| Literature DB >> 27633790 |
Yunxia Zhao1,2,3, Ye Hou1,2,3, Fei Liu1,2,3, An Liu1,2,3, Lu Jing1,2,3, Changzhi Zhao1,2,3, Yu Luan1,2,3, Yuanxin Miao1,2,3, Shuhong Zhao1,2,3, Xinyun Li4,5,6.
Abstract
Feed efficiency (FE) is essential for pig production. In this study, 300 significantly differentially expressed (DE) transcripts, including 232 annotated genes, 28 cis-natural antisense transcripts (cis-NATs), and 40 long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), were identified between the liver of Yorkshire pigs with extremely high and low FE. Among these transcripts, 25 DE lncRNAs were significantly correlated with 125 DE annotated genes at a transcriptional level. These DE genes were enriched primarily in vitamin A (VA), fatty acid, and steroid hormone metabolism. VA metabolism is regulated by energy status, and active derivatives of VA metabolism can regulate fatty acid and steroid hormones metabolism. The key genes of VA metabolism (CYP1A1, ALDH1A2, and RDH16), fatty acid biosynthesis (FASN, SCD, CYP2J2, and ANKRD23), and steroid hormone metabolism (CYP1A1, HSD17B2, and UGT2B4) were significantly upregulated in the liver of high-FE pigs. Previous study with the same samples indicated that the mitochondrial function and energy expenditure were reduced in the muscle tissue of high-FE pigs. In conclusion, VA metabolism in liver tissues plays important roles in the regulation of FE in pigs by affecting energy metabolism, which may mediate fatty acid biosynthesis and steroid hormone metabolism. Furthermore, our results identified novel transcripts, such as cis-NATs and lncRNAs, which are also involved in the regulation of FE in pigs.Entities:
Keywords: Feed efficiency; liver; pig; vitamin A metabolism
Year: 2016 PMID: 27633790 PMCID: PMC5100860 DOI: 10.1534/g3.116.032839
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Summary of RNA-seq data from six liver samples
| Group | Sample | Input | Mapped | Uniquely mapped | Multiple mapped |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | L1 | 11,028,888 | 9,662,607 (87.61%) | 9,023,627 (93.39%) | 638,980 (6.61%) |
| L2 | 8,901,564 | 7,827,119 (87.93%) | 7,076,183 (90.41%) | 750,936 (9.59%) | |
| L3 | 8,551,718 | 7,670,784 (89.70%) | 7,038,474 (91.76%) | 632,310 (8.24%) | |
| Low | L4 | 7,148,669 | 6,283,279 (87.89%) | 5,677,878 (90.36%) | 605,401 (9.64%) |
| L5 | 8,324,699 | 7,348,705 (88.28%) | 6,797,361 (92.50%) | 551,344 (7.50%) | |
| L6 | 7,155,132 | 6,191,448 (86.53%) | 5,741,224 (92.73%) | 450,224 (7.27%) |
Figure 1Annotation of the uniquely mapped reads of RNA-seq in liver tissue of pigs. (A) Distribution of uniquely mapped reads in the pig genome. The percentages in this pie chart represent the mean of all six RNA-seq data. On average, over 50% uniquely mapped reads were located in the CDS region. The untranscriptional regions were defined as genome region of annotated genes but without coverage of annotated transcripts. (B) Reads distributed on the sense and antisense strands of annotated genes. Approximately 2% reads were mapped on antisense strands of annotated genes.
Figure 2Characteristics of cis-NATs, lncRNAs, and annotated genes expressed in collected liver tissues of six pigs. (A) Length distribution of identified cis-NATs. The most enriched length of cis-NATs was < 500 bp. (B) Length distribution of expressed lncRNAs. Almost 50% expressed lncRNAs were < 5 kb. (C) Length distribution of expressed annotated genes. (D) Statistical results of exon number for expressed cis-NATs (red), lncRNAs (blue), and annotated genes (green).
Figure 3DE transcripts between low- and high-FCR pigs. (A) Plot of the DE transcripts with FC ≥ 2.5 and FDR ≤ 0.05. Light blue, light green, and red dots represented the DE annotated genes, cis-NATs and lncRNAs, respectively. The x-axis and y-axis represent the logCPM and log2FC, respectively. (B) qPCR validation of DE transcripts in liver tissue of high-FCR (n = 10) and low-FCR (n = 10) pigs. The left plot is correlation analysis of RNA-seq and qPCR. For right bar plot, qPCR data were represented as mean ± SD; * P < 0.05.
DE transcripts between low- and high-FCR groups (top 10)
| Source | ID | Gene Name | Log2FC (Low/High) | FDR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annotated genes | NM_001167795.1 | 5.20 | 7.39E-31 | 4.98E-27 | |
| NM_001243319.1 | 4.18 | 1.40E-33 | 1.89E-29 | ||
| NM_213855.1 | 3.89 | 5.04E-14 | 8.48E-11 | ||
| XM_001924431.4 | 3.35 | 4.71E-15 | 9.05E-12 | ||
| XM_003126676.2 | 3.22 | 2.02E-11 | 1.43E-08 | ||
| XM_001924841.4 | −2.38 | 8.84E-14 | 1.32E-10 | ||
| XM_003359949.1 | −2.39 | 6.44E-09 | 2.22E-06 | ||
| XM_003359189.2 | −2.43 | 1.46E-06 | 2.46E-04 | ||
| XM_003133832.3 | −2.62 | 7.90E-13 | 7.59E-10 | ||
| XM_001929103.3 | −3.20 | 6.13E-13 | 6.87E-10 | ||
| XM_001925338.4-AS1.1 | 2.00 | 4.58E-07 | 8.98E-05 | ||
| XM_003127358.3-AS1.1 | 1.63 | 2.12E-03 | 4.75E-02 | ||
| XM_003126577.2-AS1.1 | 1.57 | 1.64E-03 | 4.03E-02 | ||
| XM_003359961.2-AS1.1 | 1.55 | 1.48E-04 | 8.60E-03 | ||
| NM_214056.1-AS3.1 | 1.45 | 2.65E-06 | 3.81E-04 | ||
| XM_003358629.1-AS2.3 | −2.34 | 2.27E-06 | 3.40E-04 | ||
| XM_001926397.3-AS7.1 | −2.49 | 1.40E-06 | 2.41E-04 | ||
| XM_003480614.1-AS1.1 | −2.50 | 2.51E-08 | 6.75E-06 | ||
| XM_003122843.3-AS1.1 | −2.74 | 1.54E-10 | 8.64E-08 | ||
| XM_003481282.1-AS1.1 | −3.11 | 3.34E-22 | 1.50E-18 | ||
| lncRNA | linc-ssct5500 | 4.05 | 1.75E-18 | 4.72E-15 | |
| linc-ssct3976 | 2.34 | 2.31E-07 | 5.02E-05 | ||
| linc-ssct3660 | 1.64 | 3.67E-05 | 3.12E-03 | ||
| linc-ssct5436 | 1.62 | 1.10E-03 | 3.18E-02 | ||
| linc-ssct5501 | 1.56 | 9.53E-04 | 2.99E-02 | ||
| linc-ssct6319 | −1.76 | 1.56E-06 | 2.54E-04 | ||
| linc-ssct6159 | −1.86 | 3.16E-07 | 6.54E-05 | ||
| linc-ssct1651 | −2.16 | 5.59E-06 | 6.97E-04 | ||
| linc-ssct6167 | −2.24 | 7.63E-06 | 8.91E-04 | ||
| linc-ssct3489 | −2.53 | 2.40E-08 | 6.67E-06 |
Figure 4Representation of correlation analysis. (A) Correlation analysis between cis-NATs and their sense genes. The red and green bar plots represent the positively and negatively correlated cis-NATs and sense genes pairs, respectively. (B) Heat map of correlation analysis between DE lncRNAs and annotated genes. The red and blue fill colors of the heat map cells represent the positive and negative correlations, respectively. The color bar is shown on the left.
Figure 5Significantly enriched GO terms for biological processes. (A) Significantly enriched biological process GO terms. The significant GO terms were determined by DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.7 (EASE Score < 0.1). Pink, orange, green, and purple colors represented the CYP1A1- or ALDH1A2-related, fatty acid metabolic process, immune-related, and other GO terms, respectively. (B) Distribution of DE genes in significantly enriched GO terms. Genes involved in at least two GO terms are listed. (C) Statistical analysis of the clustering results of GO terms. The most enriched category was the CYP1A1- or ALDH1A2-related GO terms (41%; left pie plot), which included five vitamin processes and four steroid-/hormone-related processes (right pie plot).
Figure 6Potential pathway of the annotated DE genes and lncRNAs in the liver tissues of high and low FCR pigs. Red and pink indicates upregulation in low FCR pigs (red, log2FC > 0.5; pink, 0 < log2FC ≤ 0.5); green and blue indicates downregulation in low FCR pigs (green, log2FC < −0.5; blue, −0.5 ≤ log2FC < 0).