PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of implant coronal wall thickness on load-bearing capacity and screw joint stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental implants were customized after investigation of the thinnest coronal wall thickness of commercially available implant systems with a regular platform diameter. Implants with four coronal wall thicknesses (0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 mm) were fabricated. Three sets of tests were performed. The first set was a failure test to evaluate load-bearing capacity and elastic limit. The second and third sets were cyclic and static loading tests. After abutment screw tightening of each implant, vertical cyclic loading of 250 N or static loading from 250 to 800 N was applied. Coronal diameter expansion, axial displacement, and removal torque values of the implants were compared. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis (α = .05). RESULTS: Implants with 0.2-mm coronal wall thickness demonstrated significantly low load-bearing capacity and elastic limit (both P < .05). These implants also showed significantly large coronal diameter expansion and axial displacement after screw tightening (both P < .05). Greater vertical load and thinner coronal wall thickness significantly increased coronal diameter expansion of the implant, axial displacement of the abutment, and removal torque loss of the abutment screw (all P < .05). CONCLUSION: Implant coronal wall thickness of 0.2 mm produces significantly inferior load-bearing capacity and screw joint stability.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of implant coronal wall thickness on load-bearing capacity and screw joint stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental implants were customized after investigation of the thinnest coronal wall thickness of commercially available implant systems with a regular platform diameter. Implants with four coronal wall thicknesses (0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 mm) were fabricated. Three sets of tests were performed. The first set was a failure test to evaluate load-bearing capacity and elastic limit. The second and third sets were cyclic and static loading tests. After abutment screw tightening of each implant, vertical cyclic loading of 250 N or static loading from 250 to 800 N was applied. Coronal diameter expansion, axial displacement, and removal torque values of the implants were compared. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis (α = .05). RESULTS: Implants with 0.2-mm coronal wall thickness demonstrated significantly low load-bearing capacity and elastic limit (both P < .05). These implants also showed significantly large coronal diameter expansion and axial displacement after screw tightening (both P < .05). Greater vertical load and thinner coronal wall thickness significantly increased coronal diameter expansion of the implant, axial displacement of the abutment, and removal torque loss of the abutment screw (all P < .05). CONCLUSION: Implant coronal wall thickness of 0.2 mm produces significantly inferior load-bearing capacity and screw joint stability.
Authors: Ana I Nicolas-Silvente; Eugenio Velasco-Ortega; Ivan Ortiz-Garcia; Alvaro Jimenez-Guerra; Loreto Monsalve-Guil; Raul Ayuso-Montero; Javier Gil; Jose Lopez-Lopez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Maria Beatriz Bello Taborda; Gabriela Sumie Yaguinuma Gonçalves; Cecília Alves de Sousa; Wirley Gonçalves Assunção Journal: Int J Dent Date: 2021-11-18