Literature DB >> 27633238

Changes in glance behaviour when using a visual eco-driving system - A field study.

Christer Ahlstrom1, Katja Kircher2.   

Abstract

While in-vehicle eco-driving support systems have the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and save fuel, they may also distract drivers, especially if the system makes use of a visual interface. The objective of this study is to investigate the visual behaviour of drivers interacting with such a system, implemented on a five-inch screen mounted above the middle console. Ten drivers participated in a real-world, on-road driving study where they drove a route nine times (2 pre-baseline drives, 5 treatment drives, 2 post-baseline drives). The route was 96 km long and consisted of rural roads, urban roads and a dual-lane motorway. The results show that drivers look at the system for 5-8% of the time, depending on road type, with a glance duration of about 0.6 s, and with 0.05% long glances (>2s) per kilometre. These figures are comparable to what was found for glances to the speedometer in this study. Glance behaviour away from the windscreen is slightly increased in treatment as compared to pre- and post-baseline, mirror glances decreased in treatment and post-baseline compared to pre-baseline, and speedometer glances increased compared to pre-baseline. The eco-driving support system provided continuous information interspersed with additional advice pop-ups (announced by a beep) and feedback pop-ups (no auditory cue). About 20% of sound initiated advice pop-ups were disregarded, and the remaining cases were usually looked at within the first two seconds. About 40% of the feedback pop-ups were disregarded. The amount of glances to the system immediately before the onset of a pop-up was clearly higher for feedback than for advice. All in all, the eco-driving support system under investigation is not likely to have a strong negative impact on glance behaviour. However, there is room for improvements. We recommend that eco-driving information is integrated with the speedometer, that optional activation of sound alerts for intermittent information is made available, and that the pop-up duration should be extended to facilitate self-regulation of information intake.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Eco-driving; Glance behaviour; Spare capacity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27633238     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  3 in total

1.  Drivers' Visual Attention Characteristics under Different Cognitive Workloads: An On-Road Driving Behavior Study.

Authors:  Yanli Ma; Shouming Qi; Yaping Zhang; Guan Lian; Weixin Lu; Ching-Yao Chan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Eye tracking use in researching driver distraction: A scientometric and qualitative literature review approach.

Authors:  Tina Cvahte Ojstersek; Darja Topolsek
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 0.957

Review 3.  Effective and Acceptable Eco-Driving Guidance for Human-Driving Vehicles: A Review.

Authors:  Ran Tu; Junshi Xu; Tiezhu Li; Haibo Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.