Kapil Wattamwar1, Z Jason Qian2, Jenna Otter3, Matthew J Leskowitz4, Francesco F Caruana5, Barbara Siedlecki5, Jaclyn B Spitzer5, Anil K Lalwani5. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York2Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New York. 2. Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York4Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 3. Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York5Department of Emergency Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York6Boston Consulting Group, New York, New York. 5. Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Abstract
Importance: There is a critical disparity in knowledge regarding the rate and nature of hearing loss in the older old (80 years and older). Objective: To determine if the rate of age-related hearing loss is constant in the older old. Design, Setting, and Participants: We performed a retrospective review that began on August 1, 2014, with audiometric evaluations at an academic medical center of 647 patients aged between 80 and 106 years, of whom 141 had multiple audiograms. Main Outcomes and Measures: From a population perspective, the degree of hearing loss was compared across the following age brackets: 80 to 84 years, 85 to 89 years, 90 to 94 years, and 95 years and older. From an individual perspective, the rate of hearing decrease between 2 audiograms was compared with age. Results: Changes in hearing among age brackets were higher during the 10th decade of life than the 9th decade at all frequencies (5.4-11.9 dB hearing level [dB HL]) for the 647 patients (mean [SD] age, 90 [5.5] years). Correspondingly, the annual rate of low-frequency hearing loss was faster during the 10th decade by the 3.8 dB HL per year at 0.25 kHz, 3.8 dB HL per year at 0.5 kHz, and 3.2 dB HL per year at 1 kHz. Despite the universal presence of hearing loss in our sample, 382 patients (59%) used hearing aids. Conclusions and Relevance: There is a significant increase in the rate of hearing loss in patients during the 10th decade of life compared with the 9th decade that represents a fundamental change in the mechanistic process of presbycusis. Despite the potential benefit of hearing aids, they remain underused in the older old. Use may be improved by changing the method of hearing rehabilitation counseling from a patient-initiated model to a chronic disease example.
Importance: There is a critical disparity in knowledge regarding the rate and nature of hearing loss in the older old (80 years and older). Objective: To determine if the rate of age-related hearing loss is constant in the older old. Design, Setting, and Participants: We performed a retrospective review that began on August 1, 2014, with audiometric evaluations at an academic medical center of 647 patients aged between 80 and 106 years, of whom 141 had multiple audiograms. Main Outcomes and Measures: From a population perspective, the degree of hearing loss was compared across the following age brackets: 80 to 84 years, 85 to 89 years, 90 to 94 years, and 95 years and older. From an individual perspective, the rate of hearing decrease between 2 audiograms was compared with age. Results: Changes in hearing among age brackets were higher during the 10th decade of life than the 9th decade at all frequencies (5.4-11.9 dB hearing level [dB HL]) for the 647 patients (mean [SD] age, 90 [5.5] years). Correspondingly, the annual rate of low-frequency hearing loss was faster during the 10th decade by the 3.8 dB HL per year at 0.25 kHz, 3.8 dB HL per year at 0.5 kHz, and 3.2 dB HL per year at 1 kHz. Despite the universal presence of hearing loss in our sample, 382 patients (59%) used hearing aids. Conclusions and Relevance: There is a significant increase in the rate of hearing loss in patients during the 10th decade of life compared with the 9th decade that represents a fundamental change in the mechanistic process of presbycusis. Despite the potential benefit of hearing aids, they remain underused in the older old. Use may be improved by changing the method of hearing rehabilitation counseling from a patient-initiated model to a chronic disease example.
Authors: Stephanie C Rigters; Marc P van der Schroeff; Grigorios Papageorgiou; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; André Goedegebure Journal: Audiol Neurootol Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 1.854
Authors: Daniel T Gray; Lavanya Umapathy; Nicole M De La Peña; Sara N Burke; James R Engle; Theodore P Trouard; Carol A Barnes Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Daniel T Gray; Nicole M De La Peña; Lavanya Umapathy; Sara N Burke; James R Engle; Theodore P Trouard; Carol A Barnes Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Joaquin E Jimenez; Aida Nourbakhsh; Brett Colbert; Rahul Mittal; Denise Yan; Carlos L Green; Eric Nisenbaum; George Liu; Nicole Bencie; Jason Rudman; Susan H Blanton; Xue Zhong Liu Journal: Gene Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 3.688
Authors: Kapil Wattamwar; Z Jason Qian; Jenna Otter; Matthew J Leskowitz; Francesco F Caruana; Barbara Siedlecki; Jaclyn B Spitzer; Anil K Lalwani Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 6.223