Literature DB >> 27631646

Lateral osteophytes do not represent a contraindication to medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up.

Thomas W Hamilton1, Rajan Choudhary2, Cathy Jenkins3, Stephen J Mellon2, Christopher A F Dodd3, David W Murray2,3, Hemant G Pandit2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Lateral osteophytes have been reported to be associated with lateral compartment disease and as such it is unclear whether medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty should be performed if these are present.
METHODS: Using the OARSI classification system, 0 (no osteophyte) to 3 (large osteophyte), radiographs from a series of cemented meniscal-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty implanted in the setting of full-thickness lateral cartilage where lateral osteophytes were not considered a contraindication were identified and factors associated with the presence and size of lateral osteophytes, and their impact on clinical outcomes and implant survival were assessed.
RESULTS: Pre-operative radiographs from 458 knees (392 patients), independently followed up for a mean 10.5 years (range 5.3-16.6), were assessed. Lateral osteophytes were present in 62 % of knees with 18 % scored as Grade 3. Inter-observer reliability was good (kappa = 0.70). The presence and size of lateral osteophytes was associated with younger age at joint replacement (p = 0.01) and increasing BMI (p = 0.01). No association was seen with gender, pre-operative status, assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), American Knee Society (AKSS) Objective or Functional Score, Tegner activity score, or size of medial tibial lesion. Subgroup analysis of Grade 3 Osteophytes revealed that these were associated with a greater degree of macroscopic ACL damage. At 10 years there was no difference in function (n.s.), and at 15 years no difference in implant survival or mechanism of failure between groups (n.s.). Subgroup analysis of Grade 3 osteophytes found no significant difference in functional outcome at 10 years or implant survival at 15 years.
CONCLUSION: The presence of lateral osteophytes is not a contraindication to medial meniscal-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The clinical relevance of this study is that it highlights the importance of an appropriate pre-operative assessment of the lateral compartment as in the setting of full-thickness cartilage at operation lateral osteophytes do not compromise long-term functional outcome or implant survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional outcome; Implant survival; Meniscal-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Osteophytes; Patient selection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27631646     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4313-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  26 in total

1.  The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores.

Authors:  D W Murray; R Fitzpatrick; K Rogers; H Pandit; D J Beard; A J Carr; J Dawson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-08

2.  Age and sex incidence of osteophytes in the knee joint.

Authors:  J Hernborg; B E Nilsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1973

3.  The relation between cartilage damage and osteophyte size in a murine model for osteoarthritis in the knee.

Authors:  G J van Osch; P M van der Kraan; A A van Valburg; W B van den Berg
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Intra-operative findings in varus osteoarthritis of the knee. An analysis of pre-operative alignment in potential candidates for unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  M A Ritter; P M Faris; A E Thong; K E Davis; J B Meding; M E Berend
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-01

6.  Osteophyte formation after ACL rupture in mice is associated with joint restabilization and loss of range of motion.

Authors:  Allison W Hsia; Matthew J Anderson; Mollie A Heffner; Earl P Lagmay; Regina Zavodovskaya; Blaine A Christiansen
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha in synovial fluid are associated with progression of radiographic knee osteoarthritis in subjects with previous meniscectomy.

Authors:  S Larsson; M Englund; A Struglics; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  The clinical outcome of minimally invasive Phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up of 1000 UKAs.

Authors:  H Pandit; T W Hamilton; C Jenkins; S J Mellon; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Radiological Decision Aid to determine suitability for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: development and preliminary validation.

Authors:  T W Hamilton; H G Pandit; A V Lombardi; J B Adams; C R Oosthuizen; A Clavé; C A F Dodd; K R Berend; D W Murray
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.082

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  [Focal femoral resurfacing and unicompartmental knee replacement : Between osteotomy and total knee replacement].

Authors:  Philipp Henle; Matthias J Feucht; Christian Stärke
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Unicompartmental knee replacement - Current perspectives.

Authors:  Stefano Campi; Saket Tibrewal; Rory Cuthbert; Sheo B Tibrewal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-11-28

Review 3.  Long-term outcomes of over 8,000 medial Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knees-a systematic review.

Authors:  Hasan R Mohammad; Louise Strickland; Thomas W Hamilton; David W Murray
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Limb position influences component orientation in Oxford mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an experimental cadaveric study.

Authors:  Sachin Tapasvi; Anshu Shekhar; Shantanu Patil; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Are There Harmful Effects of Preoperative Mild Lateral or Patellofemoral Degeneration on the Outcomes of Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Compartmental Osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Dong Hyun Kim; Seong Chan Kim; Ji Soo Yoon; Yong Seuk Lee
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-06-23

Review 6.  Evidence-based surgical technique for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tae Kyun Kim; Anurag Mittal; Prashant Meshram; Woo Hyun Kim; Sang Min Choi
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-07

7.  Agreement and accuracy of radiographic assessment using a decision aid for medial Oxford partial knee replacement: multicentre study.

Authors:  Takafumi Hiranaka; Ryosuke Furuhashi; Kenichiro Takashiba; Takao Kodama; Kazuhiko Michishita; Hiroshi Inui; Eita Togashi
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-14

8.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current indications, technical issues and results.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán; Primitivo Gómez-Cardero
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-06-06

Review 9.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, an enigma, and the ten enigmas of medial UKA.

Authors:  Anurag Mittal; Prashant Meshram; Woo Hyun Kim; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2020-09-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.