm closure?

Authors:  M Akli Zetchi; Adam A Dmytriw; Albert H Chiu; Brian J Drake; Niki V Alizadeh; Aditya Bharatha; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Thomas R Marotta
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  The effect of Dean, Reynolds and Womersley numbers on the flow in a spherical cavity on a curved round pipe. Part 2. The haemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents.

Authors:  Michael C Barbour; Fanette Chassagne; Venkat K Chivukula; Nathanael Machicoane; Louis J Kim; Michael R Levitt; Alberto Aliseda
Journal:  J Fluid Mech       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.627

3.  Implementation of computer simulation to assess flow diversion treatment outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mingzi Zhang; Simon Tupin; Hitomi Anzai; Yutaro Kohata; Masaaki Shojima; Kosuke Suzuki; Yoshihiro Okamoto; Katsuhiro Tanaka; Takanobu Yagi; Soichiro Fujimura; Makoto Ohta
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 5.836

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.