Literature DB >> 27631585

Benchmark of GW Approaches for the GW100 Test Set.

Fabio Caruso1, Matthias Dauth2, Michiel J van Setten3, Patrick Rinke4.   

Abstract

For the recent GW100 test set of molecular ionization energies, we present a comprehensive assessment of different GW methodologies: fully self-consistent GW (scGW), quasiparticle self-consistent GW (qsGW), partially self-consistent GW0 (scGW0), perturbative GW (G0W0), and optimized G0W0 based on the minimization of the deviation from the straight-line error (DSLE-min GW). We compare our GW calculations to coupled-cluster singles, doubles, and perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] reference data for GW100. We find scGW and qsGW ionization energies in excellent agreement with CCSD(T), with discrepancies typically smaller than 0.3 eV (scGW) and 0.2 eV (qsGW), respectively. For scGW0 and G0W0 the deviation from CCSD(T) is strongly dependent on the starting point. We further relate the discrepancy between the GW ionization energies and CCSD(T) to the deviation from straight line error (DSLE). In DSLE-minimized GW calculations, the DSLE is significantly reduced, yielding a systematic improvement in the description of the ionization energies.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27631585     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  4 in total

1.  Full-frequency GW without frequency.

Authors:  Sylvia J Bintrim; Timothy C Berkelbach
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Renormalized Singles Green's Function in the T-Matrix Approximation for Accurate Quasiparticle Energy Calculation.

Authors:  Jiachen Li; Zehua Chen; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.888

3.  The GW Miracle in Many-Body Perturbation Theory for the Ionization Potential of Molecules.

Authors:  Fabien Bruneval; Nike Dattani; Michiel J van Setten
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.221

4.  Assessment of the Second-Order Statically Screened Exchange Correction to the Random Phase Approximation for Correlation Energies.

Authors:  Arno Förster
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.578

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.