Literature DB >> 27632273

The Influence of Crown-to-Implant Ratio on Short Implant Marginal Bone Loss.

Mariana Nunes, Ricardo Faria Almeida, Antonio Campos Felino, Paulo Malo, Miguel de Araújo Nobre.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a need for more studies evaluating the marginal bone loss (MBL) of rehabilitations in the posterior regions of extremely resorbed maxillae and mandibles supported by short-length dental implants with a high crown/implant ratio (C/I-R). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the C/I-R in implants on MBL considering dental implants with 4 mm of width and 7 mm of length.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 59 patients (mean age of 52.8 years) rehabilitated with at least one implant 4 mm in width and 7 mm in length, with an anodically oxidized surface and external connection on the premolar or molar positions, supporting a fixed prosthesis, and in function for a period of 36 months. Periapical radiographs at 36 months were used to calculate the C/I-R and MBL. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to test the correlation between C/I-R and MBL. The level of significance was set at 5%.
RESULTS: One hundred eighteen implants from 59 patients were evaluated. The mean ± SD MBL was 0.67 ± 0.63 mm. The C/I-R mean ± SD was 2.53 ± 0.79 mm. Thirty implants presented a C/I-R ≤ 2, while 88 implants had a C/I-R > 2. A weak nonsignificant inverse correlation (r = -0.081; P = .383, Spearman) was registered between C/I-R and MBL.
CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, it is possible to conclude that implant-supported fixed prostheses with C/I-R > 2 do not correlate positively with MBL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27632273     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.4336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  7 in total

1.  Clinical Performance of Short Expandable Dental Implants for Oral Rehabilitation in Highly Atrophic Alveolar Bone: 3-year Results of a Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study.

Authors:  Waldemar Reich; Ramona Schweyen; Jeremias Hey; Sven Otto; Alexander Walter Eckert
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 2.430

2.  A Minimally Invasive Technique for Short Spiral Implant Insertion with Contextual Crestal Sinus Lifting in the Atrophic Maxilla: A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  Massimo Corsalini; Silvia D'Agostino; Gianfranco Favia; Marco Dolci; Angela Tempesta; Daniela Di Venere; Luisa Limongelli; Saverio Capodiferro
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-24

3.  Survival rates of ultra-short (<6 mm) compared with short locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior areas: A 5-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Giorgio Lombardo; Annarita Signoriello; Mauro Marincola; Pietro Liboni; Estevam A Bonfante; Pier F Nocini
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.259

4.  Short Dental Implants (≤8.5 mm) versus Standard Dental Implants (≥10 mm): A One-Year Post-Loading Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Guillermo Pardo-Zamora; Antonio José Ortiz-Ruíz; Fabio Camacho-Alonso; José Francisco Martínez-Marco; Juan Manuel Molina-González; Núria Piqué-Clusella; Ascensión Vicente-Hernández
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The Influence of the Crown-Implant Ratio on the Crestal Bone Level and Implant Secondary Stability: 36-Month Clinical Study.

Authors:  Jakub Hadzik; Maciej Krawiec; Konstanty Sławecki; Christiane Kunert-Keil; Marzena Dominiak; Tomasz Gedrange
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  CT-based dentulous mandibular alveolar ridge measurements as predictors of crown-to-implant ratio for short and extra short dental implants.

Authors:  Francesco Cavallin; Stefano Sivolella; Silvia Meggiorin; Nadia Ferrarese; Amalia Lupi; Antonino Fiorino; Chiara Giraudo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Clinical Comparation of Extra-Short (4 mm) and Long (>8 mm) Dental Implants Placed in Mandibular Bone: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis.

Authors:  Vittorio Moraschini; Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Mourão; Pietro Montemezzi; Ingrid Chaves Cavalcante Kischinhevsky; Daniel Costa Ferreira de Almeida; Kayvon Javid; Jamil Awad Shibli; José Mauro Granjeiro; Monica Diuana Calasans-Maia
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.