Samara Perez1, Gilla K Shapiro, Ovidiu Tatar, Keven Joyal-Desmarais, Zeev Rosberger. 1. From the *Department of Psychology, McGill University; †Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec; ‡Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; §Louise Granofsky-Psychosocial Oncology Program, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital; and ¶Departments of Oncology and Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Parents' human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination decision-making is strongly influenced by their attitudes and beliefs toward vaccination. To date, psychometrically evaluated HPV vaccination attitudes scales have been narrow in their range of measured beliefs and often limited to attitudes surrounding female HPV vaccination. The study aimed to develop a comprehensive, validated and reliable HPV vaccination attitudes and beliefs scale among parents of boys. METHODS: Data were collected from Canadian parents of 9- to 16-year-old boys using an online questionnaire completed in 2 waves with a 7-month interval. Based on existing vaccination attitudes scales, a set of 61 attitude and belief items were developed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. Internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach's α and stability over time with intraclass correlations. RESULTS: The HPV Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (HABS) was informed by 3117 responses at time 1 and 1427 at time 2. The HABS contains 46 items organized in 9 factors: Benefits (10 items), Threat (3 items), Influence (8 items), Harms (6 items), Risk (3 items), Affordability (3 items), Communication (5 items), Accessibility (4 items), and General Vaccination Attitudes (4 items). Model fit at time 2 were: χ/df = 3.13, standardized root mean square residual = 0.056, root mean square error approximation (confidence interval) = 0.039 (0.037-0.04), comparative fit index = 0.962 and Tucker-Lewis index = 0.957. Cronbach's αs were greater than 0.8 and intraclass correlations of factors were greater than 0.6. CONCLUSIONS: The HABS is the first psychometrically-tested scale of HPV attitude and beliefs among parents of boys available for use in English and French. Further testing among parents of girls and young adults and assessing predictive validity are warranted.
BACKGROUND: Parents' human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination decision-making is strongly influenced by their attitudes and beliefs toward vaccination. To date, psychometrically evaluated HPV vaccination attitudes scales have been narrow in their range of measured beliefs and often limited to attitudes surrounding female HPV vaccination. The study aimed to develop a comprehensive, validated and reliable HPV vaccination attitudes and beliefs scale among parents of boys. METHODS: Data were collected from Canadian parents of 9- to 16-year-old boys using an online questionnaire completed in 2 waves with a 7-month interval. Based on existing vaccination attitudes scales, a set of 61 attitude and belief items were developed. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. Internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach's α and stability over time with intraclass correlations. RESULTS: The HPV Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (HABS) was informed by 3117 responses at time 1 and 1427 at time 2. The HABS contains 46 items organized in 9 factors: Benefits (10 items), Threat (3 items), Influence (8 items), Harms (6 items), Risk (3 items), Affordability (3 items), Communication (5 items), Accessibility (4 items), and General Vaccination Attitudes (4 items). Model fit at time 2 were: χ/df = 3.13, standardized root mean square residual = 0.056, root mean square error approximation (confidence interval) = 0.039 (0.037-0.04), comparative fit index = 0.962 and Tucker-Lewis index = 0.957. Cronbach's αs were greater than 0.8 and intraclass correlations of factors were greater than 0.6. CONCLUSIONS: The HABS is the first psychometrically-tested scale of HPV attitude and beliefs among parents of boys available for use in English and French. Further testing among parents of girls and young adults and assessing predictive validity are warranted.
Authors: Lavanya Vasudevan; Jan Ostermann; Yunfei Wang; Sayward E Harrison; Valerie Yelverton; Laura J Fish; Charnetta Williams; Emmanuel B Walter Journal: Vaccine X Date: 2022-06-15
Authors: Aaron S Wallace; Kathleen Wannemuehler; George Bonsu; Melissa Wardle; Mawuli Nyaku; Kwame Amponsah-Achiano; John F Dadzie; Frederick O Sarpong; Walter A Orenstein; Eli S Rosenberg; Saad B Omer Journal: Vaccine Date: 2019-01-11 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Joanna May Kesten; Carrie Flannagan; Eimear Ruane-McAteer; Samuel William David Merriel; Tom Nadarzynski; Gilla Shapiro; Zeev Rosberger; Gillian Prue Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 2.692